Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • Curt Doolittle shared a photo.

    (FB 1543420382 Timestamp) THREE CLASSES OF COERCION (regular repost)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543418196 Timestamp) THE UNIQUENESS OF THE GRAMMARS by Bill Joslin (new, important idea) The development of various grammars of disambiguation defines the uniqueness of the west. A culture of martial raiders requires explicit technologies for maintain peaceful coexistence among dangerous people, as well as requires truthful reporting of battle situations for raiding to be successful. This leads to social value on truth – truthful reporting (reliability) and honest interactions to prevent in-group conflict (honesty). The result being the innovation of OATH (proto-contract) and competency (meritocracy). This I see as the initial step (or early) step toward disambiguation. Disambiguation of reporting on intention and ability. Incremental stages of growth for European peoples can be seen as the progress of disambiguation. Common law : Disambiguation of accountability and disambiguation of reciprocal consequences (punishment fit the crime) Contract: Disambiguation of terms of agreement and limits to commitment (Trade) Institutionalization of Law : Disambiguation of the application of power over a polis i.e. rule (isolation of discretionary rule) Science: disambiguation of external causal relations (Propertarianism – disambiguation of human action and human conflict) Disambiguation provides a commensurable measure in evaluating “western identity” for what belongs or doesn’t belong, or what needs to be corrected and how. So when Abrahamists conflate religion and western civilization (christianity, Jewish contribution, secular islam), or Aesthetics (spiritualists) propose that aesthetics undergirds civilization, or linguists propose language as the means to calculate power and distribution (GA) etc… all while stating they are “for the west”, I get confused and a bit uppity. Introduction of ambiguity is not what we do – its what we’ve been taught by those who’d see us gone or enslaved.

  • (FB 1543416435 Timestamp) UNDERSTANDING SCIENTIFIC PRAXEOLOGY: ECONOMIC INTUITIO

    (FB 1543416435 Timestamp) UNDERSTANDING SCIENTIFIC PRAXEOLOGY: ECONOMIC INTUITIONISM

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543416288 Timestamp) THE NEXT SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION (worth repeating) This persistent ‘error’ in the soft (projected) ‘sciences’, is, as far as my work goes, the central problem of thought in the 21st century. We are still trying to overcome the monopoly authoritarianism of Boas, Marx, Feud, Adorno et all, Derrida et al, and the feminists et al that sought to take advantage of the democratic novelty to obtain power. And the 21st century, beginning within the next decade, will consist largely of the transformation of the soft sciences into hard sciences reflecting groups rather than individuals – because the ‘individualism'(ideal) movement has failed. We evolved as a division of perceptual, cognitive, negotiative, and advocative labor across the generations, among members of kin groups functioning as an intertemporal network of ‘calculation’ of choices. The reason people are unhappy is the attempt to create ‘complete’ individuals instead of ‘complete’ kin groups. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543321910 Timestamp) I make my own butter from heavy cream because I’m so allergic to whatever preservatives they put in it. And standing there with an electric mixer patiently I keep imagining thousands of years of women doing it by hand. And how much work that single task is – just one among the dozens of others required for survival. The endless physical work under agrarianism…. and the archaeological sites that show women’s knee joints and their wear.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    (FB 1543420488 Timestamp) LEAVING THEM ALL BEHIND.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a photo.

    (FB 1543420382 Timestamp) THREE CLASSES OF COERCION (regular repost)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543418196 Timestamp) THE UNIQUENESS OF THE GRAMMARS by Bill Joslin (new, important idea) The development of various grammars of disambiguation defines the uniqueness of the west. A culture of martial raiders requires explicit technologies for maintain peaceful coexistence among dangerous people, as well as requires truthful reporting of battle situations for raiding to be successful. This leads to social value on truth – truthful reporting (reliability) and honest interactions to prevent in-group conflict (honesty). The result being the innovation of OATH (proto-contract) and competency (meritocracy). This I see as the initial step (or early) step toward disambiguation. Disambiguation of reporting on intention and ability. Incremental stages of growth for European peoples can be seen as the progress of disambiguation. Common law : Disambiguation of accountability and disambiguation of reciprocal consequences (punishment fit the crime) Contract: Disambiguation of terms of agreement and limits to commitment (Trade) Institutionalization of Law : Disambiguation of the application of power over a polis i.e. rule (isolation of discretionary rule) Science: disambiguation of external causal relations (Propertarianism – disambiguation of human action and human conflict) Disambiguation provides a commensurable measure in evaluating “western identity” for what belongs or doesn’t belong, or what needs to be corrected and how. So when Abrahamists conflate religion and western civilization (christianity, Jewish contribution, secular islam), or Aesthetics (spiritualists) propose that aesthetics undergirds civilization, or linguists propose language as the means to calculate power and distribution (GA) etc… all while stating they are “for the west”, I get confused and a bit uppity. Introduction of ambiguity is not what we do – its what we’ve been taught by those who’d see us gone or enslaved.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543416288 Timestamp) THE NEXT SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION (worth repeating) This persistent ‘error’ in the soft (projected) ‘sciences’, is, as far as my work goes, the central problem of thought in the 21st century. We are still trying to overcome the monopoly authoritarianism of Boas, Marx, Feud, Adorno et all, Derrida et al, and the feminists et al that sought to take advantage of the democratic novelty to obtain power. And the 21st century, beginning within the next decade, will consist largely of the transformation of the soft sciences into hard sciences reflecting groups rather than individuals – because the ‘individualism'(ideal) movement has failed. We evolved as a division of perceptual, cognitive, negotiative, and advocative labor across the generations, among members of kin groups functioning as an intertemporal network of ‘calculation’ of choices. The reason people are unhappy is the attempt to create ‘complete’ individuals instead of ‘complete’ kin groups. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543496009 Timestamp) ON STYLE Bold to allow for those of us who read quickly to scan by keywords. Capitals for names of Ideas, like “Rationalism”, “Sovereignty”, “Propertarianism”. Parentheticals to bridge operational(technical) and meaningful(familiar) terms, or to limit interpretation. Series and Lists : a sequence of definitions representing a spectrum of terms. The use of series deflates, increases precision, and defeats conflation. First exposure to the methodology’s use and repetition of series tends to both be the most obvious and most helpful of the techniques. Constructions : tracing the path of the development of ideas from primitive to current constructions. Algorithms : general processes for the construction of deflations. Wordy Prose. – Analytic Philosophy is, of necessity, WORDY. – Operational Language is, of necessity, WORDY. – Programming Algorithms is, of necessity, WORDY. – Law, whether Contractual, Legislative, or Constitutional, is WORDY. – Algorithmic Natural Law is of necessity, WORDY. Technical Languages evolve to speak precisely. Precise language contains technical terms and is wordy. Why, if all the other sciences require technical language, would we think that speaking technically in the science of cooperation is not going to be wordy? Well, it’s going to be wordy.