(FB 1542497619 Timestamp) STUDY THE WORLD TODAY A Contemporary “Viking Raid” consists of a few thousand men, pickup trucks with extra gas cans, some generators and pumps for getting fuel, engaging in hit-and-run tactics for food, weapons, supplies, ‘hostages’ (political prisoners), and portable wealth (money). Taking out power, data, water, fuel, bridges, overpasses. Setting fires and retreating to friendly territory, setting up a perimeter, Roasting Whole Cows and Pigs every night, drinking beer, and repeating the same thing tomorrow. That’s the equivalent of a viking raid today.
Form: Short Note
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542680247 Timestamp) “Who Deleted Me?” I go thru the list every now and again, since almost all the unfriends are FB purges, and I’m slowly getting rid of the people who used to work for me (after nine years being out of daily operations, and six out of the role entirely) and that ‘purge’ was something I did to make room for new people. I mean, I have 640 deletes back to 2016.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542645057 Timestamp) FB must be purging because I’ve got 30 open friend slots all of a sudden… lol.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542680247 Timestamp) “Who Deleted Me?” I go thru the list every now and again, since almost all the unfriends are FB purges, and I’m slowly getting rid of the people who used to work for me (after nine years being out of daily operations, and six out of the role entirely) and that ‘purge’ was something I did to make room for new people. I mean, I have 640 deletes back to 2016.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542645057 Timestamp) FB must be purging because I’ve got 30 open friend slots all of a sudden… lol.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542741524 Timestamp) “CHINA HAS SUCCEEDED WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM” —“Are you out of your f-cking mind?”—Jeffrey B (twittiot) Are you offensively ignorant? CHINA: Racism, Nationalism, Supremacy, Military Expansionism, Single Man Rule, Rubber Stamp Bureaucracy, State Capitalism, Unlimited Credit Expansion, Required Employment, Digital Monitoring of Public Reputation, Zero Tolerance, Reeducation Camps. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job. Someone has to compensate for the kind of moron that even questions the obvious.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542717535 Timestamp) ( In interviews, it takes me a while to understand the other person’s ‘frame’, so that I can match it without losing them. So when an interview or conversation starts, in the background, I’m trying to create a ‘plan’ of how to educate the other person. As I build up a bit of understanding, and build out that plan, I can intuit their frame and I can stop working so hard to self monitor my speech. So that’s when the conversation ‘gets going’. I mean, I have to create a chain of reasoning rather than oversimplify the ideas, since that’s a substantial part of the difference in my work. So I feel like I’m working pretty hard in these interviews because if I don’t then I almost always lose the interviewer and the audience. (And then Megan disciplines me for a few weeks…) I’m quite a bit different in person, or on stage because those problems are less challenging in those venues. )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542716470 Timestamp) The military mind is easy to identify. The law enforcement mind is easy to identify. The bureaucratic mind is easy to identify. The house-spook or field-spook mind is easy to identify. The entrepreneurial mind is easy to identify. The working class mind is easy to identify. The labor mind is easy to identify. The (((tribal))) and female minds are easy to identify – on the use of frame alone, and the age and generation minds are easy to identify. The ease of identifying a class of mind is merely experience in doing so and reading the tells. You learn by LISTENING.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542717535 Timestamp) ( In interviews, it takes me a while to understand the other person’s ‘frame’, so that I can match it without losing them. So when an interview or conversation starts, in the background, I’m trying to create a ‘plan’ of how to educate the other person. As I build up a bit of understanding, and build out that plan, I can intuit their frame and I can stop working so hard to self monitor my speech. So that’s when the conversation ‘gets going’. I mean, I have to create a chain of reasoning rather than oversimplify the ideas, since that’s a substantial part of the difference in my work. So I feel like I’m working pretty hard in these interviews because if I don’t then I almost always lose the interviewer and the audience. (And then Megan disciplines me for a few weeks…) I’m quite a bit different in person, or on stage because those problems are less challenging in those venues. )
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1542690595 Timestamp) https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/11/19/bokhari-rise-of-the-western-dissidents/