All norms tend to be suited to demarcating outsiders, the organization of production, and defense – across all of history. Of those I would say production, defense, outsiders is the order.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:29:00 UTC
Form: Short Note
-
Sep 29, 2019, 11:02 AM
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/poll-do-you-think-people-should-be-allowed-carry-guns-public?fbclid=IwAR2OJHTIH-7OjpISPCrcKjTWGavNHmN-Ke-Tm92emRPHVPMxOTwkVsP7pOkUpdated Sep 29, 2019, 11:02 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:02:00 UTC
-
I think the point is that as much as we think in individual terms, FAMILIES MATT
I think the point is that as much as we think in individual terms, FAMILIES MATTER and often matter more.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 00:55:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178110970230640640
Reply addressees: @newbury_eric @razibkhan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178091087187120128
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178091087187120128
-
I love this hashtag #nationaldivorce
I love this hashtag #nationaldivorce https://twitter.com/stevesargent10/status/1178090939652460545
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 00:14:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178100709985849346
https://twitter.com/stevesargent10/status/1178090939652460545
-
NO IT ISN”T COMPLICATED I don’t think anyone has a hard time understanding this
NO IT ISN”T COMPLICATED
I don’t think anyone has a hard time understanding this series at all. We can teach it to a ten year old.
1. Via positiva: golden rule.
2. Via negativa: silver rule.
3. Via logica: reciprocity
4. Via existentia: rule of law, jury, and markets in everything.
Else
5. The Iron Rule: Might makes right
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 14:33:00 UTC
-
( Huh. Got my first death threat from China yesterday. That’s a new one. Jews, M
( Huh. Got my first death threat from China yesterday. That’s a new one. Jews, Muslims, Women, Christians, Fascists, and now Chinese??? Fascinating. I can’t even figure out what I’d say that would be offensive. Not like I disagree with much they do over there. Just lying. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:47:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177942890099724288
-
Proper European Diversity, Brown (me), Red (ex), Blonde (son). lolz (I look horr
Proper European Diversity, Brown (me), Red (ex), Blonde (son). lolz
(I look horrible in this picture. lolz)Updated Sep 28, 2019, 9:59 AM
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 09:59:00 UTC
-
P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence) —-“You
P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)
—-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter
(That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.)
The Methodology:
Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization.
Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.
So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.
The question is only the precision of the measures.
P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 08:31:00 UTC
-
P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence) —-“You
P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)
—-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter
(That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.)
The Methodology:
Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization.
Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.
So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).
Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.
The question is only the precision of the measures.
P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 08:30:00 UTC
-
(movie review, unimportant) I’m from the Ebert school of movie reviews: a movie
(movie review, unimportant)
I’m from the Ebert school of movie reviews: a movie must only deliver on its promise given its budget. And there is a place for saturday afternoon sci fi just… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=473996769863885&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 03:02:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177780477849153537