Gak. No. Confusing Arousal with Consciousness is like confusing the light switch with the light. Just ’cause we can turn off the switch doesn’t tell us how the light is created. We can interfere with any number of parts (Colostrum) and shut down experience. That doesn’t tell us anything. The question is, how does that mushy wetware synthesize past memory present experience, and future prediction, from millions of nerves (measurements) into our rather amazing conflated experiences of past, present and future? (cortical hierarchy, parahippocampal, perirhinal, entorhinal cortices and subiculum.) How do we shift between narrow focus, near perception, environmental perception, self perception, and deep introspection and imagination? (thalamus) Why is it we can react so quickly that we can hit a curve ball with a bat? (basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cortical prediction) How do we Assemble memories and experience them? (Hippocampus) What is that feeling of me? (mostly, hippocampus) Why can’t we pin it down. “Cause it’s a verb not a noun”. The continuous change in state in a hierarchy of ever smaller cycles of time….
Form: Short Note
-
GOAL OF EDUCATION? (See E Michael Jones) The goal of the education system is not
GOAL OF EDUCATION?
(See E Michael Jones)
The goal of the education system is not to control your sexual life (thats intellectually dishonest) it’s to insure you do not by your physical, verbal, social, sexual actions, impose costs upon the rest of us. That’s why we have mandatory education. To limit costly extra people.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 21:23:00 UTC
-
Demarcation
[I] think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy only tells us choice now, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the pyramid is not philosophy but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.
-
Demarcation
[I] think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy only tells us choice now, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the pyramid is not philosophy but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.
-
Perceivable Dimensions
Again. Dimensions.
- Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions.
Identity =(NAMES)
– Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties – Constant Relations between collections of properties.
- Sets = (LANGUAGE)
- Science = (OBSERVATIONS)
- Operational = (ACTIONS)
– Internally consistent (constant, consistent relations), Relations, , .) – Constant relations between collections of references – Empirical, externally correspondent, correlative – Constant Relations between collections of references and reality – Operationally consistent or operationally possible Causation – Constant Relations between collections of references, actions, and reality in time.
- Rational (reasonable) = (RATIONAL INCENTIVE)
(choice) Reciprocity = (RECIPROCAL INCENTIVES)
(cooperation)
This is the full set of dimensions of causality that humans can perceive and compare in order to decide. Each depends upon the one before it. From Eric Danelaw
-
Perceivable Dimensions
Again. Dimensions.
- Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions.
Identity =(NAMES)
– Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties – Constant Relations between collections of properties.
- Sets = (LANGUAGE)
- Science = (OBSERVATIONS)
- Operational = (ACTIONS)
– Internally consistent (constant, consistent relations), Relations, , .) – Constant relations between collections of references – Empirical, externally correspondent, correlative – Constant Relations between collections of references and reality – Operationally consistent or operationally possible Causation – Constant Relations between collections of references, actions, and reality in time.
- Rational (reasonable) = (RATIONAL INCENTIVE)
(choice) Reciprocity = (RECIPROCAL INCENTIVES)
(cooperation)
This is the full set of dimensions of causality that humans can perceive and compare in order to decide. Each depends upon the one before it. From Eric Danelaw
-
(I hope so) š
(I hope so) š https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/i-hope-so/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 20:19:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179853388294557697
-
āModern Day Founding Fathersā
āModern Day Founding Fathersā https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/modern-day-founding-fathers/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 20:15:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179852440767737857
-
What Do People Mean by Trust in Their Government
WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT
[I]n the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors: (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety over the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.
-
What Do People Mean by Trust in Their Government
WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT
[I]n the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors: (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety over the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.