Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • Reversing Genocide, Civilization-cide, Culture-cide, and european tradition of t

    Reversing Genocide, Civilization-cide, Culture-cide, and european tradition of truth before-face, sovereignty and reciprocity, and markets in everything that result, with which we dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty so your heirs have a future not worse than yours.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-07 13:01:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192426963773935618

    Reply addressees: @mrbadtea @NSKinsella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192420382579527680

    IN REPLY TO:

    @mrbadtea

    @curtdoolittle @NSKinsella I think this is silly… What causes are worth fighting for right now? What ideals are there that I’m willing to loose my family, friends, way of life, job…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192420382579527680

  • This is Advanced P-Operationalism, with 20thc Problem = Poincare-Cantor, Hilbert

    This is Advanced P-Operationalism, with 20thc Problem = Poincare-Cantor, Hilbert-Einstein, Hayek-Keynes, Turing-Godel, Doolittle-Mises, with Bridgman (Physics) understanding Einstein partial success without understanding Einstein’s failure. Hilbert failure understanding Brouwer.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 17:17:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192128813842542592

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192125302480277505

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthRespecter 1) He’s gay and British. 2) He’s marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating marx in quantitative redistributive innumeracy; 4) He did not understand the consequences to capital; 5) Nor how people would run with it; 6) Hayek did but he lacked the language (or didn’t use it).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192125302480277505

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @TruthRespecter 1) He’s gay and British. 2) He’s marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating marx in quantitative redistributive innumeracy; 4) He did not understand the consequences to capital; 5) Nor how people would run with it; 6) Hayek did but he lacked the language (or didn’t use it).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192125302480277505

  • Got instructions from ‘the management’ to invest in Brandon, Luke and a few othe

    Got instructions from ‘the management’ to invest in Brandon, Luke and a few others I won’t name. Truth is Stepan is better online than I am, and Alain is close. And it’s thrilling, Brandon can be. … But I want to explain why I’m cautious with investments. And that’s because by trying to accelerates one’s journey we always and everywhere interfere and anchor that journey. And for intellectual excellence to emerge in any individual he must produce and OWN his journey. So it is only helpful to provide positive reinforcement, and to ‘advise’ on ‘near misses’. This means keeping an eye on something and investing in ‘expanding gupon’ any given insight they have. So one can ‘instruct a body of people in foundations. You can play king of the hill to teach afterward. But you can only give subtle assistance upon request if you want to make fellow ‘kings’. This method of teaching requires knowledge skill, and must only progress over time. And this is why I am increasingly hostile to our prussian industrialized education system – which is suitable only for girls and the underclasses, and not at all suitable for boys and men – who if anything must learn to compete in individually, in groups, and in tribes (armies) to care enough to invest in themselves, their families, their societies and their people.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 15:23:00 UTC

  • Most advanced subject in P-Operationalism, that so far I can’t find a single per

    Most advanced subject in P-Operationalism, that so far I can’t find a single person that grasps it – even though my video on the 20th century of mysticism has been around forever..

    —“A preference for truth or for sincerity as a method may be prejudice based on some personal standard, inconsistent, in politics, with practical good”– – Keynes

    —“Is Keynes, (an Anglo aristocrat?) in the same tradition as The Enemy or is it a different type of lying?”–@TruthRespecter

    1) He’s British, Eccentric, Wealthy, and Gay 2) He’s a marxist (it’s in his notes) 3) He’s restating marx in quantitative redistributive innumeracy (mathematical pseudoscience) 4) He did not understand the consequences to capital – hayek sure did; 5) Nor how people would run with it; 6) Hayek did and thought he should counter him, but he lacked the language (or didn’t use it).

    This is Advanced P-Operationalism, where the 20thc Problem with the sciences is consistent between (right-wrong): Poincare-Cantor, Hilbert-Einstein, Hayek-Keynes, Turing-Godel, Doolittle-Mises,

    With Bridgman (Physics) understanding Einstein’s partial success without understanding Einstein’s failure. Hilbert’s failure understanding Brouwer, and his failure to correct Einstein as has led to the current condition where

    Economics is frozen and off the rails

    Physical science is frozen and off the rails

    No progress has been made in law, political science, or social science.

    Education in general is a catastrophe.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 12:28:00 UTC

  • I set enormous goals, plan them out, and then work away at them over years. That

    I set enormous goals, plan them out, and then work away at them over years. That includes my businesses, my intellectual work, and the conversion of the institute into an college. The reason few people accomplish big things is because they lack the discipline to work for years.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 12:20:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192054235925532672

    Reply addressees: @Slackhurst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192053315527417856

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Slackhurst I write in Technical Language on a technical subject, of Testifiability, Reciprocity, Decidability, and Law. Calculus, physics, economics, and algorithmic operations are not false or unclear just because they’re HARD. If you need children’s books, teen, or pop lit, follow others.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192053315527417856

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Slackhurst I write in Technical Language on a technical subject, of Testifiability, Reciprocity, Decidability, and Law. Calculus, physics, economics, and algorithmic operations are not false or unclear just because they’re HARD. If you need children’s books, teen, or pop lit, follow others.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1192053315527417856

  • I write in Technical Language on a technical subject, of Testifiability, Recipro

    I write in Technical Language on a technical subject, of Testifiability, Reciprocity, Decidability, and Law. Calculus, physics, economics, and algorithmic operations are not false or unclear just because they’re HARD. If you need children’s books, teen, or pop lit, follow others.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-06 12:17:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1192053315527417856

    Reply addressees: @Slackhurst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191378002648666112

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Slackhurst

    @curtdoolittle Vox Day is not a very nice person, but he writes in clear language and makes projects happen. This guy’s writing has all the clarity of a puddle of vomit and most of the “courses” on his website don’t exist.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191378002648666112

  • All, I am occasionally asked where I should direct christians, and I say either

    All,

    I am occasionally asked where I should direct christians, and I say either to Vox or to James. I follow James. I pay no attention to Vox. I sometimes pay attention to EMJ.

    But… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=500491240547771&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 23:22:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191858387203571718

  • 2019-11-05

    2019-11-05

    https://t.co/vmDEITcnlV

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 21:29:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191829826929332227

  • JESUS While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus

    JESUS

    While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus gave us the only ‘scientific’ improvement on the natural law. The ONLY ONE EVER IN HISTORY. That’s why he’s important for mankind. Every other person who tried to deliver that message whether european, or hindu or buddhist, sinic or semite failed – spectacularly.

    I do true. That’s all have to do. True is always better. ALl of history is excessively concerned with good even if false.

    I do true.

    Jesus is correct because made a true claim in the only language and paradigm he understood.

    I don’t have that problem. I can speak in parsimonious natural law and say he spoke a truth even if not truthfully – simply because he couldn’t.

    Unfortunately his insight was used to destroy and decline rather than expand and improve.

    Which is something we can do that he couldn’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-05 12:31:00 UTC

  • Reacted inappropriately to a request by someone to debate or talk with me. links

    Reacted inappropriately to a request by someone to debate or talk with me. links sent to me. I responded.

    Internal swiping is never helpful. We need every tribe.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 20:34:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191453697001377793

    Reply addressees: @Richard_Heathen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191282610254729217

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191282610254729217