photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/80058450_527950051135223_5146695281147904000_o_527950047801890.jpg
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-12 14:38:00 UTC
Form: Short Note
-
Feminine Cognition, and “GSRRM”
Feminine Cognition, and “GSRRM” https://t.co/3BsivicDe6
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-12 01:31:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204936721181429761
Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204936532152463361
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Steve_Sailer What the opposite(female cognition), and all leftists tend to do, consciously or not, is DISAPPROVE of statements by circumvention operational possibility, distribution of ability, consequences over time, and kantian imperative, by use of DENIAL, SOPHISM, PSEUDOSCIENCE and GSRRM.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204936532152463361
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Steve_Sailer What the opposite(female cognition), and all leftists tend to do, consciously or not, is DISAPPROVE of statements by circumvention operational possibility, distribution of ability, consequences over time, and kantian imperative, by use of DENIAL, SOPHISM, PSEUDOSCIENCE and GSRRM.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204936532152463361
-
I know my job. I’ve been open about it. My job is to provide a compromise soluti
I know my job. I’ve been open about it. My job is to provide a compromise solution whose rejection can only be immoral, at which point, their pretense of morality lost, and so is our pretence of mercy. I want it so certain, that they settle. And settlement is a win.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-12 01:14:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204932452130709505
Reply addressees: @YvesBurri
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204925513791229952
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204925513791229952
-
Facebook got it right again. Restored post on Churchill’s instigation of the War
Facebook got it right again. Restored post on Churchill’s instigation of the War.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 16:53:00 UTC
-
THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF LYING —“Because they have genetically, culturally,
THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF LYING
—“Because they have genetically, culturally, theologically, and argumentatively institutionalized the art of LYING just as I’ve illustrated. False promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism, polymoralism, half truths, cherry picking) critique (undermining, straw manning, GSRRM).”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 12:11:00 UTC
-
“Under P-Law Horowitz would be prosecutable for extraordinary damages for failur
—“Under P-Law Horowitz would be prosecutable for extraordinary damages for failure of full accounting and failure of strict construction when making (promising) an assertion (claim) without qualifying the chain of causality.
Under P-law none of this political deceit is possible.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 12:11:00 UTC
-
Ending the Eugenic movement (limiting reproduction of people demonstrating crimi
Ending the Eugenic movement (limiting reproduction of people demonstrating criminal, psychological, or otherwise defective behaviors), in the postwar era was the most significant catastrophe since the Christianization of Rome, and the Muslim Conquest.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 03:53:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204610023441211392
Reply addressees: @RebeccaBuxton
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198641545177706506
IN REPLY TO:
@RebeccaBuxton
quote retweet this with your most controversial philosophical opinion
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1198641545177706506
-
I don’t want to lose Nationalist’s Point amid the Porn Dispute. These arguments
I don’t want to lose Nationalist’s Point amid the Porn Dispute. These arguments are just evidence that we have to separate, and isolate, and then let the cities fall into decay of their own accord – and force people to stay in them – or face years of retraining (reconditioning).
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 02:46:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204593220044382208
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204393489485697024
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204393489485697024
-
Personally (not the natural law) I have come to understand that while I’m intuit
Personally (not the natural law) I have come to understand that while I’m intuitively libertarian, the experiment with porn is that it’s a net negative, but that it is better to regulate a net negative than it is to turn it into a black market. I’d ban it in my neck of the woods.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 02:44:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204592641482072071
Reply addressees: @EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204592037296820225
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346 And beyond that it’s a Political question (“We just don’t want it here”), or an empirical question (“Accumulate evidence and inability to voluntarily or institutionally regulate means we have to ban it.”).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204592037296820225
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@EnlightenedNPC @Nationalist7346 And beyond that it’s a Political question (“We just don’t want it here”), or an empirical question (“Accumulate evidence and inability to voluntarily or institutionally regulate means we have to ban it.”).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204592037296820225
-
@realDonaldTrump #Conservatives #Libertarians
@realDonaldTrump #Conservatives #Libertarians https://t.co/Qpp22fcEQa
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 18:04:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204461954187845632