Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • WESTERN ARISTOCRACY TESTIFIES Greg’s comment that GSRRM is witness intimidation

    WESTERN ARISTOCRACY TESTIFIES

    Greg’s comment that GSRRM is witness intimidation and his suggestion that we maintain a consistent western paradigm accessible to the people sparked an insight that I had to stew on overnight. But it consists of three parts: first that we have always used both positive religious and negative judicial priesthoods – even though we invented philosophy as a bridge. That westerners are always testifying as if before thang or court, or reporting as if before officers. That our piety is both judicial and aspirational. And that our commons of truth is the result of this compartmentalisation of ethics and our justification of action across the spectrum from intolerant law to forgiving religion thereby providing both maximal opportunity and graceful failure on one end and maximum decidability and intolerance exposing failure on the other.Updated Feb 4, 2020, 10:46 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 10:46:00 UTC

  • THE MONARCHY UNDER THE ONE LAW by Bill Joslin Under One Law, where by no group o

    THE MONARCHY UNDER THE ONE LAW

    by Bill Joslin

    Under One Law, where by no group or individual obtains the power to write law, the king can be under law without the risk of molestation by politicians. I’d say, evidenced by Charle’s decapitated body, this One Law is already enforced by nature whether we agree, understand, notice or not. Its just a matter of what time horizon the judgements are passed. by aligning with this One Law, and decreasing latency between act and judgment, we can use nature to create the disincentive with in the actors lifetime and avoid the tails of damages breaking One Law creates.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 22:08:00 UTC

  • THE SOVEREIGN IS ABOVE EARTHLY POWERS UNDER LAW, NOT ABOVE NATURAL LAW by Scott

    THE SOVEREIGN IS ABOVE EARTHLY POWERS UNDER LAW, NOT ABOVE NATURAL LAW

    by Scott De Warren

    A sovereign is above the law in the sense that there is no earthly legal power above him in his kingdom.

    He is not above natural law, however, in the sense that his sovereignty is not inalienable. For example if he seeks to destroy his kingdom and people or other crimes similar in kind to high treason (selling his sovereignty to a hostile foreign sovereign and thus stripping his people of their liberties) he can lose his sovereign rights in a just revolution (but not his legal heirs already born).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 22:07:00 UTC

  • THE 20th EXPERIMENT IN COSMPOLITAINISM FAILED The constitution failed when men f

    THE 20th EXPERIMENT IN COSMPOLITAINISM FAILED

    The constitution failed when men failed: they denied southerners sovereignty – the premise upon which the constitution is founded. And it failed for no other reason than to prevent the agrarian south from control of the continent isolating the puritan industrial north from control over western expansion. The only reason Lincoln didn’t continue the existing repatriation of slaves to africa was the cost. yet what was the cost of 500,000 lives, our constitution, and our sovereignty? Why? Because white men – Pres. Lincoln in this case – granted black leaders at the time their sovereignty by asking it of them. To lead it. Rather than for americans to force it. Why do we make the same mistake today with all other aliens? If you seek to take our sovereignty, then by reciprocity we shall seek to take yours. If you cannot or will not integrate then we have no choice but to separate.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 22:02:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGIN OF MORAL FOUNDATIONS by Bill Joslin The first question of ethics and

    THE ORIGIN OF MORAL FOUNDATIONS

    by Bill Joslin

    The first question of ethics and politics is: “Why shouldn’t I kill you and take your stuff?” The answer to which gives birth to moral foundations.

    Of course, “Because I’m too costly to kill when weighed against the benefit of my stuff” represents one of the answers.

    The other answer being this: “Because, if we cooperate, I’m worth way more alive than the limited benefits of the stuff I have now.”

    To wit – any and all qualities that we consider “virtuous” can be measured. Virtue exists as the signaling and behaviour that demonstrates your ability to be trusted when one is vulnerable to you (i.e. answers the question of “why would I drop my defenses against you in order to cooperate).

    …now here the rub.

    Our current culture hasn’t solved for this contingent question:

    “Why shouldn’t I just lie to you and take your stuff, only the amount of stuff you don’t notice I took?”

    Me’thinks this question will be answered soon.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 21:49:00 UTC

  • 12182 pieces of orbital debris. 2161 spent rocket stages in orbit, 4790 satellit

    12182 pieces of orbital debris.

    2161 spent rocket stages in orbit,

    4790 satellites,

    25 objects in orbit not yet assigned,

    Less than 2000 satellite are alive

    261 are Communications

    178 are Military

    98 are GPS

    This is not a subject I have knowlege of. I don’t know the rest, and even these numbers are only rough. Yes, there are databases. Multiple. They’re detailed.

    —GPS—

    74 Global Positioning System navigation satellites have been launched, 31 of which are operational, 9 in reserve, 2 being tested, 30 have been retired and 2 were lost at launch.

    There are currently 5 Positioning and Navigation satellite systems.

    1) GPS (USA)

    2) GLONASS (Russia)

    3) Galileo (European Union)

    4) BeiDou (China)

    5) NAVIC (India)

    GPS has 31 satellites in orbit.

    GLONASS has 24 satellites in orbit.

    Galileo has 14 satellites in orbit.

    BeiDou has 22 satellites in orbit.

    NAVIC has 7 satellites in orbit.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 20:58:00 UTC

  • Yes P is a universalist program. It says that all people can transcend ignorance

    Yes P is a universalist program. It says that all people can transcend ignorance, superstition, fraud, baiting into hazard, rent seeking, organized crime, corruption, tyranny, hard labor, poverty, disease, suffering, conversion, immigration, conquest if they adopt P-rule of law with universal standing in the commons, state-private capital investment, state consumer credit, and SOFT EUGENICS. But that if you don’t adopt soft eugenics and rule of law then you will not be able to do any of the above with any degree of certainty for any substantial period of time. P is just physics applied to social science.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 20:13:00 UTC

  • #Trump Explaining Trump

    #Trump Explaining Trump https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1224358599272607747

  • POWERS OF THE BRITISH MONARCHY (as of 2003) (via a friend) Summary. If the queen

    POWERS OF THE BRITISH MONARCHY

    (as of 2003) (via a friend)

    Summary. If the queen has the loyalty of the armed forces she can do anything she wishes. The only practical means of her action is in crisis, if the government fails.

    The Monarch is Sovereign

    People are her subjects (family, wards)

    Above the law and immune from prosecution

    Diplomatic immunity anywhere on earth

    Exempt from FOI requests

    No passport nor driving license

    No taxes

    Commander in chief of all armed forces, who are sworn to her, not the state

    The making of treaties

    Declaration of war

    Deployment of armed forces overseas

    Recognition of foreign states

    Accreditation and reception of diplomats

    Appointment of Queen’s Counsel (Cabinet)

    The appointment and regulation of the civil service

    The appointment and dismissal of ministers, including the prime minister.

    The summoning, prorogation and dissolution of Parliament

    Royal assent to bills (or veto)

    Consent before any law that affects the monarchy can be even discussed.

    BUT!!! …. Cannot create law, only assent or veto – this is the cornerstone.

    (And can bring in the army if she wants to enforce it)

    Issue and revoke passports

    Arrest, seize, anything commander anything at will

    Administer punishments at will prerogative to keep the peace

    Creation of corporations by Charter

    Granting honours

    Prerogative of mercy

    Even over their souls – head of the church.

    Only revolution can replace her.

    Which is how it should be.

    Devoted to public service

    Limits her opinions to saying nothing

    Specializes in ‘soft power’.

    Most powerful woman in the world.

    The commissioning of officers in the armed forces

    Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 16:15:00 UTC

  • NO??? OPEN ..Liberal Conservatives (Libcons) ………Normie-cons …………..

    NO???

    OPEN
    ..Liberal Conservatives (Libcons)
    ………Normie-cons
    …………..CivNats
    ………………..Libertarians
    ……………………..Alt-R-Cons (DOMINANCE)
    ………………..NeoCons
    ……………Constitution-cons
    ………Trad(family)-cons
    .Jesus-cons
    CLOSED

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 14:50:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224344309408903169