Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • P Logic in Relationships

    [Y]ou don’t use P-logic to argue with your wife, girlfriend – even if you probably should use it with your daughters. You use P to UNDERSTAND your wife or girlfriend, so that you can ask the right questions and give the right answers.

    —“I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated discussion that her emotions were simply a response to a perceived change in property.”—Michael Churchill

    The most important of which isn’t to tell her her feelings are wrong, or her desires are wrong, but whether they are possible or not, and whether they would achieve desired ends or not. Women need you to listen while they work through suppressing the emotion and impulse. They need you to support them as they work through those thoughts impulses and emotions so that you relieve them of the burden of doing it alone. And they need you to help them come to a conclusion on their own – just as they help you through your male anger or frustration when it clouds your vision. And they need you to say ‘no’ when it’s your fking job to say ‘these are the limits’ beyond which you are not willing to go – and not apologize for it. Be a man. Give her room to exercise emotional frustration by emotional expression like you exercise emotional frustration by physical expression.

  • P Logic in Relationships

    [Y]ou don’t use P-logic to argue with your wife, girlfriend – even if you probably should use it with your daughters. You use P to UNDERSTAND your wife or girlfriend, so that you can ask the right questions and give the right answers.

    —“I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated discussion that her emotions were simply a response to a perceived change in property.”—Michael Churchill

    The most important of which isn’t to tell her her feelings are wrong, or her desires are wrong, but whether they are possible or not, and whether they would achieve desired ends or not. Women need you to listen while they work through suppressing the emotion and impulse. They need you to support them as they work through those thoughts impulses and emotions so that you relieve them of the burden of doing it alone. And they need you to help them come to a conclusion on their own – just as they help you through your male anger or frustration when it clouds your vision. And they need you to say ‘no’ when it’s your fking job to say ‘these are the limits’ beyond which you are not willing to go – and not apologize for it. Be a man. Give her room to exercise emotional frustration by emotional expression like you exercise emotional frustration by physical expression.

  • Thinking Things Thru Is Scary

      —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan —“Faith without works is free riding. It’s a crime. ;)”—Curt Doolittle —“Faith without works is: 1 – Baiting into hazard for oneself in both religious and logical terms, 2 – Making an unfalsifiable promise to the commons (i.e believe in Jesus and be saved in afterlife), 3 – Parasitism on others within the higher-trust group of other faithful All of which are violations of reciprocity. Even though faith attempts to define reciprocity as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” it lacks the grammar to break it down to what it really means and how to apply it. P. solves that problem.”—James Dmitro Makienko

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/87867222_580106869252874_21033796080

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/87867222_580106869252874_21033796080

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/87867222_580106869252874_2103379608089919488_o_580106862586208.jpg Update b/c Italian data. Slowly accumulate basics that will run out. Now we will get to learn why ‘really efficient supply chains’ are a really f—king bad idea. As for markets, well, this problem will get solved so think in terms of discovering buying opportunities on those investments that will not be victims of world supply chain contractions.Update b/c Italian data. Slowly accumulate basics that will run out. Now we will get to learn why ‘really efficient supply chains’ are a really f—king bad idea. As for markets, well, this problem will get solved so think in terms of discovering buying opportunities on those investments that will not be victims of world supply chain contractions.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:04:00 UTC

  • The Qualia of Geometry Is Uniform

    THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM by Andrew M Gilmour (core) If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.

    CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.

  • The Qualia of Geometry Is Uniform

    THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM by Andrew M Gilmour (core) If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.

    CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.

  • Science Preserving Faith

    [T]hey means of preserving the faith under the science of gods as information, is that while protocol is behavior, and the transmission between people (nodes, modules) is slow (in itself a survival technique), it is possible that the host (body of the faithful) functions as a collectively subconscious organism, and that given synchronicity, we all operate as if there were a physical connection, when in fact, the only connection is the information we are subject to by our sense, perception, auto-association. This provides a rational and scientific explanation for why religion does work despite the pantheon of grammars we express it in. It explains the value of Jesus and nature for the submissive (uncompetitive) and the traditional(dominant, competitive) european gods as dominance expression. This ends the problem of the multiplicity of conflicting gods, and the evident and undeniable failure of gods in all material things, and that god created the universe, but leaves the rest of theology intact. So this leaves us with a scientific view of every religion that does not seek to dominate any other religion, and falsifies every religion that does seek to dominate other religions. Furthermore, it explains the western pantheon of scientific, normative-legal, ideal philosophical and theological grammars as satisfying the language of each group of ‘gods’ in our pantheon. If you pray to your god, talk to your god, or think in the language of your deity, or your deism, you will participate in the construction of that ‘will’.

  • Science Preserving Faith

    [T]hey means of preserving the faith under the science of gods as information, is that while protocol is behavior, and the transmission between people (nodes, modules) is slow (in itself a survival technique), it is possible that the host (body of the faithful) functions as a collectively subconscious organism, and that given synchronicity, we all operate as if there were a physical connection, when in fact, the only connection is the information we are subject to by our sense, perception, auto-association. This provides a rational and scientific explanation for why religion does work despite the pantheon of grammars we express it in. It explains the value of Jesus and nature for the submissive (uncompetitive) and the traditional(dominant, competitive) european gods as dominance expression. This ends the problem of the multiplicity of conflicting gods, and the evident and undeniable failure of gods in all material things, and that god created the universe, but leaves the rest of theology intact. So this leaves us with a scientific view of every religion that does not seek to dominate any other religion, and falsifies every religion that does seek to dominate other religions. Furthermore, it explains the western pantheon of scientific, normative-legal, ideal philosophical and theological grammars as satisfying the language of each group of ‘gods’ in our pantheon. If you pray to your god, talk to your god, or think in the language of your deity, or your deism, you will participate in the construction of that ‘will’.

  • Recent: Inalienability

    Recent Work: Most of my offline work tries to solve inalienability under sovereignty. inalienation: “You cannot surrender your rights without surrendering your sovereignty and thereby defecting from and committing treason against your peers.” The more I learned P the angrier I became at the postwar jewish invasion of western thought. But the more I understand our original group strategy and our law, the more complete it is and the more ELEGANT it is as an extension of the laws of nature – rather than one that seeks to deceive men.

  • Recent: Inalienability

    Recent Work: Most of my offline work tries to solve inalienability under sovereignty. inalienation: “You cannot surrender your rights without surrendering your sovereignty and thereby defecting from and committing treason against your peers.” The more I learned P the angrier I became at the postwar jewish invasion of western thought. But the more I understand our original group strategy and our law, the more complete it is and the more ELEGANT it is as an extension of the laws of nature – rather than one that seeks to deceive men.