RT @Outsideness: Steve in buzzkill mode. https://www.takimag.com/article/secession-studies/
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-04 21:17:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1235313512840384518
Form: Short Note
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-04 00:13:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234995300344840192
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-04 00:13:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234995297387982850
-
Feminine brain structure (bias verbal, experiential, in time) vs masculine brain
Feminine brain structure (bias verbal, experiential, in time) vs masculine brain structure (bias physical, action, over time). Look at male vs female writers in any subject.
Compare a female tv anchor and male talking head. Then at WRITING and RESEARCH by the right vs the left.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 15:02:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234856557948567553
Reply addressees: @90_guillem
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234849815911174155
-
P Creates “Intellectual Conservatism”
P CREATES CONSERVATIVE INTELLECTUALISM The problem of course is that while the founders were intellectuals, while Burke and Tocqueville were intellectuals, the postwar conservatives were not intellectuals – for reasons we can understand today, as the incompatibility of (a) meritless franchise, (b) the natural eugenics of western aristocratic and egalitarianism, rule of law, and markets in everything; (c) and the darwinian revolution that explained the success of western civilization, and (d) the prewar and postwar, primarily catholic, and later jewish revolt against all of the above, culminating it its overthrow during the sixties revolt against darwinian civilization. Conservative=Capitalizing Tribe long term, Libertarian=Producing Self middle term., Progressive=Hyperconsumptive short term.
-
P Creates “Intellectual Conservatism”
P CREATES CONSERVATIVE INTELLECTUALISM The problem of course is that while the founders were intellectuals, while Burke and Tocqueville were intellectuals, the postwar conservatives were not intellectuals – for reasons we can understand today, as the incompatibility of (a) meritless franchise, (b) the natural eugenics of western aristocratic and egalitarianism, rule of law, and markets in everything; (c) and the darwinian revolution that explained the success of western civilization, and (d) the prewar and postwar, primarily catholic, and later jewish revolt against all of the above, culminating it its overthrow during the sixties revolt against darwinian civilization. Conservative=Capitalizing Tribe long term, Libertarian=Producing Self middle term., Progressive=Hyperconsumptive short term.
-
“You’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)”
“You’re Confusing Anti-Semitism (genetics) with Anti-Abrahamism (‘argument’)” https://propertarianism.com/2020/03/03/youre-confusing-anti-semitism-genetics-with-anti-abrahamism-argument/
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 12:58:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234825545575256065
-
Group Strategies
Group Strategies https://propertarianism.com/2020/03/03/group-strategies/
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 12:48:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234822999985065984
-
What Worldwide Intellectual Elites Exist?
WHAT WORLD-INTELLECTUAL ELITES EXIST? 1. European Aristotelian 2. Ashkenazi Jewish Abrahamic. 3. The Chinese Act rather than Talk, they don’t create universals, the run their civilization out of self interest. Confucianism isn’t argumentative or combative like scientific truth or abrahamic undermining. 4. If India has intellectual elites they’re invisible to us primarily because they are concentrating as are the Chinese on their own. 5. There are no islamic intellectual elites because it’s an anti intellectual civilization in the sense we meant it as innovative. (open to criticism on this)
-
What Worldwide Intellectual Elites Exist?
WHAT WORLD-INTELLECTUAL ELITES EXIST? 1. European Aristotelian 2. Ashkenazi Jewish Abrahamic. 3. The Chinese Act rather than Talk, they don’t create universals, the run their civilization out of self interest. Confucianism isn’t argumentative or combative like scientific truth or abrahamic undermining. 4. If India has intellectual elites they’re invisible to us primarily because they are concentrating as are the Chinese on their own. 5. There are no islamic intellectual elites because it’s an anti intellectual civilization in the sense we meant it as innovative. (open to criticism on this)