What’s Wrong with Ireland? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/26/whats-wrong-with-ireland/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-26 01:18:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265089811985170433
What’s Wrong with Ireland? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/26/whats-wrong-with-ireland/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-26 01:18:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265089811985170433
Don’t Come to A Juridical Scientist and Try to Justify Abrahamic Religions – You Can’t. They’re Frauds. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/26/dont-come-to-a-juridical-scientist-and-try-to-justify-abrahamic-religions-you-cant-theyre-frauds/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-26 01:17:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265089563753680897
I Don”t Complain About Races. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/26/i-dont-complain-about-races/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-26 01:16:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265089343389081600
Female Hierarchies Are Not Scalable https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/26/female-hierarchies-are-not-scalable/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-26 01:15:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265089150132371456
Jan 9, 2020, 3:53 PM UPDATE: Video of missile striking plane.
—“According to the U.S. official U.S. intelligence is confident that Iran painted the Ukrainian airliner with radar and fired two surface to air missiles that brought down the aircraft.”—
That particular phrasing means it happened. US military intel can see any ‘painting’ of a plane using radar, especially in Iran. So Ukraine follows Russia as shooting down an airliner in the past decade – something that has become a rarity with IFF signals, better radars, and computer technology. In 2014 Russians in Donetsk shot down a Malay airliner In 2001 Ukrainians shot down a Siberian airliner In 2001 Peru shot down a small plane misidentified by CIA In 1992 the Azerbaijanis shot down an Armenian Airliner In 1988 the USA shot down an Iranian airliner.!!!! In 1983 the Russians shot down a Korean Airliner+ In 1980 the Zambians shot down an Angolan Airliner In 1980 the Libyans shot down an Italian Airliner+ In 1978 the Soviets shot down a Korean Airliner+ In 1973 the Israelis shot down a Libyan Airline+ In 1962 the Soviets shot down their own Airliner In 1954 the Chinese shot down a Cathay Airliner In 1943 the Germans shot down a British Airliner+ (+ Means intentional. Most of these are accidents.) There are quite a few others, but they are all the actions of rebels, insurgents, or terrorists. There are of course many bombings and Hijackings but those are again, rebels, insurgents, or terrorists.
Jan 9, 2020, 3:53 PM UPDATE: Video of missile striking plane.
—“According to the U.S. official U.S. intelligence is confident that Iran painted the Ukrainian airliner with radar and fired two surface to air missiles that brought down the aircraft.”—
That particular phrasing means it happened. US military intel can see any ‘painting’ of a plane using radar, especially in Iran. So Ukraine follows Russia as shooting down an airliner in the past decade – something that has become a rarity with IFF signals, better radars, and computer technology. In 2014 Russians in Donetsk shot down a Malay airliner In 2001 Ukrainians shot down a Siberian airliner In 2001 Peru shot down a small plane misidentified by CIA In 1992 the Azerbaijanis shot down an Armenian Airliner In 1988 the USA shot down an Iranian airliner.!!!! In 1983 the Russians shot down a Korean Airliner+ In 1980 the Zambians shot down an Angolan Airliner In 1980 the Libyans shot down an Italian Airliner+ In 1978 the Soviets shot down a Korean Airliner+ In 1973 the Israelis shot down a Libyan Airline+ In 1962 the Soviets shot down their own Airliner In 1954 the Chinese shot down a Cathay Airliner In 1943 the Germans shot down a British Airliner+ (+ Means intentional. Most of these are accidents.) There are quite a few others, but they are all the actions of rebels, insurgents, or terrorists. There are of course many bombings and Hijackings but those are again, rebels, insurgents, or terrorists.
Jan 10, 2020, 12:02 PM The problem is, that as neoteny increases so apparently does possibility mental illness, and ‘the pill’ increases possibility of mental illness – so the masculine brain (autism spectrum) is the only defense against the two sides (agency, mental illness) of neoteny (slowing and limiting rate and depth of maturity). Ties into Bill’s Post: FAILURE POINTS: MALE, PACK, (K) vs FEMALE, HERD, (R) by Bill Joslin Friend or Foe Detection Failures for Each Bias: 1. FEMALE: far left presume everyone is a friend (Failed Foe Detection) 2. MALE: failed right presume everyone’s an enemy (Failed Friend Detection Theres a biological component when factoring in female in-group preference which spikes with oxy. Females under higher oxy have higher ingroup preference and higher threat alertness. males don’t have this same dynamic. My speculation is that females trigger threat warnings earlier (on sight, at a distances). Males, who need to investigate the threat, can’t have the same spike. They investigate and upon receiving threaten signals from the stranger, then they spike in ingroup preference. And that seems to play out less as hatred for the outgroup, and more as “taking care on my brothers” different expression of ingroup preference. The former being outgroup aversion (offensive), the later being ingroup care(defensive). Edit
Jan 10, 2020, 12:02 PM The problem is, that as neoteny increases so apparently does possibility mental illness, and ‘the pill’ increases possibility of mental illness – so the masculine brain (autism spectrum) is the only defense against the two sides (agency, mental illness) of neoteny (slowing and limiting rate and depth of maturity). Ties into Bill’s Post: FAILURE POINTS: MALE, PACK, (K) vs FEMALE, HERD, (R) by Bill Joslin Friend or Foe Detection Failures for Each Bias: 1. FEMALE: far left presume everyone is a friend (Failed Foe Detection) 2. MALE: failed right presume everyone’s an enemy (Failed Friend Detection Theres a biological component when factoring in female in-group preference which spikes with oxy. Females under higher oxy have higher ingroup preference and higher threat alertness. males don’t have this same dynamic. My speculation is that females trigger threat warnings earlier (on sight, at a distances). Males, who need to investigate the threat, can’t have the same spike. They investigate and upon receiving threaten signals from the stranger, then they spike in ingroup preference. And that seems to play out less as hatred for the outgroup, and more as “taking care on my brothers” different expression of ingroup preference. The former being outgroup aversion (offensive), the later being ingroup care(defensive). Edit
Jan 10, 2020, 12:57 PM by Brandon Hayes Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth; it’s 2020. Take a good look at it. Look at it again. If you don’t like it, there’s a single way to change it; accept it and modify it along the lines of natural law; reciprocity; and make something of it for yourself. You’re brilliant and technologically advanced; only your addictions and lies stand in your way. Accepting reality isn’t a burden; that’s always been a lie. A lie to keep you from seeing the simple truth. Life is simple and beautifully so. You want Eden; this is the closest you get with resorting to fantasy. No lies; just calculation for cooperation. Worried about restitution, P’s got it in spades. Let those most fit to bear the burdens of the world bear them as they ought; know it’s your duty to do your damnedest not to add to this burden; the attempts to fit round pegs into square holes and similar unfruitful endeavors ought cease. We have acted in a counter-productive fashion long enough. P does parsimony so you can do action. I’m not interested in your abstract expressions nor your virtue signals… can you be the change you scream about needing so badly? Cause now’s your chance.
Jan 10, 2020, 12:57 PM by Brandon Hayes Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth; it’s 2020. Take a good look at it. Look at it again. If you don’t like it, there’s a single way to change it; accept it and modify it along the lines of natural law; reciprocity; and make something of it for yourself. You’re brilliant and technologically advanced; only your addictions and lies stand in your way. Accepting reality isn’t a burden; that’s always been a lie. A lie to keep you from seeing the simple truth. Life is simple and beautifully so. You want Eden; this is the closest you get with resorting to fantasy. No lies; just calculation for cooperation. Worried about restitution, P’s got it in spades. Let those most fit to bear the burdens of the world bear them as they ought; know it’s your duty to do your damnedest not to add to this burden; the attempts to fit round pegs into square holes and similar unfruitful endeavors ought cease. We have acted in a counter-productive fashion long enough. P does parsimony so you can do action. I’m not interested in your abstract expressions nor your virtue signals… can you be the change you scream about needing so badly? Cause now’s your chance.