We do (Propertarians);
– reciprocal (productive) vs irreciprocal ( parasitic) – testifiable vs untestifiable – truthful and untruthful You do (Others):
– approval or rejection (feminine) – desirable or undesirable (feminine) – proportional or disproportional. (feminine lef) – moral or immoral (christian right) – right or wrong. (masculine right) – true or false (everyone)
We do (Propertarians);
– reciprocal (productive) vs irreciprocal ( parasitic) – testifiable vs untestifiable – truthful and untruthful You do (Others):
– approval or rejection (feminine) – desirable or undesirable (feminine) – proportional or disproportional. (feminine lef) – moral or immoral (christian right) – right or wrong. (masculine right) – true or false (everyone)
Oct 30, 2019, 11:36 AM I can stand on a stage, with a half dozen P-Teachers, present an idea, and have the audience and the teachers handle the question. We face one challenge that we are only now starting to overcome, and that until recently we needed to write P. It seems we can speak it now because we’re familiar enough with the method. So that conference, promoted, is what we will need. We need a poster with ‘all of P’ in logarithmic form. (I have it in the courseware. )
Oct 30, 2019, 11:36 AM I can stand on a stage, with a half dozen P-Teachers, present an idea, and have the audience and the teachers handle the question. We face one challenge that we are only now starting to overcome, and that until recently we needed to write P. It seems we can speak it now because we’re familiar enough with the method. So that conference, promoted, is what we will need. We need a poster with ‘all of P’ in logarithmic form. (I have it in the courseware. )
Propertarianism: Harnessing the Power of Western Civilization youtube.com Sure, I conceived of it. The lot of us completed it. But John is turning it from an intellectual to a political movement. He’s brilliant. And this one video is … this one video is … the entirety of the solution in comprehensible form. It’s the message. We have – research and development (me with others’ help) – education and training (SN folk) – marketing (john mark) – evangelism many many more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtD8sF8cKN0&
Propertarianism: Harnessing the Power of Western Civilization youtube.com Sure, I conceived of it. The lot of us completed it. But John is turning it from an intellectual to a political movement. He’s brilliant. And this one video is … this one video is … the entirety of the solution in comprehensible form. It’s the message. We have – research and development (me with others’ help) – education and training (SN folk) – marketing (john mark) – evangelism many many more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtD8sF8cKN0&
Oct 30, 2019, 3:49 PM :Solve the voting problem without the collateral damag””
—“It was universal suffrage males who gave women the vote, and in 1932, it was men who supported FDR over Hoover (who women supported more). Voting used to be granted as a reward for responsibilities, as a consequence of it. Own land, pay taxes and part of the militia who keeps the country free against enemies foreign/domestic? You get to vote because of those responsibilities. Emphasis on voting as a reward for responsibilities solves the voting problem without the collateral damage.“—Steve Pender
Oct 30, 2019, 3:49 PM :Solve the voting problem without the collateral damag””
—“It was universal suffrage males who gave women the vote, and in 1932, it was men who supported FDR over Hoover (who women supported more). Voting used to be granted as a reward for responsibilities, as a consequence of it. Own land, pay taxes and part of the militia who keeps the country free against enemies foreign/domestic? You get to vote because of those responsibilities. Emphasis on voting as a reward for responsibilities solves the voting problem without the collateral damage.“—Steve Pender
Oct 30, 2019, 4:12 PM
–I only do compatibilism, for the purpose of maximum quality of life while in pursuit of maximum eugenic evolution, with maximum speed, for the maximum achievement of mankind, in the shortest possible time, given the hostility of the planet and the universe to the development of intelligent life forms, that require long periods of stability and short periods of stress to incrementally evolve.–
(worth repeating)
Oct 30, 2019, 4:12 PM
–I only do compatibilism, for the purpose of maximum quality of life while in pursuit of maximum eugenic evolution, with maximum speed, for the maximum achievement of mankind, in the shortest possible time, given the hostility of the planet and the universe to the development of intelligent life forms, that require long periods of stability and short periods of stress to incrementally evolve.–
(worth repeating)