Oct 9, 2019, 9:01 AM Doctrinal Christianity – because faith Spiritual Christianity – because feels. Rational Christianity – because it’s good Empirical Christianity – because it seems to work Scientific Christianity – because of the five rules. There are five major branches, an thousands of sects. Mathematics is not open to interpretation. Logic isn’t open to interpretation. Physical Laws aren’t open to interpretation Propertarianism is not open to interpretation Why is it that religions claim truth if they are open to interpretation?
Form: Short Note
-
Openness To Interpretation?
Oct 9, 2019, 9:01 AM Doctrinal Christianity – because faith Spiritual Christianity – because feels. Rational Christianity – because it’s good Empirical Christianity – because it seems to work Scientific Christianity – because of the five rules. There are five major branches, an thousands of sects. Mathematics is not open to interpretation. Logic isn’t open to interpretation. Physical Laws aren’t open to interpretation Propertarianism is not open to interpretation Why is it that religions claim truth if they are open to interpretation?
-
Developing Countries.
Oct 9, 2019, 9:41 PM It sounds horrible to you but the easiest answer is to hire 10,000 American lawyers to run your courts. This is the same strategy ancient empires used by using people from remote parts of the empires to govern populations they had no knowledge of. It works perfectly in past and present. Everyone says they want good government, but they cannot have good government without good courts, and either soldiers or police who enforce the judgement of the court. The court constrains the government. Your constitutions are probably fine. Your government is probably not fine. it is a government. What makes the west successful is not our governments. IT IS OUR LAW. Law is a ‘Religion’ in for our people. Especially in America.
-
Developing Countries.
Oct 9, 2019, 9:41 PM It sounds horrible to you but the easiest answer is to hire 10,000 American lawyers to run your courts. This is the same strategy ancient empires used by using people from remote parts of the empires to govern populations they had no knowledge of. It works perfectly in past and present. Everyone says they want good government, but they cannot have good government without good courts, and either soldiers or police who enforce the judgement of the court. The court constrains the government. Your constitutions are probably fine. Your government is probably not fine. it is a government. What makes the west successful is not our governments. IT IS OUR LAW. Law is a ‘Religion’ in for our people. Especially in America.
-
Not everyone will understand the math, but many can follow the procedures, and b
Not everyone will understand the math, but many can follow the procedures, and benefit from whatever is produced by them https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/not-everyone-will-understand-the-math-but-many-can-follow-the-procedures-and-benefit-from-whatever-is-produced-by-them/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:52:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265702349428994050
-
Why the American Model “worked”
Why the American Model “worked” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/why-the-american-model-worked/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:51:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265702130888986627
-
What’s the Difference Beween Yarvin’s Nrx and Propertarianism?
What’s the Difference Beween Yarvin’s Nrx and Propertarianism? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/whats-the-difference-beween-yarvins-nrx-and-propertarianism/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:50:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265701972826603520
-
Why Is Debating Against P so Unpleasant?
Oct 11, 2019, 11:58 AM Listening to EMJ debate Dutton and Recognizing the profound difference between Argument and Error, vs Prosecution and Lying. So the reason it’s so painful for others to argue with us, is that if you use operational terms you can’t testify to something you claim you can, then you’re lying or engaging in fraud, while if you’re argument in ideal language instead of operational, you’re just making an error. This is why people hate arguing with us. That not only do we eliminate the ability to engage in sophism, but we don’t call it error, we call it lying, fraud, and deceit.
-
Why Is Debating Against P so Unpleasant?
Oct 11, 2019, 11:58 AM Listening to EMJ debate Dutton and Recognizing the profound difference between Argument and Error, vs Prosecution and Lying. So the reason it’s so painful for others to argue with us, is that if you use operational terms you can’t testify to something you claim you can, then you’re lying or engaging in fraud, while if you’re argument in ideal language instead of operational, you’re just making an error. This is why people hate arguing with us. That not only do we eliminate the ability to engage in sophism, but we don’t call it error, we call it lying, fraud, and deceit.
-
More on Guilds
Oct 12, 2019, 8:18 PM Guilds limited access, all but eliminated competition and preserved quality, which prevented optimum market pricing in exchange for optimum benefit to workers – because transport costs for goods were higher than local premium prices. So it’s more of an question of eliminating labor arbitrage. Now, other issues were important in the era because tools cost quite a bit, and it prevented the privatization of these tools. And they were also like guarantees of weights and measures in that Guild members found guilty of cheating on the public would be fined or banned from the guild. One of the policies I want to enforce is right-to-repair which will drive out the cheap goods, drive up prices and durability of goods, ending the disposable, and closing our competitive difference with japan and germany.