Marxian Economics Do Not Merit More than A Footnote https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/marxian-economics-do-not-merit-more-than-a-footnote/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 14:09:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266733377954160642
Feb 6, 2020, 1:27 PM by Daniel Gurpide The utter inanity of Marxian economics is so evident that the person who is first and foremost a revolutionary and merely seeks for a rational excuse to preach the overturn of the existing order has to look in other directions, towards other social layers to whom preach the revolutionary gospel. That’s why the New Left, Cultural Marxism and Postmodernists appeal to the outcasts of modern society, to the eternal Lumpenproletariat, the term understood not in a sociological sense.
Feb 6, 2020, 1:27 PM by Daniel Gurpide The utter inanity of Marxian economics is so evident that the person who is first and foremost a revolutionary and merely seeks for a rational excuse to preach the overturn of the existing order has to look in other directions, towards other social layers to whom preach the revolutionary gospel. That’s why the New Left, Cultural Marxism and Postmodernists appeal to the outcasts of modern society, to the eternal Lumpenproletariat, the term understood not in a sociological sense.
Feb 9, 2020, 7:21 AM
—“Focusing on the core principle of reciprocity is good, that’s a concept, that with a bit of time, most people can get their heads round. … We need to hear practical activities people can get involved in to push for this”— @relocateromania
We will roll out ‘practical activities’ once we have 1) enough of the constitution out, 2) and enough of a FAQ, and 3) a video for each market segment we’re addressing so that they know the features and benefits.Then we can start ‘organizing’: Political Party. Activists. Fighters.
Feb 9, 2020, 7:21 AM
—“Focusing on the core principle of reciprocity is good, that’s a concept, that with a bit of time, most people can get their heads round. … We need to hear practical activities people can get involved in to push for this”— @relocateromania
We will roll out ‘practical activities’ once we have 1) enough of the constitution out, 2) and enough of a FAQ, and 3) a video for each market segment we’re addressing so that they know the features and benefits.Then we can start ‘organizing’: Political Party. Activists. Fighters.
Feb 9, 2020, 7:28 AM See we all work the same way. We learn something new, we stew on it for three months, and bang, then the whole group advances in a leap. I can observe it’s happened. I can’ observe it in myself. I can’t tell when I’ve made a leap. But between leaps I can’t predict the leap.
Feb 9, 2020, 7:28 AM See we all work the same way. We learn something new, we stew on it for three months, and bang, then the whole group advances in a leap. I can observe it’s happened. I can’ observe it in myself. I can’t tell when I’ve made a leap. But between leaps I can’t predict the leap.
Feb 9, 2020, 7:38 AM We don’t ask people to do anything. They do them of their own volition. John, Bill, Eli, Brandon, Martin, Alain, Pomen, and the fifty other guys I could mention – we just let the market do its job. And we even spin off people. People take P and use it for their own purposes. And that’s what we want them to do. P creates a big tent on the methodology, but it creates a lot of tribes for the application of it to different political, economic, philosophical, and spiritual frames. Sure, I have a solution for constitutional reformation to continue the western tradition and to follow the hindus and the chinese into insulation from the semitic and african civilizations so that we can each develop our civilizations according to our needs. But you can build any form of political or economic order under P and under rule of law with P – you just have to do it truthfully and reciprocally. So when we say “markets in everything” we mean EVERYTHING.
Feb 9, 2020, 7:38 AM We don’t ask people to do anything. They do them of their own volition. John, Bill, Eli, Brandon, Martin, Alain, Pomen, and the fifty other guys I could mention – we just let the market do its job. And we even spin off people. People take P and use it for their own purposes. And that’s what we want them to do. P creates a big tent on the methodology, but it creates a lot of tribes for the application of it to different political, economic, philosophical, and spiritual frames. Sure, I have a solution for constitutional reformation to continue the western tradition and to follow the hindus and the chinese into insulation from the semitic and african civilizations so that we can each develop our civilizations according to our needs. But you can build any form of political or economic order under P and under rule of law with P – you just have to do it truthfully and reciprocally. So when we say “markets in everything” we mean EVERYTHING.
Feb 9, 2020, 7:48 AM by Luke Weinhagen The prioritization of trust over performance. Both are important, but their prioritization under normal conditions should always favor trust. This same graph is what I am aiming at when I say things like “kinship capitalism”. Enough performance for the in-group capitalism to function well but never at the cost of trust and never allowing incentives for higher performance to be subsidized by the expenditure of trust.