Twice.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-20 18:34:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1924896524099899420
Twice.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-20 18:34:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1924896524099899420
Because of population distribution like Canada. And because they can’t afford roads. It’s a very poor country where something like a third of homes still use outhouses.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-19 22:51:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1924598902625599849
Love you man. Thank you for your good works for the benefit of all of us. 😉 privileged to share your company and great conversation. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-19 21:56:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1924585037707804994
No evidence to support that claim.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-18 05:32:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923975047435387301
This is extraordinarily awesome. I’m on the road but will give it time when done. Amazing work noah.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-17 21:59:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923860873640280152
Wow….
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-17 19:45:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923827332999217196
I”m with you brother. I find it depressing because I very much enjoyed the dance between the sexes under traditional roles, and I was happy to hold women on a pedestal. But what has happened in a short time is that we have restore the ancient and universal perception of women as selfish, experience-gluttony, gold digging wh–res, and that Pandora is the very lesson that we should take when we consider women without domestication against her hyperconsumption especially of attention. Attention whoring is perhaps the worst trait that allows the expression of the worst in female behavior. And the west along shows of our women as a point of pride only exacerbating the issue.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-17 19:02:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923816463665922530
I think that I am nearly always misunderstood when I discuss this, as the difference between the grammar (means of conveying the logic) the content of it, and the derrogatory affects on the aristocracy that is where all the ‘good’ in the west came from. The fact that christianity, despite all its harms, made possible the unificadtion of the aristocracy, peasants women, and slaves, by making them capable of virtue without possessing the same abilities as the aristocracy. In other words chrsitanity gave teh bottom a means of virtue in a civilization where virtue was limited to aristoxratic traits. The fact that most of christianity is actually plato, and is a counter-revolution against greek and roman law, is probably lost on everyone but the few who study such things. THe truth is the truth. Christianity was originally conveyed and still is by feminine submission, sophistry, and supernatural nonsense does not necessarily detract that a christian with an 80IQ is still a good person, and that cannot be said of the same IQ under any other religion.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-17 18:58:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923815467032146258
Great question William:
Here is the correct answer straight out of our AI. You can access the AI at:
https://
chatgpt.com/g/g-682681bf9f
54819180437bac589ed838-curt-doolittle-s-natural-law
…. .
Yes, the Natural Law Institute (NLI) under Curt Doolittle explicitly defines “parasite” and “parasitism” in operational legal and moral terms.
According to Volume IV of The Natural Law, parasitism is any imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others without reciprocal compensation. More precisely:
“All attempts to circumvent reciprocity constitute an attempt at free riding, parasitism, or predation – whether by accident, error, bias, or intent – are irreciprocal, and criminal, unethical, immoral, or evil.”
This definition is grounded in the Natural Law of Reciprocity: one must not, by display, word, or deed, impose or allow the imposition of costs on others’ demonstrated interests unless it is part of a productive, fully informed, warrantied, and voluntary exchange.
In economic and legal dimensions, Doolittle extends this to any form of rent-seeking, free-riding, or fraud—actions that generate gains for one party at unconsented cost to others. This includes both direct harm (e.g., theft) and indirect externalities (e.g., misinformation, fraud, or legal imposition without due diligence or consent).
Thus, in NLI’s legal philosophy, “parasite” is not a rhetorical insult but a strictly defined class of irreciprocal behavior testable under the logic of sovereignty, reciprocity, and demonstrated interest.
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-17 18:53:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923814046387913060
Well done. Though the presumption that the polity would survive long enough for such emergence is more than questionable and you might need to discuss that potential and its consequences as well, and provide insight into what determines each outcome. But again well done even if optimistic. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-17 09:20:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923670029482270939