(excellent)
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-23 17:17:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937198341764579602
Form: Reply
-
Correct. 😉
Correct. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-22 00:25:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1936581290050154930
-
An accusation without explanation. How is it a naturalistic fallacy? It’s simply
An accusation without explanation. How is it a naturalistic fallacy? It’s simply observed human behavior and explanation of that behavior as an optimum means of non-provocation of retaliation and thus cooperation which produces discounts on everything for everyone. What is the counter argument?
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-21 17:26:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1936475926830989635
-
Its not a rejection. Think it through
Its not a rejection. Think it through.
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-21 01:08:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1936229728161349940
-
@Jayman471 Thanks again for all you do
@Jayman471
Thanks again for all you do.
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-20 02:39:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1935890257352015974
-
Humorous. How could the sophistication of what I said be stated more concisely a
Humorous. How could the sophistication of what I said be stated more concisely and economically? 😉
Always humorous to have someone question my IQ. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-20 02:11:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1935883128801054801
-
My goodness, your eloquence is truly a gift to discourse—did you borrow that arg
My goodness, your eloquence is truly a gift to discourse—did you borrow that argument from a bumper sticker or come up with it all by yourself?
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-20 01:48:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1935877471951634448
-
If you had an argument you would make one. It’s extremely unlikely that you have
If you had an argument you would make one. It’s extremely unlikely that you have even the minimum knowledge to discuss these subjects with me. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-20 01:43:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1935876016733667725
-
I find every single ‘I don’t get it’ comment humorous. 😉 We all write for audie
I find every single ‘I don’t get it’ comment humorous. 😉
We all write for audiences. All scientific disciplines use domain specific terminology. I am no different.
I write for my audience like all others do. 😉
In other words “just because calculus is hard and you don’t
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-20 01:36:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1935874263963324779
-
Law, ethics, and morality are ‘bad enough’ so to speak when it comes to telling
Law, ethics, and morality are ‘bad enough’ so to speak when it comes to telling you harsh truths about reality. Moritz is expressing our concern that we know how to deliver the information in a friendly fashion. Becuase, in fact, there are better and worse personality trait distributions, and better and worse ethical and moral distributions in different classes and regions.
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-19 18:15:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1935763342972666154