(Thank you. Love you man.)
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 17:23:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942998022864146503
Form: Reply
-
At least for me, it is the only ‘release’ that works, mostly because y’all suppo
At least for me, it is the only ‘release’ that works, mostly because y’all support me so consistently. 😉 -hugs
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 17:11:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942995043092172886
-
Dunno. You want to meet up in person and do something about it?
Dunno. You want to meet up in person and do something about it?
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 02:36:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942774818799239592
-
Response to Accusation of Anti-Semitism Response to Accusation of Anti-Semitism
Response to Accusation of Anti-Semitism
Response to Accusation of Anti-SemitismThe claim is false. I criticize Abrahamism—not Jews. The difference is categorical.Anti-Semitism is racial or ethnic animus.Anti-Abrahamism is a critique of a sequence of moral grammars (Judaism → Christianity → Islam → Marxism → Postmodernism → Wokeism) that replace reciprocity with deceit, emotional coercion, and universalist false promises.
Abrahamic systems disable falsification, prohibit retaliation, and reward parasitism—subverting the necessary law of reciprocity that makes civilization possible.This critique is not ethnic. It is legal, operational, and moral:
– I demand truth
– I demand reciprocity
– I demand decidabilityIf you’re going to accuse me, then satisfy the test of testimonial truth: define your terms, operationalize harm, demonstrate asymmetry. Otherwise, you’re just retaliating emotionally against uncomfortable facts.This isn’t hate. This is law.
—Truth is enough.MORE….To respond effectively and truthfully to an accusation of anti-Semitism when the actual critique is anti-Abrahamism, you must:
1. Define the Distinction OperationallyAnti-Semitism refers to hatred or discrimination against people of Jewish descent, typically based on ethnicity or religion. It is an ethnocentric claim.Anti-Abrahamism, by contrast, is a critique of group evolutionary strategy and grammar—specifically the feminine, deceit-tolerant, conflationary, and non-reciprocal speech grammars evolved in the Semitic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) and extended through Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.2. Frame the Critique Within the Law of ReciprocityThe critique of Abrahamic moral systems is rooted in their violation of reciprocity in public speech, law, and institutional organization:-
They make false promises of equality, liberation, or utopia that externalize costs onto others.
-
They prohibit retaliation, undermining the evolutionary necessity of reciprocity.
-
They use pilpul and critique (GSRRM) as methods of evading falsification and accountability.
Thus, the critique is legal, operational, and reciprocity-enforcing, not racial or ethnic.3. Demand Reciprocity in ReturnThis adversarial framing forces the accuser to operationalize their claim, which they almost always cannot do without collapsing into moral projection or status-seeking.4. Reframe the Discussion as a Conflict of Moral OrdersThe Natural Law project is a European strategy of truth-telling, sovereignty, and reciprocity. Abrahamism is a Semitic strategy of obedience, deception, and submission to universal authority—whether that be Yahweh, Marx, or Progress.The claim is not who is right by preference, but which system produces decidability, reciprocity, and prosperity under evolutionary constraint.5. Close with the Moral License
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-08 22:26:54 UTC
Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1942712022736724475
-
-
JL: that one argument is enough to end the ambition
JL: that one argument is enough to end the ambition.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-06 21:44:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1941976518349193625
-
Unlikely. If misguided they are not ignorant. The present young are less misguid
Unlikely. If misguided they are not ignorant. The present young are less misguided but abysmally ignorant and fragile.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-06 21:30:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1941973052310598097
-
N: The world is a better wiser place with you in it. Thank you for all you do
N: The world is a better wiser place with you in it. Thank you for all you do.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-06 21:28:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1941972540823675032
-
Go to my profile -> media tab and scroll thu it and you’ll find a lot to work wi
Go to my profile -> media tab and scroll thu it and you’ll find a lot to work with.
This is the original starting position.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-06 18:00:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1941920137243930873
-
Yes this is one of nearly 100 charts produced by expanding on our original work
Yes this is one of nearly 100 charts produced by expanding on our original work by someone who asked to remain anonymous. Additionally, Shane (PhD) has produced hundreds more that illustrate these ideas down to neurochemistry.
This particular diagram required a bit of subjectivity in the placement of examples but my interpretation is that its still correct.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-06 17:46:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1941916784606777504
-
Noah. Same here
Noah. Same here.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-06 01:28:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1941670681294536810
