Form: Reply

–Martin Stepan is brilliant. He’s just the not-so-nice version. 😉 Which should tell you something. Meaning, that if I’m saying something I acknowledge is an unpleasant truth, and I’m trying to find a workaround that produces the incentives that will correct the problem we seek to avoid by speaking of that unpleasant truth, then perhaps others should take into account there are others less diligent and more practical in their suppression of the irreciprocities made possible by exploitation of the holes in our laws and our customs – those high trust customs we so rely upon for our extraordinary contition compared to other peoples. Because if men such as I fail, it will be that those men such as I am not, will instead, choose more urgent, thorough, certain, and practical solutions to the crimes of modernity let loose by the introduction of the feminine without equal suppression of that most evil of intuitions of the feminine soul – which is to evade all responsibility possible, from self regulation to capital to the commons to the genome.