Same. Agreed. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 01:17:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746703099295580295
Reply addressees: @ch35614 @SwornInvictus @ReacNat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746656943320821784
Form: Reply
-
Love you man. 😉
Love you man. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 01:15:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746702701692375479
Reply addressees: @LukeWeinhagen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746698139174580720
-
They thought. You thought. We know. That’s the difference. 😉
They thought. You thought. We know. That’s the difference. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 01:14:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746702359919563251
Reply addressees: @GPEditor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745889065419911569
-
(zach: smart. yes.)
(zach: smart. yes.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 00:25:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746690060504744062
Reply addressees: @Zamicol @MindEnjoyer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746626009300889879
-
) Making sen;)se turns out to be relatively uncommon these days. I try to make i
😉 Making sen;)se turns out to be relatively uncommon these days. I try to make it happen at least once in a while. 😉
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-14 19:31:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746616125159256084
Reply addressees: @hawkevick @neoamericana
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746611134512160920
-
You cruel cruel man you… 😉
You cruel cruel man you… 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-14 19:04:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746609286145319195
Reply addressees: @neoamericana @hawkevick
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746609159116636350
-
Maybe y’all don’t undersetand but the greeks (eastern roman empmire) imposed chr
Maybe y’all don’t undersetand but the greeks (eastern roman empmire) imposed christianity by force on the west so that it could destroy teh remaining aristocracy, destroy the remaining agovernment, and bring it under eastern rule. Can’t happen though because germanics are not…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-14 19:03:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746609120986165461
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746608589634990568
-
There was nothing roman in byzantium, and nothing byzantine after the muslim (tu
There was nothing roman in byzantium, and nothing byzantine after the muslim (turkish) conquest of anatolia.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-14 19:02:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746608797676683660
Reply addressees: @neoamericana @hawkevick
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746608589634990568
-
the catholic lens at least after aquinas is simply the restatedment of church do
the catholic lens at least after aquinas is simply the restatedment of church dogma as natural law of cooperation. The natural law of coooperation turns out to be the science of cooperation. And chrsitinity turns out to be the optimum training for participation in a high trust society under the natural law. The only difference being that the catholic states were more corrupt (southern) because they were older institutions, where the norhtern states were both less corrupt and less tolerant of corruption because the state in the holy roman empire was more competent and pragmaticc and secular. So, the prostestant reformation was a rebellion against church lying and corruption just as the present rebellion against the marxist-to-woke academy-state-media complex is a rebellion against lying and corruption,
Reply addressees: @Dang57404287
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-14 19:01:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746608572278992896
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746606018719523008
-
Not all good things at all. It destroyed the ethics necessary for the political
Not all good things at all. It destroyed the ethics necessary for the political participation in norms, traditions, economiies, politics and war, and produced an alternative political order the consequences of which were a dark age. The fundamental problem was that aristocratic religions and p hilosophy were too challenging for women the lower clases and slaves and so christianity provided a religion for the underclasses and was as destructive in the ancient world as marxism-to-woke is in th emodern. Marxism to woke is just a psudoscientific reformation of the false promises of the supernatural cults. Same false promies. Same lies. Same methods. Just promise of an afterlife vs promise after whiteness, where whiteness means aristocracy and aristocracy means responsibilty and competency.
Reply addressees: @libertreee
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-14 18:58:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746607619077283840
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746555378152976713