Form: Reply

  • I don’t understand … I’m not making a case for biology but for behavior. And a

    I don’t understand … I’m not making a case for biology but for behavior. And as for biology most of the upper classes are rotations up and down out of the middle that tends to be the genetic reserve less burdened by genetic load.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 01:17:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748152672375447794

    Reply addressees: @cryptodiaries

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748090356615315491

  • Quite a sophisticated logic right there. Nice

    Quite a sophisticated logic right there. Nice.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 01:15:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748152224931324132

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748127970018078935

  • MATT: FALSE “The monarchy is above the law in the restoration of the law” This a

    MATT: FALSE
    “The monarchy is above the law in the restoration of the law”

    This applies to the president. It’s a purely via negativa license.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 01:11:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748151155744477344

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748062555992420708

  • Matthew Office work vs Physical work. That’s the only difference. And for many p

    Matthew
    Office work vs Physical work. That’s the only difference. And for many people that’s enough.

    Unfortunately.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 01:09:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748150683507826814

    Reply addressees: @matthewdmarsden

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747819257239408652

  • MATT: FALSE the president is always adjudicable by the congress – it’s called im

    MATT: FALSE
    the president is always adjudicable by the congress – it’s called impeachment.
    We have never prosecuted presidents for actions in their time in office, and your failure to grasp that is almost incomprehensible to any student of our government and it’s premises.
    So Trump is correct. You cannot contrive a court against an ex president. the consequences would be catastrophically limiting to any president.

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 01:08:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748150465068417024

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747954353992769775

  • @WerrellBradley Interesting. It has taken Brad almost three years, starting with

    @WerrellBradley
    Interesting. It has taken Brad almost three years, starting with reading one of my 400 page drafts to the point where today he writes proofs in algorithmic sequence in operational prose using vocabulary consisting of measurements. I’d be proud of writing his recent pieces myself. They’re excellent.

    Now of course, brad is from the upper classes, from academic parentage, has an advanced degree, is extremely well read. So I can’t really say ‘if he can do it so can you’ with any seriousness. 😉 But if you look at any number of our better people who I will not name, but are not part of the organization directly, they can do it too. So can you. It’s just a heck of a lot of work retraining your brain to ‘science it’ so to speak. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 23:53:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748131499293978624

  • Have I told you that you’re awesome lately? Seriously. Sometimes I think you’re

    Have I told you that you’re awesome lately? Seriously. Sometimes I think you’re the only sane person on the right. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 23:46:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748129719344586776

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748124388267119054

  • “Curt, please explain “animal rights” in your system.”— Great Question. My sys

    —“Curt, please explain “animal rights” in your system.”—

    Great Question. My system is just science. But that’s ok. 😉

    It is not a necessity, it’s a utility, and as a utility, it’s a political choice. So let’s explain why we should protect animals (and nature for that matter), and I bet I’ll do a better job than most. 😉

    1) Technically speaking, an animal can’t have a right because no right can exist that can’t be reciprocated.

    2) However, like children, the infirmed, and the disabled, who cannot engage in the exchange of reciprocal rights obligations and inalienations, we can agree among ourselves to grant them protections rather than rights – where the protection is equal in practice to the right, but unlike rights, the protection must be exercised by someone or some group on their behalf – as they lack the capacity.

    3) However, this does not settle the problem of a difference between our opinions of what those protections consist of. The prohibition on cruelty is rather obvious to all. The use of animals as a resource is not so obvious to all, despite that

    4) The logic of these protections is not sophisticated.
    (a) preserve an asset or rather an ecology of assets that are a resource for humans emotionally, psychologically, socially, politically, and economically as well.
    (b) continue the slow development and reinforcement of the value of life, and the prohibition on aggression, harm, and suffering worldwide.
    (c) prevent the expression and habituation of behaviors by humans against animals that might be eventually extended to humans – which only serves to amplify (b).
    (d) filter people who we do not wish among us – which I might add as a personal note, is excessive.
    (e) at the cost of having to care for and protect such animals.

    Note that I did not mention the feminine tendency to misapply empathy that evolution provided her for the care of her offspring, the offspring of the extended family, clan and tribe, other women, and men under duress.

    One of the problems we face in the present era is that puberty extends the nervous system of the female such that it can keep track of the states of her offspring. Yet, without those offspring women then misuse that empathy as well as drama creation, emotional manipulation, the hyperconsumption and hypergamy, virtue signalling, gossiping, shaming, rallying undermining and canceling because like male dominance expression in competition for status, females can not resist exercising those impulsive emotional stimulations either.

    In fact, the above problems of women in unregulated schooling, with limited parenting, exposed to the virtue signal warfare of social media, absent responsibilities of the workplace, absent responsibility for siblings, absent regular hormonal cycles because of the pill, absent responsibility for compromise with a mate, and most importantly absence of responsibility for offspring, and the offspring of other women, are in no small part if not the most part, the primary cause of political conflict and the collapse of education, society, morals, traditions, institutions, and even our laws.

    Men have had fifty thousand years to develop means of limiting each other’s behavior – and it most of it occurred in the past ten thousand. Women have only had a century, and unfortunately self regulation is much harder for women than men – so women require other women to socially limit them which is why women excel at social construction of behavior. … Because women need it from each other. Just a do children need it from mothers.

    So, to answer the question of animal rights I must answer the entire scope of causality that brings up the question and in doing so I create the potential for offense, but offense that if felt is then a necessity to feel and adapt to.

    Animals can be given protections that are the equivalent of rights but they cannot have rights because it is impossible for them to exchange that right, and rights can only exist if they are mirrored by an obligation where both right and obligation are inalienable.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @Saurabh_Shah1


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 23:45:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748129544341426178

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748102884309508483

  • “A large percent, and perhaps most, of left, center, and right, simply don’t des

    “A large percent, and perhaps most, of left, center, and right, simply don’t deserve saving from themselves, independent of whether they can be saved from each other, or the pseudo elites both foreign and domestic, who set them against one another to gain power over them, with the false promise of better results than we demonstrated before they divided our people with those false promises.”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 23:20:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748123238859702272

  • RT @WerrellBradley: THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE PURITY SPIRAL Human beings seek to im

    RT @WerrellBradley: THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE PURITY SPIRAL

    Human beings seek to improve their Social Status, which represents the Discount o…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 22:56:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748117276396601594