Yes of course.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 06:27:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752579314262905132
Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752567504457846929
Yes of course.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 06:27:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752579314262905132
Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752567504457846929
That is a good reason to have faith.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 03:41:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752537580107677780
Reply addressees: @shade_forrest @KenCavallon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752536368436158615
RT @AutistocratMS: This is inspiring, seeing both that it’s still possible and that our work is already making a difference, if not yet pol…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 02:02:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752512594051490200
Yes.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 01:34:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752505661877899443
Reply addressees: @BobbyBrisket
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752505507863019861
RT @SRCHicks: True?
“What pushes the masses into the camp of socialism is, even more than the illusion that socialism will make them richer…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 01:12:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752500038238966125
(Thank you. Love you man.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 01:10:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752499656179720432
Reply addressees: @TysonBay @realJohnVictor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752496079868952991
RT @shade_forrest: One of my favorite pieces of writing from Curt. I’ve shared it often and I expect I’ll often continue to do so.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 01:10:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752499561002680637
(Martin is one of the smartest people that would ever take the time to even speak to you. )
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 00:16:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752486015422378281
Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752485363984048260
*(It’s the opposite. guarantee financial insecurity if they don’t have replacement children – because that’s what they’re doing to everyone else by their selfishness. Men fight in war, take the dangerous jobs, bear more risk, push less costs onto society, absorb more cellular damage, specialize more but adapt to groups less, and die earlier. And what do women without children do except indulge in self gratification? 😉 Attention seeking? Attention getting? After all, why do women want attention other than that evolution provided the incentive to maintain control over children (and other women, and especially men).)
Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 00:15:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752485811860226048
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752483956136538410
(AFAIK, relative equality is irreversible, but the vast redistribution from men to women will have to end. It was bad enough when we went from one propertied family with one vote, to one family regardless of responsibility one vote, to one person one vote. So I suspect continued collapse of marriage, economic democracy, and separate houses for men and women. That said, what I really expect is to see the conservative women continue to repproduce and the progressive (selfish) women continue not to, and the legislation will level out, because that reproductive shift is already happening. But this current circumstance can’t survive for long. The damage to society, poltics, economics, and long term redistribution is irreversible.
Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 00:06:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752483499804700672
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752481828785496270