Form: Reply

@dr_duchesne
: I’ve done a great deal of work on european (masculine systemic) thinking vs semitic (feminine verbal) thinking across the full suit of sciences. (I study logic, grammars, methods of argument, and sex differences in cognition, communication and particularly sex differences in deceit. The consistency of these differences is astonishing)

What’s interesting to note is that unlike maxwell and say hilbert, einstein and bohr both converted from the materialist and systematic paradigm to the imaginary and verbal paradigm. Einstein with space-time and his pictures-as-analogies, Cantor with Infinities, and Bohr with “just calculate” in the Copenhagen consensus. In other words, hilbert stopped when einstein published (to beat hilbert to it), but hilbert was trying to find the correct material systemic solution not an analogy or derivation as einstein did. So we ended up with a rapid advancement at the time, but stalled by the 70s as the limits of the verbal-pictoral solution of einstein were reached, and the generations of physicists were misdirected into mathiness. (which is why we’ve lost 50+ years in fundamental physics).

I know this might seem as a leap to the audience but it won’t to Dr. RD: The european evolved testimony, rational philosophy, and geometry, and the semite evolved storytellilng, mythicism, and algebra. The difference between those is realism (measurement) vs idealism (description).

My point being that the masculine feminine genetic distribution in our populations is manifest in the material testifiable vs verbal imaginable differences in our civilizational work product (all wisdom literatures) preserves the sex differences in cognition. Something we still see in IQ tests and college entry tests and even awarded degrees, and very obviously in public intellectuals and mass producers of pseudoscience and propaganda. And even within those rewarded degrees we see the difference in the distribution.

I keep a table of these characters and it’s fascinating.