(Smart.) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 19:47:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769450534824472751
Reply addressees: @LudwigNverMises @BasedErwin @RunicSigil
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769447034656874528
(Smart.) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 19:47:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769450534824472751
Reply addressees: @LudwigNverMises @BasedErwin @RunicSigil
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769447034656874528
Thanks for the intellectually honest and intelligent question. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 19:28:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769445799078055945
Reply addressees: @BasedErwin @RunicSigil
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769445462686171352
—“Q:What about brain computer interfaces?”—
As we have seen with previous attempts as well as the findings from neuralink, the motor cortex is the only region of the brain where signals are discrete enough to input and output from the brain. However, that does not mean that we cannot continue the long march of providing the brain with increasingly scale, time, and volume information reduced to analogy of experience that is testable by the existing brain, AND that the brain will adapt to that availability of information just as we have to language, writing, mathematics, movies, and digital information streams.
Reply addressees: @BasedErwin @RunicSigil
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 18:36:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769432528597782529
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769426947845841248
That’s a False Criticism: the argument is that the DISTRIBUTION of CLASS SIZES differs between the races. This absolutely positively unquestionably true. And trying to personalize the truth as an attack on Musk is just intellectually dishonest.
And will stansil is the most absurd left wing propagandist.
You interviewed young people who are on the extreme edge of leftist thought. And not those who have careers that specialize in differences.
In fact even someone as dedicated to NOT advancing racism as Dr Reich, who runs the best genetic research firm in the world, has cautioned that we must come to terms with rather large differences in the genetic expression of racial groups.
The largest differences are:
(a) Evolutionary neoteny and it’s consequences
(b) The impact of neotenic differences in evolution on our self regulation and intelligence.
Every counter argument is a lie.
Quite by accident, I specialize in sex and group differences in lying.
As far as I know I’m the leading researcher in the world on this subject.
And the author of the above video, and Will Stancil, and the marginal researcher from Harvard are all engaging in lying. Where lying means they are seeking to justify a falsehood and a prior rather than disambiguate and testify to the evidence as it exists.
We solved IQ before 2000. We solved sex differences by 2012. We solve race differences by 2018. These differences are easily understood. Their cause is easily understood.
One would need a superior theory in order to compete with the rather obvious data.
We are very clear that the postwar pseudoscientific attempt to falsify darwinian evolution natural selection and group differences caused by geographic isolation and speciation and hybridization as humans spread across the continents has been as intentional a pseudoscientific pursuit as was marxist economics and postmodern literature.
The game is up.
We must learn to govern despite our differences rather than the pretenses that we have none.
Reply addressees: @JoshLekach
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 18:32:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769431605532037122
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769378838675329510
I mentioned those technologies because they are all currently in some state of development, with, I think, next month being the first large scale neuromorphic computer coming online, I think in Australia? (pretty sure). Photonic chips, and three dimensional chips are all in progress. IMO we will see the boom in existing vector compute chips last for a bit and then a crash as those chips are replaced by the neuromorphic. But as in all things I have a very good record of WHAT will happen but timing such things is a fool’s game. 😉
Reply addressees: @RunicSigil
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 17:32:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769416640595152896
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769415591587442890
—“Q: What about mentats instead of chips?”–
Not possible.
The rate of input of information available to human brains, and the rate of integration into memory, and the breadth of paradigms in which information is structured, the precision of that information, synthesis of that information, and the volume of information in and across those paradigms exceeds by orders of magnitude the capacity of the human brain.
If you learn my (our) work on the unification of the fields and universal commensurability you can significantly improve the disambiguation, organization, synthesis and falsification of the available information. You’ll gain at least a standard deviation in demonstrated intelligence with the same IQ.
But assuming we either solve the algorithmic problem of the current models and their underlying hardware architecture, or we manage to build large numbers of neuromorphic computers, in three dimensional chips instead of two, and then using photons (light) solving the heat problem, then the necessity of pre-calculation, vast compute, and delayed integration of information, will be circumvented, and at that point leaving human capacity in the dust even more so than now.
Reply addressees: @RunicSigil
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 17:09:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769410650399264768
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769395685739405761
That’s unlikely.
See ‘Mirror’.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 10:16:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769306912389050819
Reply addressees: @Clyatt__ @philosophytweet
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769264193318887506
Looks like via third party app.
Sigh. You can’t trust anybody … lol
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 10:16:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769306784651526227
Reply addressees: @FatherIsTalking
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769277175013007763
Hacked. 🙁
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 09:57:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769302104777036178
Reply addressees: @FatherIsTalking
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769277175013007763
RL: Hmmm…. There is a chance you will ‘give up’ and plateau if you cannot maintain the pursuit of truth regardless of consequence, from which, you then attempt to determine the possible goods. Every single philosopher who failed sought the good instead of the true. Every attempt resulted in a fantasy moral literature that was but a failed attempt to bridge religion and science for those that entertain themselves with ideas no more meaningful or important than those of fiction and myth.
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-17 04:53:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769225402113826816
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769066707094470741