Yes. Not sure how much of that’s a quote or your own words but it’s spot on. π Well done.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-06 19:37:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1975284268600545671
Yes. Not sure how much of that’s a quote or your own words but it’s spot on. π Well done.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-06 19:37:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1975284268600545671
I’m simply acknowledging the evolution of polities and cultures in truth, responsibility, and agency. The high point of western civilization was either england pre-war or the USA, with germany cut off from achieving her potential. And I acknowledge the far greater challenge of that evolution on the continent vs on the seas. We know the rate at which these capacities spread. From west to east. Just as we know how the steppe influence spread from east to west.
Not sure what ‘being a man’ means in your statement. And it could be that I take the scope of responsibility and agency as the measure. But even if I do, that’s probably correct.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-06 19:36:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1975283946415145380
You’ve made another leap in your ability. Well done. And the more patterns you see, the more you can see… Color me joyous. What you’re doing isn’t easy. But you’re doing it. π
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-06 16:13:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1975233072720466074
True. Though our strategy since our formation out of Hoppe’s PFS in 2012 requires I solve the problem with my peers in the opposition, and that “understanding rolls downhill” by the efforts of those most capable of reaching their peers. The reason being I do not believe and my team does not believe I can do so. :/
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-06 02:02:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1975018757161631961
lol.. That’s the spirit! π
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-05 03:20:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1974676124627349751
Yes. Elon is correct. I can’t make the argument at the moment because I’m down with a bad cold, but he is correct – even though the court has previously erred, as we can see in the campaign funding debate. That said, argument may be free speech (masculine ), but entertainment functions not by argument but by suggestion and manipulation (feminine) – not argument. And as I have written extensively, we are lagging suppression of fraud by indirection and suggestion in law and legislation – which is the means by which the lawfare against our rule of law, education, and public speech has undermined our traditional demand for testimonial truth in matters public.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-05 01:37:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1974650162690888129
I use both for obvious reasons. I research with regular chatgpt 5 thinking, and I test with Runcible on 4 and 5.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-03 23:02:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1974248840254406855
Hmm. All true but not much help. Almost always better to manually pull correct insights into a new chat, say βgiven the following: β¦ β and steer it if needed.
My work is complicated, and I use a number of techniques to narrow the search space. And this is the only solution I have found that works.
Programmatically itβs best to treat chats as episodic memory and isolate contexts until merging them again is necessary.
Iβve written about this technique as evidence of the consequence of the lack of episodic memory.
We should have a session chat to track topics and sub session chats by topic.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-03 22:37:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1974242347870503186
Nathan’s a twit, enraptured by his projections. But I don’t understand the desire to suppress him. Understanding of falsehood and error bias and deceit requires the presence of falsehood and error bias and deceit. Else the population loses sensitivity to the crime. This is most evident in the west where truth before face and high trust were so successful that immigration of low trust peoples from face-before truth, or faceless cultures have been able to cause profound damage.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-03 19:58:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1974202330850746401
Well, the disambiguation is in whether one can control what one is ‘unwanted’ or ‘derided’ for. If it’s individual or group behavior then that’s one thing. If it’s not behavioral, that’s another. At least that’s the argument. π
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-03 19:09:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1974189967288209444