Curt Doolittle

Form: Reply

  • How Would You Respond In This Version Of The “ultimate Game,” A Famous Economic Experiment?

    Half.

    The problem with this particular ‘dilemma’ is that the amount is enough to split.

    RESPONSE
    The question is unclear that the beneficial idea would somehow be hidden. For those of us who work in this field, we know that it is impossible to promote than intentionally hide such an idea.

    Like most moral dilemma questions, the structure of the question is the problem, not human morality.  There are no moral dilemmas.

    https://www.quora.com/How-would-you-respond-in-this-version-of-the-Ultimate-Game-a-famous-economic-experiment

  • How Would You Respond In This Version Of The “ultimate Game,” A Famous Economic Experiment?

    Half.

    The problem with this particular ‘dilemma’ is that the amount is enough to split.

    RESPONSE
    The question is unclear that the beneficial idea would somehow be hidden. For those of us who work in this field, we know that it is impossible to promote than intentionally hide such an idea.

    Like most moral dilemma questions, the structure of the question is the problem, not human morality.  There are no moral dilemmas.

    https://www.quora.com/How-would-you-respond-in-this-version-of-the-Ultimate-Game-a-famous-economic-experiment

  • I have no particular claim to wisdom. I just work hard. 😉

    : I have no particular claim to wisdom. I just work hard. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 21:08:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/461613208089141250

    Reply addressees: @JeffSovereign

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/444664267413782528

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DigitalRoamad

    @curt_doolittle enlighten me with ur wisdom…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/444664267413782528

  • MY MANY TERMINOLOGY CRITICS 🙂 I don’t like to just ‘point’ to my glossary entri

    http://www.propertarianism.com/glossary/TO MY MANY TERMINOLOGY CRITICS 🙂

    I don’t like to just ‘point’ to my glossary entries every time I use some term. I’d rather defend each term in context – it’s like physical fitness. I get better at my arguments with every ‘set of reps’.

    In a perfect world, every time a use a term, FB would link to it in my glossary. (Even on my web site I have to do it manually).

    But my Glossary is 50K words of definitions. I started it in 2009. I don’t really have to add to it all that often any longer.

    I periodically take a given letter (A-Z) and update it. But you know, it’s turned out to be pretty stable.

    Some terms are marked “undone” so that I go back and finish them. Some could use some clarification.

    My original intention was to emphasize those terms that I have modified or which I’ve created. But many many terms have been modified to abandon enlightenment errors and introduce propertarian corrections to those terms.

    http://www.propertarianism.com/glossary/

    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-23 06:38:00 UTC

  • (“Aristocratic Egalitarian Libertarianism?” I think that’s redundant. And why ca

    (“Aristocratic Egalitarian Libertarianism?” I think that’s redundant. And why carry the baggage of Rothbardianism?)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-13 00:05:00 UTC

  • Thank you for being you, Alex. 🙂

    Thank you for being you, Alex. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2014-04-02 06:38:00 UTC

  • I think you understand the Putin strategy, although you do not seem to have adde

    http://buchanan.org/blog/putin-irrational-one-6292Pat,

    I think you understand the Putin strategy, although you do not seem to have added the obvious problem that Russia has enormous borders and a thin population – which has historically been accosted from all sides. Their only defense is a strong offense.

    Second, if Putin is in fact, an ethno-nationalist, (I agree that he is) then he should just say so. Because a lot of the west would support him in that position for, as you mentioned, the same reasons we support the jews. Conservative support would be overwhelming.

    Third, but the problem he has in convincingly making that argument, is that his government is profoundly corrupt, extractive and predatory on its own people. By contrast, it’s very obvious that membership in the EU is life-alteringly superior for eastern Europe – at high cost to western europeans.

    Fourth, Russia has nothing to offer the world or its orbit other than oil and gas. Russian occupation is a net negative for any economy that it influences. (See the Economists’ report.)

    Fifth, all he had to do was offer all Russian-Crimeans dual citizenship, and then ask for a referendum – one which everyone would support. It was completely unnecessary to use military occupation with a foregone conclusion.

    Russia must reform it’s systemic and pervasive corruption. It is too heavy a burden on the people for the people to compete on the world market. Without reforming corruption, Russia is just a rogue and predatory militaristic state with nothing to offer the world.

    An ethno-nationalist Russia that suppresses corruption offers something wonderful to the world. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2014-03-19 11:24:00 UTC

  • great story

    great story

    Source date (UTC): 2014-03-16 23:20:00 UTC

  • You aren’t confused. Just not very bright

    You aren’t confused. Just not very bright.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-03-15 02:20:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/444659407633522688

    Reply addressees: @JeffSovereign

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/444656456445345792

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DigitalRoamad

    I’m confused: If #Ukraine overthrow was legal, why does West now call #Crimea referendum illegal? Free will runs both ways.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/444656456445345792

  • Glad you’re trying to get out

    Glad you’re trying to get out.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-03-14 12:51:00 UTC