Curt Doolittle

Form: Reply

  • So, Do We Need A Government?

    –“So we **do** need a government?”– We need a market for the production of commons. And we need a legal system. Whether we need government is still unsettled. But I would argue ‘no’. –“So it could still be privatized society, but we need to apply new laws to promote cooperation, trade, and prevent parasitism.”–

    Correct. One law, natural law, total prohibition on parasitism: physical, verbal, and by externality. A market for the production of commons. And as far as I know there is no ‘government’. It is useful to have a state department that foreign nations try to negotiate with. But even this is better conducted in public.

  • So, Do We Need A Government?

    –“So we **do** need a government?”– We need a market for the production of commons. And we need a legal system. Whether we need government is still unsettled. But I would argue ‘no’. –“So it could still be privatized society, but we need to apply new laws to promote cooperation, trade, and prevent parasitism.”–

    Correct. One law, natural law, total prohibition on parasitism: physical, verbal, and by externality. A market for the production of commons. And as far as I know there is no ‘government’. It is useful to have a state department that foreign nations try to negotiate with. But even this is better conducted in public.

  • The Next Era of Domestication: Ending Islam and the Religion of Ignorance

    —“Curt Doolittle, Humans are not businesses; we’re interdependent for survival. Even cooperations across the world have stop competing to complement each others weaknesses in the business space… not to talk about humans.”— [W]e are -because we evolved to be – super-predators that choose to cooperate ONLY when it is MORE beneficial to cooperate than to enslave, or exterminate.

    The west advocates meritocratic trade because as a more advanced society and can compete better than others on the basis of merit. So it is to the west’s advantage to advocate trade and commercialism and consumer capitalism. But if cooperation by trade (or any other method) has become parasitic, then it is to our advantage to return to rule. If not rule enslavement. If not enslavement, extermination. Invasion of our lands by semi-human, ignorant, mystical animals is enough of a reason to return to rule, if not rule, enslavement, if not enslavement, extermination. Since all societies want to exterminate muslims EXCEPT the west, if the west stops protecting freedom of religion then all societies will justifiable exterminate islam and mulsims. The muslim is teaching the wetsern man that he must not tolerate freedom of religion, since muslims do not practice a religoin, but a law, and a law is a political system not a religion. End the west’s protection of islam, and we end much of world conflict. Islam is the source of world conflict. It is a cancer that infects the west, Africa, hindus, and east asians. ‪#‎NewRight‬

  • The Next Era of Domestication: Ending Islam and the Religion of Ignorance

    —“Curt Doolittle, Humans are not businesses; we’re interdependent for survival. Even cooperations across the world have stop competing to complement each others weaknesses in the business space… not to talk about humans.”— [W]e are -because we evolved to be – super-predators that choose to cooperate ONLY when it is MORE beneficial to cooperate than to enslave, or exterminate.

    The west advocates meritocratic trade because as a more advanced society and can compete better than others on the basis of merit. So it is to the west’s advantage to advocate trade and commercialism and consumer capitalism. But if cooperation by trade (or any other method) has become parasitic, then it is to our advantage to return to rule. If not rule enslavement. If not enslavement, extermination. Invasion of our lands by semi-human, ignorant, mystical animals is enough of a reason to return to rule, if not rule, enslavement, if not enslavement, extermination. Since all societies want to exterminate muslims EXCEPT the west, if the west stops protecting freedom of religion then all societies will justifiable exterminate islam and mulsims. The muslim is teaching the wetsern man that he must not tolerate freedom of religion, since muslims do not practice a religoin, but a law, and a law is a political system not a religion. End the west’s protection of islam, and we end much of world conflict. Islam is the source of world conflict. It is a cancer that infects the west, Africa, hindus, and east asians. ‪#‎NewRight‬

  • Q&A: How Long to Raise IQ?

    —Q&A: “How long does it take to raise IQ?”— Well line 1M people by their IQ. Shoot everyone with an IQ below 100. IQ raised Instantly.

    [T]ake 100M people.
    Sterilize everyone with an IQ below 100.
    The effect will be almost immediate,
    but over two or three generations the IQ will consistently raise.
     
    Take 100M people.
    Pay people with IQ below 100 who are also unemployed
    or consistently unemployable, not to have children.
    The effect will appear within one generation, and continue to improve.
     
    Take 100M people.
    Hang all 3 strikes criminals every year without exception.
    Sterilize all with IQ below 90 before they are 16.
    Pay people with 100IQ or below who are unemployed
    or consistently unemployable not to have children,
    or to have only one child.
    Pay people with IQ over 125 to have children, and a lot if they have many.
     
    I mean, I can create scenarios all day long. I’ve done quite a few models and it depends on the initial distribution, the age range of reproduction, the number of children .. etc. Basically it happens as fast or slow as you want it to. Myself I just recommend the Chinese solution: punish the hell out of people who export costs and who have more than one kid, and reward people at the top who have more than one kid. Then let time do its thing.

  • Q&A: How Long to Raise IQ?

    —Q&A: “How long does it take to raise IQ?”— Well line 1M people by their IQ. Shoot everyone with an IQ below 100. IQ raised Instantly.

    [T]ake 100M people.
    Sterilize everyone with an IQ below 100.
    The effect will be almost immediate,
    but over two or three generations the IQ will consistently raise.
     
    Take 100M people.
    Pay people with IQ below 100 who are also unemployed
    or consistently unemployable, not to have children.
    The effect will appear within one generation, and continue to improve.
     
    Take 100M people.
    Hang all 3 strikes criminals every year without exception.
    Sterilize all with IQ below 90 before they are 16.
    Pay people with 100IQ or below who are unemployed
    or consistently unemployable not to have children,
    or to have only one child.
    Pay people with IQ over 125 to have children, and a lot if they have many.
     
    I mean, I can create scenarios all day long. I’ve done quite a few models and it depends on the initial distribution, the age range of reproduction, the number of children .. etc. Basically it happens as fast or slow as you want it to. Myself I just recommend the Chinese solution: punish the hell out of people who export costs and who have more than one kid, and reward people at the top who have more than one kid. Then let time do its thing.

  • Q&A: “How long does it take to raise IQ?”— Well line 1M people by their IQ. Sh

    —Q&A: “How long does it take to raise IQ?”—

    Well line 1M people by their IQ.

    Shoot everyone with an IQ below 100.

    IQ raised Instantly.

    Take 100M people. Sterilize everyone with an IQ below 100.

    The effect will be almost immediate, but over two or three generations the IQ will consistently raise.

    Take 100M people. Pay people with IQ below 100 who are also unemployed or consistently unemployable, not to have children. The effect will appear within one generation, and continue to improve.

    Take 100M people.

    Hang all 3 strikes criminals every year without exception.

    Sterilize all with IQ below 90 before they are 16.

    Pay people with 100IQ or below who are unemployed or consistently unemployable not to have children, or to have only one child.

    Pay people with IQ over 125 to have children, and a lot if they have many.

    I mean, I can create scenarios all day long. I’ve done quite a few models and it depends on the initial distribution, the age range of reproduction, the number of children .. etc.

    Basically it happns as fast or slow as you want it to.

    Myself I just recommend the chinese solution: punish the hell out of people who have more than one kid, and reward people at the top who have more than one kid.

    Let time do its thing.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-05 07:09:00 UTC

  • Yep

    Yep.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 18:48:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717061172630052864

    Reply addressees: @CharleeYeager

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717060621439664128

    IN REPLY TO:

    @ChuckkkHoover

    @curtdoolittle well, 8 generations to act like, 40 to be solidified.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717060621439664128

  • Thank you for all you do. Really. Love you man

    Thank you for all you do. Really. Love you man.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 18:31:00 UTC

  • It does not. Where are you getting that?

    It does not. Where are you getting that?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-04 18:26:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717055660828016642

    Reply addressees: @CharleeYeager @ReactionaryIan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717026105136263170

    IN REPLY TO:

    @ChuckkkHoover

    @curtdoolittle @ReactionaryIan the difference is long term vs short term. Takes at least 40 generations to domesticate. in the meantime?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717026105136263170