Curt Doolittle

Form: Reply

  • That might be enough

    That might be enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 19:24:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718882380329656321

    Reply addressees: @SanguineEmpiric @vosskriger

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718880388156796929

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718880388156796929

  • The Best Curriculum is Not Ron Paul’s. It’s Pacifist Judeo-Christian – not Aristocratic.

    [T]HE BEST CURRICULUM? —“Curt, would you recommend Ron Paul’s Mises-based homeschool curriculum as the best option out there for parents?”— Megan Cyloneight “Best” I don’t know. Ron Paul’s curriculum is pacifist. It produces good middle class universalist judeo-christians. Good subjects. People who can easily be conquered.

    To create aristocracy I would add to it: 1) Grammar, Logic, Testimony, and Prosecution (including the methods of lying) 2) Propertarian psychology, sociology, group competitive strategy. 3) The methods of legal order: american, british, german, russian, chinese – under which the people create commons while holding a government at bay. 4) The conduct of war by means of immigration, religion/conversion, political means, and economic means, and defense against each. 5) Fitness, Sports, Fighting, tactics, strategy, command and control. Ron Paul makes well informed, docile, employees. Curt Doolittle makes well informed unconquerable sheriffs.

    (later in the day…) Thanks for an interesting question by Megan Cyloneight today, I was able to understand that I had to add ‘prosecution’ to the curriculum, in order to change the student of western civilization from a christian servant to an aristocratic judge. 0) The matters of europa (ancient literature): Fairy Tales, Myths, Histories. 1) Grammar, Rhetoric, Logic, Testimony, Prosecution. 2) Propertarian psychology, economics, sociology, politics, evolutionary strategy, war.

    It is no use reserving prosecution and war for the adults. Enfranchise them all.

    ANOTHER THOUGHT There are three technologies of coercion: violence, economics, and shaming (inclusion/exclusion). I advocate teaching ALL THREE methods of ‘moral’ competition. Ron Paul is advocating only one. Economics is not a panacea. We must cover all the bases so to speak.

  • The Best Curriculum is Not Ron Paul’s. It’s Pacifist Judeo-Christian – not Aristocratic.

    [T]HE BEST CURRICULUM? —“Curt, would you recommend Ron Paul’s Mises-based homeschool curriculum as the best option out there for parents?”— Megan Cyloneight “Best” I don’t know. Ron Paul’s curriculum is pacifist. It produces good middle class universalist judeo-christians. Good subjects. People who can easily be conquered.

    To create aristocracy I would add to it: 1) Grammar, Logic, Testimony, and Prosecution (including the methods of lying) 2) Propertarian psychology, sociology, group competitive strategy. 3) The methods of legal order: american, british, german, russian, chinese – under which the people create commons while holding a government at bay. 4) The conduct of war by means of immigration, religion/conversion, political means, and economic means, and defense against each. 5) Fitness, Sports, Fighting, tactics, strategy, command and control. Ron Paul makes well informed, docile, employees. Curt Doolittle makes well informed unconquerable sheriffs.

    (later in the day…) Thanks for an interesting question by Megan Cyloneight today, I was able to understand that I had to add ‘prosecution’ to the curriculum, in order to change the student of western civilization from a christian servant to an aristocratic judge. 0) The matters of europa (ancient literature): Fairy Tales, Myths, Histories. 1) Grammar, Rhetoric, Logic, Testimony, Prosecution. 2) Propertarian psychology, economics, sociology, politics, evolutionary strategy, war.

    It is no use reserving prosecution and war for the adults. Enfranchise them all.

    ANOTHER THOUGHT There are three technologies of coercion: violence, economics, and shaming (inclusion/exclusion). I advocate teaching ALL THREE methods of ‘moral’ competition. Ron Paul is advocating only one. Economics is not a panacea. We must cover all the bases so to speak.

  • @ForeignPolicy Portland and Seattle are relative paradises because they escaped

    @ForeignPolicy Portland and Seattle are relative paradises because they escaped the great society movement, and remain almost entirely white

    @ForeignPolicy Heterogeneity, and moving people to capital, is a failed experiment. Then normative costs are higher than the discount made.

    @ForeignPolicy Move capital to people and cause local reformation do not move people to capital and cause local degradation of civic society

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 11:52:00 UTC

  • THE BEST CURRICULUM? —“Curt, would you recommend Ron Paul’s Mises-based homesc

    THE BEST CURRICULUM?

    —“Curt, would you recommend Ron Paul’s Mises-based homeschool curriculum as the best option out there for parents?”— Megan Cyloneight

    “Best” I don’t know. Ron Paul’s curriculum is pacifist. It produces good middle class universalist judeo-christians. Good subjects. People who can easily be conquered.

    To create aristocracy I would add to it:

    1) Grammar, Logic, Testimony, and Prosecution (including the methods of lying)

    2) Propertarian psychology, sociology, group competitive strategy.

    3) The methods of legal order: american, british, german, russian, chinese – under which the people create commons while holding a government at bay.

    4) The conduct of war by means of immigration, religion/conversion, political means, and economic means, and defense against each.

    5) Fitness, Sports, Fighting, tactics, strategy, command and control.

    Ron Paul makes well informed, docile, employees.

    Curt Doolittle makes well informed unconquerable sheriffs.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 03:44:00 UTC

  • “Your major assumption is that IQ is a reasonable substitute for intelligence.”-

    -“Your major assumption is that IQ is a reasonable substitute for intelligence.”—

    Intelligence(“g”, short term memory, information mode, general knowledge, ‘rationality of wants’) + gender bias + psychological factors: (Impulsivity, Aggression, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Worrying) is as close as we need to be to make general statements about groups of people.

    There is literally NO evidence that suggests the contrary.

    And to further criticize the position, the correspondence between the IQ proxy for intelligence and all other personality factors is high enough that IQ is also a proxy for positive personality traits.

    So yes, as a general rule, and when we speak politically we rely entirely on general rules, IQ is a sufficient proxy for demonstrated (existential) intelligence. I think this is a bit of a mistake since it does not demonstrate the problem of personality traits and information model.

    We have a pretty good model of intelligence: rational action, creativity, rate of learning. But these two ( factors: verbal and spatial) overwhelm all other variables in causation.

    NOW

    —“the g factor will account for a smaller proportion of individual differences in cognitive tests scores at higher scores on the g factor.”–

    Meaning that as we get smarter we tend to specialize.

    As we get ‘dumber’ we tend to get more the same.

    CHALLENGES

    It appears that western openness to experience is a candidate for western innovation.

    It is a mistake not to publish the full set of test data. Particularly personality. ( and autism/solipsism).

    Obscuring this information is intentional because it would destroy the universalist mythos.

    This is no different from the church suppressing science

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-08 07:56:00 UTC

  • sally you do realize that saying that is nothing more than saying that horoscope

    sally you do realize that saying that is nothing more than saying that horoscopes matter.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 23:03:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718212593110925313

    Reply addressees: @sallyeastman1 @SpiritSplice

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718204562256109572

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718204562256109572

  • competition

    competition

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 20:53:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718180004920733697

    Reply addressees: @ne0colonial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718176798232616960

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718176798232616960

  • I’d have to be sure that an such rent was in fact public

    I’d have to be sure that an such rent was in fact public.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 20:37:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718175827821727744

    Reply addressees: @ne0colonial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718172966089928704

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718172966089928704

  • love you for this

    love you for this.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 17:02:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718121875109519360

    Reply addressees: @panzerbunny457

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718119684466315266

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718119684466315266