Form: Reply

  • Mr President you need to use us. If you do not, you will lose the battle. #Trump

    Mr President you need to use us. If you do not, you will lose the battle. #Trump You are not “managing your base”.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-18 00:23:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/842894261204992005

  • The Dimensions of The Pack Response

    (Psychology) 1 – as to any ‘beginning’ to the universe, the central question is whether time has any meaning at the extremes. We simply do not know the answer. But we know enough to know, that we do not know the answer. Ergo, any argument to ad-infinitum is no more likely than any argument to singularity because we don’t know if there is a difference. Note that I think in terms of persistence.  And so whether there is a beginning to the universe is not as material as whether we persist (survive) the behavior of the universe. 2 – As long as the set of forces that constitute mass-radiation-space-time are constant, there is no reason that the universe or universes do not simply pulse indefinitely, although it is very difficult to say whether they follow in sequence or repeat the same time over and over again. We just don’t know. 3 – there are deep psychological reasons that cause us to seek the psychological safety of the pack in various group activities – and they are chiefly the result of living in large numbers rather than consanguineous bands and tribes. This need exists at the personal subconscious level, the group level(community), and the tribal (regional) level. And religions evolved to assist us in establishing normative expectations of one another on the one hand, and reducing the burden of uncertainty and fear of outsiders and being outside on the other. 4 – As we have seen people seek replacement for talking around the campfire, being read to, watching a play or movie, listening to talking in church, listinening to lectures in university, watching people talk on television. The phenomenon is always the same. 5 – We have seen people able to obtain the feeling of submission of reason to the pack (which is what feels good about religion) by many possible means: disciplined ritual, disciplined though (stoicism’s virtues), disciplined internal conversation (prayer), and disciplined quietude (buddhist meditation). 6 – We have seen people use music and dancing, group runs and walks, organized sports, hunting, festival, holiday, and feast – even parade and war. 7 – Each of these dimensions provides increasing safety of the pack in a world where – since agrarianism – we have existed uncomfortably as individuals. This allows us to ‘rest’ our minds from teh constant effort of reason and our constant battle with uncertainty whenever modernity’s comforting consumptions are insufficient for us to counter alienation that it produces. 8 – The question remains why we must rely on lies (supernatural) rather than myths, legends, and aspirations. There is no reason to rely upon lies, superstitions, and falsehoods – because they are, just like alcohol and drugs, methods of escape and deceit, and self harm. The wonder of being human, of what we have done in our short time, and what we may yet do, is enough for us.

  • The Dimensions of The Pack Response

    (Psychology) 1 – as to any ‘beginning’ to the universe, the central question is whether time has any meaning at the extremes. We simply do not know the answer. But we know enough to know, that we do not know the answer. Ergo, any argument to ad-infinitum is no more likely than any argument to singularity because we don’t know if there is a difference. Note that I think in terms of persistence.  And so whether there is a beginning to the universe is not as material as whether we persist (survive) the behavior of the universe. 2 – As long as the set of forces that constitute mass-radiation-space-time are constant, there is no reason that the universe or universes do not simply pulse indefinitely, although it is very difficult to say whether they follow in sequence or repeat the same time over and over again. We just don’t know. 3 – there are deep psychological reasons that cause us to seek the psychological safety of the pack in various group activities – and they are chiefly the result of living in large numbers rather than consanguineous bands and tribes. This need exists at the personal subconscious level, the group level(community), and the tribal (regional) level. And religions evolved to assist us in establishing normative expectations of one another on the one hand, and reducing the burden of uncertainty and fear of outsiders and being outside on the other. 4 – As we have seen people seek replacement for talking around the campfire, being read to, watching a play or movie, listening to talking in church, listinening to lectures in university, watching people talk on television. The phenomenon is always the same. 5 – We have seen people able to obtain the feeling of submission of reason to the pack (which is what feels good about religion) by many possible means: disciplined ritual, disciplined though (stoicism’s virtues), disciplined internal conversation (prayer), and disciplined quietude (buddhist meditation). 6 – We have seen people use music and dancing, group runs and walks, organized sports, hunting, festival, holiday, and feast – even parade and war. 7 – Each of these dimensions provides increasing safety of the pack in a world where – since agrarianism – we have existed uncomfortably as individuals. This allows us to ‘rest’ our minds from teh constant effort of reason and our constant battle with uncertainty whenever modernity’s comforting consumptions are insufficient for us to counter alienation that it produces. 8 – The question remains why we must rely on lies (supernatural) rather than myths, legends, and aspirations. There is no reason to rely upon lies, superstitions, and falsehoods – because they are, just like alcohol and drugs, methods of escape and deceit, and self harm. The wonder of being human, of what we have done in our short time, and what we may yet do, is enough for us.

  • Using Horizontal and Vertical Classes

    —“Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and income level is that a correct assessment?”— Um… well, I use genetic, social, occupational, and economic classes – even though they overlap a great deal as horizontal classes. And I use the three specializations in means of coercion as vertical classes. But since there is such a high correlation between genetic classes and all other horizontal classes, unless I say otherwise, I am generally referring to genetic classes. And genetic class refers to a portfolio of fitnesses that include IQ as well as personality, morphology, and health. So with that qualification, I think I would say that just as IQ a high predictor in life, it is not the only predictor. But for purpose of general argument it is as good a rule of thumb as any other. Curt Doolittle

  • Using Horizontal and Vertical Classes

    —“Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and income level is that a correct assessment?”— Um… well, I use genetic, social, occupational, and economic classes – even though they overlap a great deal as horizontal classes. And I use the three specializations in means of coercion as vertical classes. But since there is such a high correlation between genetic classes and all other horizontal classes, unless I say otherwise, I am generally referring to genetic classes. And genetic class refers to a portfolio of fitnesses that include IQ as well as personality, morphology, and health. So with that qualification, I think I would say that just as IQ a high predictor in life, it is not the only predictor. But for purpose of general argument it is as good a rule of thumb as any other. Curt Doolittle

  • “Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and

    —“Curt, I’d like to ask about your break down of class. It seems based on IQ and income level is that a correct assessment?”—

    Um… well, I use genetic, social, occupational, and economic classes – even though they overlap a great deal as horizontal classes.

    And I use the three specializations in means of coercion as vertical classes.

    But since there is such a high correlation between genetic classes and all other horizontal classes, unless I say otherwise, I am generally referring to genetic classes.

    And genetic class refers to a portfolio of fitnesses that include IQ as well as personality, morphology, and health.

    So with that qualification, I think I would say that just as IQ a high predictor in life, it is not the only predictor. But for purpose of general argument it is as good a rule of thumb as any other.

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-13 22:04:00 UTC

  • 1 – as to ‘beginning’ the central question is whether time has any meaning at th

    1 – as to ‘beginning’ the central question is whether time has any meaning at the extremes. We simply do not know the answer. But we know enough to know, that we do not know the answer. Ergo, any argument to ad-infinitum is no more likely than any argument to singularity because we don’t know if there is a difference.

    2 – As long as the set of forces that constitute mass-radiation-space-time are constant, there is no reason that the universe or universes do not simply pulse indefinitely, although it is very difficult to say whether they follow in sequence or repeat the same time over and over again. We just don’t know.

    3 – there are deep psychological reasons that cause us to seek the psychological safety of the pack in various group activities – and they are chiefly the result of living in large numbers rather than consanguineous bands and tribes. This need exists at the personal subconscious level, the group level(community), and the tribal (regional) level. And religions evolved to assist us in establishing normative expectations of one another on the one hand, and reducing the burden of uncertainty and fear of outsiders and being outside on the other.

    4 – As we have seen people seek replacement for talking around the campfire, being read to, watching a play or movie, listening to talking in church, listinening to lectures in university, watching people talk on television. The phenomenon is always the same.

    5 – We have seen people able to obtain the feeling of submission of reason to the pack (which is what feels good about religion) by many possible means: disciplined ritual, disciplined though (stoicism’s virtues), disciplined internal conversation (prayer), and disciplined quietude (buddhist meditation).

    6 – We have seen people use music and dancing, group runs and walks, organized sports, hunting, festival, holiday, and feast – even parade and war.

    7 – Each of these dimensions provides increasing safety of the pack in a world where – since agrarianism – we have existed uncomfortably as individuals. This allows us to ‘rest’ our minds from teh constant effort of reason and our constant battle with uncertainty whenever modernity’s comforting consumptions are insufficient for us to counter alienation that it produces.

    8 – The question remains why we must rely on lies (supernatural) rather than myths, legends, and aspirations. There is no reason to rely upon lies, superstitions, and falsehoods – because they are, just like alcohol and drugs, methods of escape and deceit, and self harm. The wonder of being human, of what we have done in our short time, and what we may yet do, is enough for us.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-12 14:12:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) —“I don’t think there is a barrier that the pseudo-scientific

    (from elsewhere)

    —“I don’t think there is a barrier that the pseudo-scientific nature of your position doesn’t merit. No.”—

    Interesting, so, you would classify (a) analysis of incentives resulting in the phenomenon, (b) the results of tests of cognitive biases demonstrating the phenomenon, (c) Kuhn’s work in the scientific method (structure of scientific revolutions) in which the paradigm (orthodoxy) suppresses invention (heterodoxy), (d) the evidence of long running topical conflicts between orthodox and heterodox editing on the medium in question (Wikipedia), (e) and the social discord and shift in the economic viability of orthodox (mainstream) media that is caused by the availablilty of new lower coast media (the internet), (f) and the record in book editing, journal editing, and the peer review process of reinforcement of orthodox and rejection of heterodox arguments, as PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC?

    Or is that analysis scientific precisely because it is the primary struggle the discipline of science struggles against? (it is, which is why Popper and Kuhn wrote about it).

    Or more correctly, is your continued use of ad hom’s, name calling, rallying, and shaming merely a straw man – an attempt to lie. An act of fraud by which to defend your malinvestment in a pubescent ideology for the purpose of building personal decidability that results in unearned status signals and self worth? And your retaliation by fraud against me and others like me for having deprived you of your unearned self worth?

    It’s OK. I know the answer. And by your bad manners, and childish antics, you’ve given the the opportunity to demonstrate it for everyone else.

    Unfortunately the cost of demonstrating the childish antics of the emotionally, socially, intellectually, and economically infantilized is fairly high. And unfortunately, by paying that price I develop the reputation among the infantilized of “being an ass”, because the infantilized cannot bear the loss of their malinvestment. But I must do so out of self defense, and moral commitment, for the simple reason that the infantile, feminine, marxist use of gossip, rallying, and shaming in the absence of judicial duel, is the reason that the left was able to succeed in out-shouting the right.

    Thus endeth the lesson.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-12 08:32:00 UTC

  • Which Ethnic Group, Among Caucasoid, Is The Most Neotenic?

    Show me where this is known. East asians most by far. Europeans next. Africans least. And everyone else in between. Europeans selected for more feminine traits resulting in thinner skin and the diversity of hair and eye color. But by every measure, of which testosterone (and penis size) is the most obvious, whites are second to east asians in neotenic (pedomorphic) selection.

    https://www.quora.com/Which-ethnic-group-among-Caucasoid-is-the-most-neotenic

  • Actually, I”m going to remove them because I no longer consider them of intellec

    Actually, I”m going to remove them because I no longer consider them of intellectual value.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-11 14:21:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/840568333556682752

    Reply addressees: @itsles3

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/839979779239600128


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/839979779239600128