@POTUS https://t.co/pt8zcx1M9I

Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 00:02:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896884637024366592

@POTUS https://t.co/pt8zcx1M9I

Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 00:02:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896884637024366592
—“Curt, do you see a difference in competitiveness between people of similar IQ quotients? Do you think people are more likely to cooperate at higher IQs or vice versa?”—
As far as I know competitiveness is a dominance trait, and I have not seen variations in dominance by intelligence, only in *technique used* by intelligence. In other words, smarter people have a broader range of competitive tools to work with and so you see a broader variety of expressions of dominance.
People at higher IQ’s have more opportunities for fruitful cooperation because peers are more likely to possess a valuable position, resources, and idea, even if they have fewer people that they can cooperate with.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 20:21:00 UTC
—“CURT: ARE WE LOOKING AT A RACE WAR?”—
No.
We are looking at the exhaustion of the value of a central government that was imposed upon the various states in order to maintain control over westward expansion across the continent after the louisiana purchase.
At present there is no further value in that government, since the various regions have very different ambitions, and the six immigrant cities have various ambitions. All these ambitions are at odds.
It is possible to devolve the federal government out of the business of norms, and limited to territorial defense, insurer of last resort, and resolution of disputes in interstate trade.
What we should seek is devolution, elimination of the house, senate, and presidency, and limited secession, leaving the governors to administer what remains of the federal government.
We will then allow people in the country to sort into regions by county, with freedom of association and disassociation at the county level. This will organically divide the country into natural territories. and it will allow us to create a diverse set of polities suitable to different peoples.
We will separate white conservatives and progressives and remove the left from our gene pool (again).
The long term effect will be the rapid increase in high trust and desirability of conservative white territories and the continuous decline of urban and coastal cities into favellas.
Military families will concentrate in conservative regions, and the end will be determined by natural consequences.
Do not make it a race issue, make it a ‘choice for all of us to live as we wish’ – an issue for everyone.
Freedom of association and disassociation will do the rest
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 19:41:00 UTC
—“CURT: ARE WE LOOKING AT A RACE WAR?”—
No.
We are looking at the exhaustion of the value of a central government that was imposed upon the various states in order to maintain control over westward expansion across the continent after the louisiana purchase.
At present there is no further value in that government, since the various regions have very different ambitions, and the six immigrant cities have various ambitions. All these ambitions are at odds.
It is possible to devolve the federal government out of the business of norms, and limited to territorial defense, insurer of last resort, and resolution of disputes in interstate trade.
What we should seek is devolution, elimination of the house, senate, and presidency, and limited secession, leaving the governors to administer what remains of the federal government.
We will then allow people in the country to sort into regions by county, with freedom of association and disassociation at the county level. This will organically divide the country into natural territories. and it will allow us to create a diverse set of polities suitable to different peoples.
We will separate white conservatives and progressives and remove the left from our gene pool (again).
The long term effect will be the rapid increase in high trust and desirability of conservative white territories and the continuous decline of urban and coastal cities into favellas.
Military families will concentrate in conservative regions, and the end will be determined by natural consequences.
Do not make it a race issue, make it a ‘choice for all of us to live as we wish’ – an issue for everyone.
Freedom of association and disassociation will do the rest
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 18:23:00 UTC
Привет, Инна! С днем рождения!
Вы выглядите счастливы на своих фотографиях!
У тебя красивый мужчина!
Надеюсь, ваша милая девочка тоже счастлива.
Желаю вам еще одного хорошего года. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-12 08:53:00 UTC
Why? Because Neoteny/Dimorphism most visible and rapid means of variation in behavior.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 14:28:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896015496793010176
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895966471813255168
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle Selection acts on individuals and close kin only. Lots of things change, not just endocrine expression.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895966471813255168
So again. Argument stands. Because that’s what the data says: all substantive reproductive diffs are in branch, neoteny, dimorphism.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 14:27:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896015191267258368
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895966471813255168
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle Selection acts on individuals and close kin only. Lots of things change, not just endocrine expression.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895966471813255168
Half true. Ex: Demand for masculinity changes with economic conditions, and affects everything, incl: fashion, repro., mate sel.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 14:25:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896014662977847296
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895966471813255168
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle Selection acts on individuals and close kin only. Lots of things change, not just endocrine expression.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895966471813255168
As far as I know this is what the data shows. HHS groups differ almost entirely by these mechanisms – which allow rapid change.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 04:08:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895859546387865601
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895788592878026758
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle People adapt to their environment over evolutionary time.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895788592878026758
Correct, and they adapt as a group, primarily through selection and via env. demand – via endocrine expression, as I stated.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 04:06:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895858828343955456
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895788592878026758
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle People adapt to their environment over evolutionary time.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895788592878026758