Revolution and civil war. The civil war never ended. It’s still the same battle lines.
https://www.quora.com/What-does-this-trend-of-increasing-political-polarisation-in-2018-mean-for-the-United-States-of-America
Revolution and civil war. The civil war never ended. It’s still the same battle lines.
https://www.quora.com/What-does-this-trend-of-increasing-political-polarisation-in-2018-mean-for-the-United-States-of-America
East Asians evolved from an earlier fork of Africans than Europeans. Africa still contains both almond eyed and round eyed genetic groups. And we can clearly trace east asian genetic development. (Unfortunately, the romans failed to build the wall the chinese built to keep out the steppe-desert people, and we continue to be the victims of their genetic strategy: low cost high reproduction.)
We are still trying to discover how pre-indo-europeans evolved before and during the ice age. We simply do not have good evidence for it. We understand how europeans (colder climate multi-colored haired and fairer whites) and west asians (warmer climate, black haired darker whites) coevolved. We know about when and how ‘whiteness’ evolved. But the ‘out of africa’ is only part of the story. Like the neandertal genetic discovery, there is still something we don’t quite know yet.
FWIW: the reason east asians and whites ‘differ’ is greater neoteny (pedomorphism). Which is why east asians have VERY low testosterone, and europeans (whites) have more than asians and less than all other races and subraces. And this is why east asians can have longer lifespans.
In fact, (this is both humorous and obvious) we can judge neoteny by both facial features and penis size – which makes for fascinating dinner table conversation. lol 😉
https://www.quora.com/White-people-look-different-from-Asians-Were-there-flat-faced-Neanderthals-in-the-Far-East
Buzzfeed is incredibly anti-white, and incredibly left leaning. But that’s pretty common in media.
https://www.quora.com/Does-BuzzFeed-seem-incredibly-racist-to-anyone-else
If you want to narrow it to one thing, other than it’s merely a vehicle for the industrialization of lying, it’s the perverse malincentives that first mobilize then destroy all accumulated intergenerational capital, in every form, from genetic, to familial, to personal, to fixed, to habitual, to normative, to cultural, to institutional, to knowledge, and to truth itself.
Democracy is the informational equivalent of biological cancer: unregulated consumption (reproduction). Postmodernism, which is the current state religion is reducible to ‘say whatever we have to in order to increase consumption’. It is the worst of all possible worlds.
Democracy makes mankind a plague of locusts on the carrying capacity of not only our planet, but our genes themselves. Just why this is, is quite technical for the economically ignorant. But it is what it is.
https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-flaws-of-Democracy
america is, believe it or not, despite teh propaganda, the least racist country other than canada.
https://www.quora.com/Is-America-the-most-racist-western-country
If I told you the correct answer I’d probably be banned for ‘unpleasant but true speech’, but
1) it has a significant genetic component,
2) as well as demographic,
3) as well as cultural .
But let’s say it always has been this way.
If I ask you to look up IQ by country. And then ask you to look up literacy by country. And then look up the number of books translated in that country. And then look up academic publications by country. And then if I ask you to look up the IQ demographics for religious, moral, legal, western-philosophical, and scientific classes. And then ask you to look up the content of the language, laws, narratives, and marital structures.
What you can’t (readily) look up is the distribution of (psychotic)female-to-male(autistic) brain structures and therefore personality traits by IQ, Nation, Race, Subrace, and Class. What is harder to look up is the degree of neoteny or its reversal by race and subrace. And it’s somewhat difficult to look up how neoteny or its opposite, can work in both male and female directions. Because it will take you months to put together all the research from all the different sources.
And what you might find is that:
a) small things in large numbers make vast differences.
b) that IQ and industriousness pretty much produce deterministic distributions.
c) countries have to govern for the middle of the population and the further than number is below IQ105 the worse it gets.
d) The underclasses (below 105) are 5 to 6 times as costly as the upper classes are productive(above 120), and are an outright burden as the number decreases.
e) That the middle east has the worst of all conditions, which is high population density of many competing tribes with high genetic ‘clannishness’ through centuries of inbreeding, as well as pervasive poverty, as well as centuries of ignorance, a justification of ignorance, the habituation of impulsiveness, none to little concept of objective scientific truth as we understand it, a primitive poetic language lacking operational grammar and semantics.
Just how it is.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-middle-east-so-mystic
East Asians evolved from an earlier fork of Africans than Europeans. Africa still contains both almond eyed and round eyed genetic groups. And we can clearly trace east asian genetic development. (Unfortunately, the romans failed to build the wall the chinese built to keep out the steppe-desert people, and we continue to be the victims of their genetic strategy: low cost high reproduction.)
We are still trying to discover how pre-indo-europeans evolved before and during the ice age. We simply do not have good evidence for it. We understand how europeans (colder climate multi-colored haired and fairer whites) and west asians (warmer climate, black haired darker whites) coevolved. We know about when and how ‘whiteness’ evolved. But the ‘out of africa’ is only part of the story. Like the neandertal genetic discovery, there is still something we don’t quite know yet.
FWIW: the reason east asians and whites ‘differ’ is greater neoteny (pedomorphism). Which is why east asians have VERY low testosterone, and europeans (whites) have more than asians and less than all other races and subraces. And this is why east asians can have longer lifespans.
In fact, (this is both humorous and obvious) we can judge neoteny by both facial features and penis size – which makes for fascinating dinner table conversation. lol 😉
https://www.quora.com/White-people-look-different-from-Asians-Were-there-flat-faced-Neanderthals-in-the-Far-East
1 – Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 18:15:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948981108036849666
Reply addressees: @KyleHen44723716
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948847618138034176
IN REPLY TO:
@KyleHen44723716
@curtdoolittle A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948847618138034176
I’m a fan of both. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 01:36:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948729820917260288
Reply addressees: @RealJamesWoods @Twitter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948708188471279616
IN REPLY TO:
@RealJamesWoods
My New Year’s resolution on @Twitter is to be as positive as possible and entertain all points of view with dignity. So many people recently have graciously complimented my work, while disagreeing with my politics. I don’t want to feel any divisiveness with these very kind fans.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948708188471279616
There has never been an empire this fragile in history.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-03 23:57:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948704855467741184
Reply addressees: @zwyrw @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948703292191920129
IN REPLY TO:
@zwyrw
@curtdoolittle @TOOEdit You may point me to an article where you address this problem: Where are the incentives for revolution today, where is the potential agent, money, vision. I don’t see any of that. We are years away from this, I think. I live in europe and have similar impression from USA.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948703292191920129