Form: Reply

  • RT @realDonaldTrump: The Fake News Media never fails. Hard to ignore this fact f

    RT @realDonaldTrump: The Fake News Media never fails. Hard to ignore this fact from the Vice President of Facebook Ads, Rob Goldman! https:…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-18 03:21:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/965063646673035264

  • “QUESTION: Are Italians European?”—(a follower) This is one of those ethnic qu

    –“QUESTION: Are Italians European?”—(a follower)

    This is one of those ethnic questions that’s misleading. Because it confuses the modern state of italy, with the italian peninsula with the people who live there, which include french, swiss german, german, austrian, northern italian (germanic), and southern italian (mediterranean and greek).

    Southern italians (especially from Naples south) are of greek and anatolian origins. Northern Italians whether very early (Etru) , Italian (Ital), or later ‘invaders) Germanic) are all of Danubian (Germanic) origins. People of Sardinia are the remainders of the earliest europeans. People of Sicily are a blend of pretty much everyone in the ancient world, because Sicily was an extremely important port for transporting goods around the mediterranean using the sailing technology available in the ancient world.

    **General Rule of Thumb: **

    If you work at it a bit you can pretty easily identify almost anyone’s tribal origins.

    Black hair and ‘swarthy” complexion and body hair = South route around the black sea = Anatolian/Eastern-Mediterranean/ Indo-Iranian. Or as I am often corrected “West Eurasians” (or middle easterners)

    Brown, Red, Blonde hair, very white complexion = Northern route around the Black Sea. Northern route people still exist in at least three if not four variations: atlantics, germanics (central europe), nordics, and northern and eastern slavs. The history of southern slavs is extremely complicated and I end up offending someone if I talk about it. But by and large they vary from very old peoples who started metalsmithing in what is today Bulgaria, to the remains of the steppe people who migrated there during the last major migration periods. The problem is that the spanish are largely from Atlantic and Celts and often have dark hair but are from the same lineage (R1b) – just less inbred with later versions of europeans.

    Something ‘very different’ happened around the black sea either before or after the deluge. we don’t know what but it caused repeated waves of expansion with the latest being the Yamna (horse) people what gave europe her ancient culture = although pre-yamna, yamna, germanic, christian, and modern values still exist if you understand which originated which set of ideas.

    But europeans, in general, regardless of earlier (southern), or later (multiple waves of northern), origins, evolve from what we (incorrectly) call ‘Caucuses’, but is apparently poland-ukraine-southern russia, with the caucuses the line of demarcation between the european, indo-iranian, and (now extinct) people that invaded india.

    The word Aryan is correct (Yamna expansion), but impolitic in the current century, and “White” is a poor substitute for Ethnic Europeans.

    We are, after all, all from the exceptional grazing and farmland between the north sea in poland, the black sea in ukraine, and the north of the caspian in southern russia.

    Europeans originated along the north sea, baltic sea, black sea, and caspian sea, and their russo finnic ancestors the arctic sea.

    It’s just that trade in the mediterranean was much more profitable for anyone – until the atlantic and now pacific came along.

    Some of us find it ironic that Poland is probably origin of the european diaspora. 😉

    Italy empirically (by all measures) consists of two very different countries – north and south. Just like Belgium has french and germanic under the same state. Just as americans have nine different cultures under the same state.

    The reason different countries do not separate is that it is economically disadvantagous to one party or both parties.

    For example, catalonia (wealthy and culturally and genetically different) vs spain (poor), and north italy vs south italy, and west ukraine vs east ukraine. and the northern states vs the southern states vs the plains states, vs the coastal west (ecotopia). Or canada vs quebec.

    All of these countries would be better off alone, but the industrial revolution and fiat credit made it difficult for small counteries to engage in defense.

    Today, a handful of nuclear weapons and an armed populace (switzerland) cna preserve independence (sovereignty) against any and everyone.

    **Therefore:**

    Italian = State (government)

    North italian and South Italian Countries (natural cultural and territorial differences)

    Italian Culture = Generally referring to language and diet and festivals

    Italy = a territory ranging from the alps to the tip of the peninsula.

    Ethnicity = European, vs Germanic vs Greek, vs Mediterranean are Ethnic Groups. Germanic = a prehistoric culture and myth of the home and hearth.

    Christianity = an old world mythology and literature of politics.

    Modernity = The enlightenment restoration of our ancient judicial, empirical, stoic and Aristotelian traditions.

    Three or four races. A handful of subraces. Thirty or so minor subraces. A few hundred super-tribes.

    Humans are endlessly fascinating. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 20:21:00 UTC

  • “QUESTION: Are Italians European?”—(a follower) This is one of those ethnic qu

    –“QUESTION: Are Italians European?”—(a follower) This is one of those ethnic questions that’s misleading. Because it confuses the modern state of italy, with the italian peninsula with the people who live there, which include french, swiss german, german, austrian, northern italian (germanic), and southern italian (mediterranean and greek). Southern italians (especially from Naples south) are of greek and anatolian origins. Northern Italians whether very early (Etru) , Italian (Ital), or later ‘invaders) Germanic) are all of Danubian (Germanic) origins. People of Sardinia are the remainders of the earliest europeans. People of Sicily are a blend of pretty much everyone in the ancient world, because Sicily was an extremely important port for transporting goods around the mediterranean using the sailing technology available in the ancient world. **General Rule of Thumb: ** If you work at it a bit you can pretty easily identify almost anyone’s tribal origins. Black hair and ‘swarthy” complexion and body hair = South route around the black sea = Anatolian/Eastern-Mediterranean/ Indo-Iranian. Or as I am often corrected “West Eurasians” (or middle easterners) Brown, Red, Blonde hair, very white complexion = Northern route around the Black Sea. Northern route people still exist in at least three if not four variations: atlantics, germanics (central europe), nordics, and northern and eastern slavs. The history of southern slavs is extremely complicated and I end up offending someone if I talk about it. But by and large they vary from very old peoples who started metalsmithing in what is today Bulgaria, to the remains of the steppe people who migrated there during the last major migration periods. The problem is that the spanish are largely from Atlantic and Celts and often have dark hair but are from the same lineage (R1b) – just less inbred with later versions of europeans. Something ‘very different’ happened around the black sea either before or after the deluge. we don’t know what but it caused repeated waves of expansion with the latest being the Yamna (horse) people what gave europe her ancient culture = although pre-yamna, yamna, germanic, christian, and modern values still exist if you understand which originated which set of ideas. But europeans, in general, regardless of earlier (southern), or later (multiple waves of northern), origins, evolve from what we (incorrectly) call ‘Caucuses’, but is apparently poland-ukraine-southern russia, with the caucuses the line of demarcation between the european, indo-iranian, and (now extinct) people that invaded india. The word Aryan is correct (Yamna expansion), but impolitic in the current century, and “White” is a poor substitute for Ethnic Europeans. We are, after all, all from the exceptional grazing and farmland between the north sea in poland, the black sea in ukraine, and the north of the caspian in southern russia. Europeans originated along the north sea, baltic sea, black sea, and caspian sea, and their russo finnic ancestors the arctic sea. It’s just that trade in the mediterranean was much more profitable for anyone – until the atlantic and now pacific came along. Some of us find it ironic that Poland is probably origin of the european diaspora. 😉 Italy empirically (by all measures) consists of two very different countries – north and south. Just like Belgium has french and germanic under the same state. Just as americans have nine different cultures under the same state. The reason different countries do not separate is that it is economically disadvantagous to one party or both parties. For example, catalonia (wealthy and culturally and genetically different) vs spain (poor), and north italy vs south italy, and west ukraine vs east ukraine. and the northern states vs the southern states vs the plains states, vs the coastal west (ecotopia). Or canada vs quebec. All of these countries would be better off alone, but the industrial revolution and fiat credit made it difficult for small counteries to engage in defense. Today, a handful of nuclear weapons and an armed populace (switzerland) cna preserve independence (sovereignty) against any and everyone. **Therefore:** Italian = State (government) North italian and South Italian Countries (natural cultural and territorial differences) Italian Culture = Generally referring to language and diet and festivals Italy = a territory ranging from the alps to the tip of the peninsula. Ethnicity = European, vs Germanic vs Greek, vs Mediterranean are Ethnic Groups. Germanic = a prehistoric culture and myth of the home and hearth. Christianity = an old world mythology and literature of politics. Modernity = The enlightenment restoration of our ancient judicial, empirical, stoic and Aristotelian traditions. Three or four races. A handful of subraces. Thirty or so minor subraces. A few hundred super-tribes. Humans are endlessly fascinating. 😉
  • “QUESTION: Are Italians European?”—(a follower) This is one of those ethnic qu

    –“QUESTION: Are Italians European?”—(a follower) This is one of those ethnic questions that’s misleading. Because it confuses the modern state of italy, with the italian peninsula with the people who live there, which include french, swiss german, german, austrian, northern italian (germanic), and southern italian (mediterranean and greek). Southern italians (especially from Naples south) are of greek and anatolian origins. Northern Italians whether very early (Etru) , Italian (Ital), or later ‘invaders) Germanic) are all of Danubian (Germanic) origins. People of Sardinia are the remainders of the earliest europeans. People of Sicily are a blend of pretty much everyone in the ancient world, because Sicily was an extremely important port for transporting goods around the mediterranean using the sailing technology available in the ancient world. **General Rule of Thumb: ** If you work at it a bit you can pretty easily identify almost anyone’s tribal origins. Black hair and ‘swarthy” complexion and body hair = South route around the black sea = Anatolian/Eastern-Mediterranean/ Indo-Iranian. Or as I am often corrected “West Eurasians” (or middle easterners) Brown, Red, Blonde hair, very white complexion = Northern route around the Black Sea. Northern route people still exist in at least three if not four variations: atlantics, germanics (central europe), nordics, and northern and eastern slavs. The history of southern slavs is extremely complicated and I end up offending someone if I talk about it. But by and large they vary from very old peoples who started metalsmithing in what is today Bulgaria, to the remains of the steppe people who migrated there during the last major migration periods. The problem is that the spanish are largely from Atlantic and Celts and often have dark hair but are from the same lineage (R1b) – just less inbred with later versions of europeans. Something ‘very different’ happened around the black sea either before or after the deluge. we don’t know what but it caused repeated waves of expansion with the latest being the Yamna (horse) people what gave europe her ancient culture = although pre-yamna, yamna, germanic, christian, and modern values still exist if you understand which originated which set of ideas. But europeans, in general, regardless of earlier (southern), or later (multiple waves of northern), origins, evolve from what we (incorrectly) call ‘Caucuses’, but is apparently poland-ukraine-southern russia, with the caucuses the line of demarcation between the european, indo-iranian, and (now extinct) people that invaded india. The word Aryan is correct (Yamna expansion), but impolitic in the current century, and “White” is a poor substitute for Ethnic Europeans. We are, after all, all from the exceptional grazing and farmland between the north sea in poland, the black sea in ukraine, and the north of the caspian in southern russia. Europeans originated along the north sea, baltic sea, black sea, and caspian sea, and their russo finnic ancestors the arctic sea. It’s just that trade in the mediterranean was much more profitable for anyone – until the atlantic and now pacific came along. Some of us find it ironic that Poland is probably origin of the european diaspora. 😉 Italy empirically (by all measures) consists of two very different countries – north and south. Just like Belgium has french and germanic under the same state. Just as americans have nine different cultures under the same state. The reason different countries do not separate is that it is economically disadvantagous to one party or both parties. For example, catalonia (wealthy and culturally and genetically different) vs spain (poor), and north italy vs south italy, and west ukraine vs east ukraine. and the northern states vs the southern states vs the plains states, vs the coastal west (ecotopia). Or canada vs quebec. All of these countries would be better off alone, but the industrial revolution and fiat credit made it difficult for small counteries to engage in defense. Today, a handful of nuclear weapons and an armed populace (switzerland) cna preserve independence (sovereignty) against any and everyone. **Therefore:** Italian = State (government) North italian and South Italian Countries (natural cultural and territorial differences) Italian Culture = Generally referring to language and diet and festivals Italy = a territory ranging from the alps to the tip of the peninsula. Ethnicity = European, vs Germanic vs Greek, vs Mediterranean are Ethnic Groups. Germanic = a prehistoric culture and myth of the home and hearth. Christianity = an old world mythology and literature of politics. Modernity = The enlightenment restoration of our ancient judicial, empirical, stoic and Aristotelian traditions. Three or four races. A handful of subraces. Thirty or so minor subraces. A few hundred super-tribes. Humans are endlessly fascinating. 😉
  • spammer

    spammer


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 03:45:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964707300639432704

    Reply addressees: @TopSocialMedias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964601921494536192


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964601921494536192

  • I dunno. I made fun of them all the time and posted incessantly about it. You sh

    I dunno. I made fun of them all the time and posted incessantly about it.

    You should have been in ukraine in 2014. It was unbelievable.

    This ‘meddling’ is fully intended for their home audiences.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-16 20:37:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964599748777906177

    Reply addressees: @johncardillo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964588768375304192


    IN REPLY TO:

    @johncardillo

    Did we think Russians weren’t trolling us on Twitter?

    Did it really require a special counsel to uncover that?

    If that’s the case, the DOJ, FBI, and IC are bigger messes than we thought.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964588768375304192

  • “Can you have reason without logic, and language without placeholder/tautology?”

    —“Can you have reason without logic, and language without placeholder/tautology?”–Dmitry Chernov We conflate the terms a great deal, but reasoning consists of both wayfinding (via positiva free association ) and what we call ‘logicAL’ operations (via negativa dissassociations) that test constant relations between states. But if we are to avoid conflation, reasoning consists of informal free association and dis-association (dissociation), while the LOGICS consist of formal grammars by which we perform via negativa disassociations by tests (falsifications) of associations (constant relations). A grammar consists of rules (patterns really) of continuous disambiguation. The logics study and catalog subsets of constant relations (dimensions) such as time. When we ask, can we have language without referrents (Names) – well, we are capable of non-liguistic reasoning so yes. And we are capable of sign language. but we must have a grammar in both cases to communicate. And as for ‘natural grammar’ that appears to be nothing more than the same thing neurons do in large numbers: associate and disassociate by a process of continuous disambiguation (category formation) and the recursive differences in state as we ponder it.
  • Does Wittgenstein’s conclusion on the omnipotence paradoxes put an end to them?-

    –Does Wittgenstein’s conclusion on the omnipotence paradoxes put an end to them?— Wittgenstein did not solve the problem that he sought to, Frege thru Kripke and the followers of Turing (meaning Chomsky) did. (a) there exist no paradoxes, only the application of the rules of formal (deflationary) grammars to colloquial (suggestive) and inflationary (fictional) speech. In other words, there exist no paradoxes that are not simply incomplete sentences (transactions). (b) wittgenstein and russell are correct: in the end, the investment in logic has been a waste of time. It’s nothing but tautology. Because we cannot use the logic of constant semantic relations (language) as we do the logic of constant positional relations (mathematics) to produce proofs. And the Intuitionists were correct: We cannot even do so in mathematics. So what the logics allow us to do is falsify statements, but not prove statements.
  • Does Wittgenstein’s conclusion on the omnipotence paradoxes put an end to them?-

    –Does Wittgenstein’s conclusion on the omnipotence paradoxes put an end to them?— Wittgenstein did not solve the problem that he sought to, Frege thru Kripke and the followers of Turing (meaning Chomsky) did. (a) there exist no paradoxes, only the application of the rules of formal (deflationary) grammars to colloquial (suggestive) and inflationary (fictional) speech. In other words, there exist no paradoxes that are not simply incomplete sentences (transactions). (b) wittgenstein and russell are correct: in the end, the investment in logic has been a waste of time. It’s nothing but tautology. Because we cannot use the logic of constant semantic relations (language) as we do the logic of constant positional relations (mathematics) to produce proofs. And the Intuitionists were correct: We cannot even do so in mathematics. So what the logics allow us to do is falsify statements, but not prove statements.
  • Wittgenstein’s conclusion on the omnipotence paradoxes put an end to them?— Wi

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence_paradox#Language_and_omnipotence–Does Wittgenstein’s conclusion on the omnipotence paradoxes put an end to them?—

    Wittgenstein did not solve the problem that he sought to, Frege thru Kripke and the followers of Turing (meaning Chomsky) did.

    (a) there exist no paradoxes, only the application of the rules of formal (deflationary) grammars to colloquial (suggestive) and inflationary (fictional) speech. In other words, there exist no paradoxes that are not simply incomplete sentences (transactions).

    (b) wittgenstein and russell are correct: in the end, the investment in logic has been a waste of time. It’s nothing but tautology. Because we cannot use the logic of constant semantic relations (language) as we do the logic of constant positional relations (mathematics) to produce proofs. And the Intuitionists were correct: We cannot even do so in mathematics. So what the logics allow us to do is falsify statements, but not prove statements.Updated Feb 16, 2018, 1:28 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-16 01:28:00 UTC