Curt Doolittle

Form: Reply

  • Candice Mary: Do you want to post about your thoughts on reciprocity? It’s extre

    Candice Mary: Do you want to post about your thoughts on reciprocity?

    It’s extremely helpful to put those thoughts out in public and see what you can learn through debate with others.

    (If not, then apologies. Just trying to be encouraging.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-24 08:48:00 UTC

  • The work’s been done. Trying to remember…. Um…. intergeneration cost of a si

    The work’s been done. Trying to remember…. Um…. intergeneration cost of a single criminal reproducing. If I remember the most cited case is a woman whose offspring over three or four generations cause an unbelievable amount of damage.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-24 01:17:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999459361805266945

    Reply addressees: @TheBurkeanOak

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999442054760480770

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999442054760480770

  • Um, Underclass Reproduction Is Oppression of The Entire Polity.

    —“The classes were not oppressed, but domesticated through the use of organized violence, manorialism, and religion to cull sufficient numbers from the population that only those not a drag on the rest of humanity remained.”—Curt Doolittle —“Um since when does this so-called “domestication” not count as oppression?”—Ian Heckman, PhD student in philosophy. I think most of us call it ‘the minimum eugenics necessary to insure the median agency of the population exceeds the median demands of competitive survival’. I mean, evidence is evidence: The single best investment people can make in developing a high trust polity with a standard of living above the malthusian limit is to cull the underclasses as aggressively as possible. So by any and every measure, underclass reproduction oppresses the entirety of the polity and keeps them in violence, low trust, poverty, and disease. It’s my job to state the truth. It’s up to other people what they do with it. —NOTE TO CLARIFY— —“the mean value the third generation of children are regressing to is the mean of their respective families”—Jayman You don’t regress to the mean of the population but to the mean of your respective families. Due to sortition, populations (which are collections of families) tend to regress to the mean of the collection of families. https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2015/10/21/regression-to-the-mean/
    May 23, 2018 11:45am

  • Um, Underclass Reproduction Is Oppression of The Entire Polity.

    —“The classes were not oppressed, but domesticated through the use of organized violence, manorialism, and religion to cull sufficient numbers from the population that only those not a drag on the rest of humanity remained.”—Curt Doolittle —“Um since when does this so-called “domestication” not count as oppression?”—Ian Heckman, PhD student in philosophy. I think most of us call it ‘the minimum eugenics necessary to insure the median agency of the population exceeds the median demands of competitive survival’. I mean, evidence is evidence: The single best investment people can make in developing a high trust polity with a standard of living above the malthusian limit is to cull the underclasses as aggressively as possible. So by any and every measure, underclass reproduction oppresses the entirety of the polity and keeps them in violence, low trust, poverty, and disease. It’s my job to state the truth. It’s up to other people what they do with it. —NOTE TO CLARIFY— —“the mean value the third generation of children are regressing to is the mean of their respective families”—Jayman You don’t regress to the mean of the population but to the mean of your respective families. Due to sortition, populations (which are collections of families) tend to regress to the mean of the collection of families. https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2015/10/21/regression-to-the-mean/
    May 23, 2018 11:45am

  • –“curt What Do You Make of High Iq White Male New Englanders Voting Blue?”–

    —“Curt what do you make of high IQ white male New Englanders voting blue? I’ve heard you argue it’s signaling for status but is it reducible entirely to that?”—Tim Spillane It’s actually pretty simple: Connecticut: Yale, Trinity, Wesleyan, Fairfield County (Essentially Long island in ct), dead-manufacturing( old GM, current United Technologies.) Irish, Italian, puerto rican. Massachusetts: Harvard, MIT, Boston College (Women outnumber men in Boston 5 to 7. Irish Catholic, Italian, / Unions. New York: Columbia, NYU, Arts, Advertising, Marketing, (Women outnumber men). IN GENERAL: Puritanical Value System = Virtue Signaling. Vermont is French Catholic – french immigrants were ALL underclass, while British immigrants were biased middle class. Which is the causal relationship between protestantism and catholicism. May 23, 2018 11:49am

  • –“curt What Do You Make of High Iq White Male New Englanders Voting Blue?”–

    —“Curt what do you make of high IQ white male New Englanders voting blue? I’ve heard you argue it’s signaling for status but is it reducible entirely to that?”—Tim Spillane It’s actually pretty simple: Connecticut: Yale, Trinity, Wesleyan, Fairfield County (Essentially Long island in ct), dead-manufacturing( old GM, current United Technologies.) Irish, Italian, puerto rican. Massachusetts: Harvard, MIT, Boston College (Women outnumber men in Boston 5 to 7. Irish Catholic, Italian, / Unions. New York: Columbia, NYU, Arts, Advertising, Marketing, (Women outnumber men). IN GENERAL: Puritanical Value System = Virtue Signaling. Vermont is French Catholic – french immigrants were ALL underclass, while British immigrants were biased middle class. Which is the causal relationship between protestantism and catholicism. May 23, 2018 11:49am

  • At Some Point the Middle Class Seeks Profit at The Expense of The Nation

    —“So in examples where civilization does effectively vet and cull the underclass, how before long the golden age, and how long before the descendants destroy what their ancestors built? Can they do it on their own or do they always import/strengthen an underclass?”—A Friend ^Exactly the problem. That’s right. At some point The middle class seeks profit at the expense of the nation (polity, or genetic distribution). National Socialism was an attempt to change this – unfortunately it was stated in german prose rather than english and as such moral rather than scientific – and that curse has harmed national socialism ever since. So the problem is constraint of the middle class just as much as constraint of the upper class and the underclass – which is only possible with full accounting under the natural law of reciprocity. We never wrote a ‘bible’ of natural law. And it’s time we did. 😉

  • I cannot believe you spam my feed with “Impose God On Everyone!!!”. Sorry but th

    I cannot believe you spam my feed with “Impose God On Everyone!!!”. Sorry but that’s not scientific, it’s not calculable, and it’s contrary to the evidence.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-23 20:39:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999389444447854594

    Reply addressees: @MinimumSt8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999385186692452352

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999385186692452352

  • DON”T SPAM MY FEED WITH THEOLOGICAL AUTHORITARIANISM

    DON”T SPAM MY FEED WITH THEOLOGICAL AUTHORITARIANISM.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-23 20:32:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999387733125664768

    Reply addressees: @MinimumSt8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999385186692452352

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999385186692452352

  • PILPUL IS AS EASILY IDENTIFIABLE AS ITS NEGATIVE: CRITIQUE —“I am somewhat cur

    PILPUL IS AS EASILY IDENTIFIABLE AS ITS NEGATIVE: CRITIQUE

    —“I am somewhat curious as to why you blocked me from your timeline. …… You do come across as an intellectual, being an educated philosopher, I am just very surprised that an intellectual would have such a disdain for a fluid free flow of dialogue even if it does come from a position that might make some of your followers feel moderately uncomfortable. The greatest ideas of the intellectual heros throughout history were allowed to flourish due to at least somewhat of a tolerance towards dissenting views and novel ideas.”— Banned Pilpul Practitioner.

    It’s because (a) sarcasm, (b) pilpul. Specialize in truth, within truth in grammars, with grammars of the art of lying.

    Now you were raised in the culture that (a) invented poly moralism, (b) never succeeded at developing agrarian ethics, and (c) practiced pillpul to employ those polymoral ethics.

    But your method of argument (pilpul) is just as recognizable to me (and my followers) as is christian or muslim argument.

    So it’s simply that as a practitioner and teacher of truthful speech, I practiced what I teach, and that is, the punishment and suppression of ‘lying’, by the use of pilpul.

    It’s not complicated. You may not even be aware that you’re lying you just equate that form of lying with ‘reasonableness’. But I know (and we know) better: it’s an attempt to advertise ingroup morality while practicing ougroup immorality.

    I don’t support ‘free speech’ at all. I only support free ‘truthful speech’. And I expose and ostracize the rest.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-23 15:45:00 UTC