Form: Reply

  • True

    True.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 00:13:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012489111544975366

    Reply addressees: @AffirmativRight

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012488746112086016


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012488746112086016

  • “Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project?

    —“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark  Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution. The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory. The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book. This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law. What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure. And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected… The clock ticks, the world turns, the window opens, anger burns.

  • “Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project?

    —“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark  Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution. The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory. The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book. This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law. What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure. And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected… The clock ticks, the world turns, the window opens, anger burns.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Curt does your book include a new constit

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark

    Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution.

    The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory.

    The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book.

    This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law.

    What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure.

    And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected…

    The clock ticks,
    the world turns,
    the window opens,
    anger burns.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 13:56:23 UTC

  • “Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project?

    —“Curt does your book include a new constitution, or is that a separate project? (With recent political events, leftists intensifying harassment, etc, I’m thinking we might need one sooner rather than later.)”—John Mark

    Last summer I had to break the book apart because it was too big. And so I have two books, one shorter that is targeted to reforming libertarianism, and one much much longer targeted to revolution and constitution.

    The first and shorter book is more technical, and the longer book more explanatory.

    The other reason being that I had to burn a long time on the Grammars and I felt that I could now get the shorter book out ‘shortly’ and then take the technical component and move it into the larger book.

    This means that the two books have similar technical content, but the larger book ignores ‘temporal’ issues (liberty, freedom, libertarianism), and contains entirely the new law.

    What I *can* say is that I have definitely gotten to the point where I can explain everything to a freshman college student. Which I never thought would happen. Whether the book is as understandable as I can manage in a class environment I’m not sure.

    And there is a certain virtue to timing. The Overton window for revolution has to be open to get maximum effect. Although we are certainly getting there as I expected…

    The clock ticks,

    the world turns,

    the window opens,

    anger burns.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 09:56:00 UTC

  • I dunno where you get that from but the assault ban’s wont hold. The rest would

    I dunno where you get that from but the assault ban’s wont hold. The rest would never even come up. These aren’t something the court will consider because it’s not a federal matter. Which is what’s different about a right wing court: states for social policy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 02:02:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012154348070146048

    Reply addressees: @nikobowie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012063118384619526


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012063118384619526

  • The court will not reverse itself for the simple reason that marriage difference

    The court will not reverse itself for the simple reason that marriage differences would inhibit mobility between states, and this is something that the court will never do. They cannot reverse it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 01:51:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012151422685728769

    Reply addressees: @RedwoodGirl

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012150922481360897


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RedwoodGirl

    @curtdoolittle If the court rules that same-sex marriage is illegal, that circumvents the state legislatures that have passed same-sex marriage laws.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012150922481360897

  • The court has said that the ONLY reason roe v wade was a mistake is that it shou

    The court has said that the ONLY reason roe v wade was a mistake is that it should have been left to the states. But (a) they will not reverse it, (b) even if they did, they would only return it to the states. They will not COMPOUND what they consider their greatest mistake.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 01:50:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012151245849726976

    Reply addressees: @RedwoodGirl

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012150784283144192


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RedwoodGirl

    @curtdoolittle How do you figure? If the court rules that fetuses have due process rights and abortion denies them those rights, abortion becomes illegal everywhere. That will circumvent the state legislatures that have passed abortion rights laws.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012150784283144192

  • It’s done. Get over it. You have state law, federal law, and the amendment proce

    It’s done. Get over it. You have state law, federal law, and the amendment process, but the use of the courts to circumvent the legislatures is done.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 01:45:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012149961440612357

    Reply addressees: @ScoopReportnews

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012149518341681152


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ScoopReportnews

    ‘IT’S TIME FOR DEMOCRATS TO PLAY HARDBALL’: TV host Chris Matthews urges Democrats to resist Mitch McConnell after Justice Kennedy announces retirement https://t.co/S2QQqu4y9k

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012149518341681152

  • It’s done. Get over it. You have state law, federal law, and the amendment proce

    It’s done. Get over it. You have state law, federal law, and the amendment process, but the use of the courts to circumvent the legislatures is done.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 01:45:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012149845602250752

    Reply addressees: @CKakaMissy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012149541167161345


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012149541167161345