pls Vet for me?
https://www.facebook.com/husainn
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 18:13:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017472020672647169
Form: Reply
-
pls Vet for me?
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE MEANING OF “EDUCATION ASSOCIATED GENES” –
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
THE MEANING OF “EDUCATION ASSOCIATED GENES”
—âEducation-associated genesâ? Iâm a bit skeptical that such are really verified.”—Rich Berger
It’s just a politically correct term for the 1000+ IQ correlated genes that have been discovered as yet. Most public estimations of IQ are done by degrees (a very bad proxy by the way), and by framing education related genes rather than IQ they circumvent criticism by the anti-IQ-measurement groups.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 17:12:38 UTC
-
I’m happy if you want to discuss which dependency is first: what it is we can sa
I’m happy if you want to discuss which dependency is first: what it is we can say we speak of and what it is we claim exists using our speech. 😉 In case you don’t grok that, it inverts your presupposition. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:52:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017451652088061953
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017394341617324032
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017394341617324032
-
No I’m saying truth is parsimonious and knowledge (wisdom) and truth (parsimony)
No I’m saying truth is parsimonious and knowledge (wisdom) and truth (parsimony) are different things. How we cast the term ‘knowledge’ as ‘truthful’ or not requires agreement on terms,
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:51:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017451359464017921
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017393358795431937
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017393358795431937
-
Adam. How many people know you well enough to understand your journey over the p
Adam. How many people know you well enough to understand your journey over the past twenty years? I mean. I’ve known you since maybe… 2010 at most? No one can accuse you ever of having a fixed perspective, or not experimenting with what life has to offer. I mean. damn. You’ve sort of explored it all. And that’s what makes your observations so interesting.
(To Adam’s friends: I love this man, and he has a depth of character that I’m envious of.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 15:11:00 UTC
-
5) non-temporality (non-time), self organization via entropy, and inter-universe
5) non-temporality (non-time), self organization via entropy, and inter-universe sinusoidal equilibration (the ‘bubble’ universe), requires nothing other than itself. There is no meaning of time outside of such a bubble.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 13:30:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017400825432461314
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
-
4) Your proposition is that fictionalism is different from lying – which it cann
4) Your proposition is that fictionalism is different from lying – which it cannot be: you are fabricating information that is not there. The information is either present in reality or you are fabricating it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 13:30:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017400786530242560
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
-
3) I can testify to my proposition that all these phenomenon either to exist or
3) I can testify to my proposition that all these phenomenon either to exist or can exist, without anything other than an energetic substance seeking an impossible equilibrium. (a pattern which we see throughout the natural world).
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 13:30:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017400752438996997
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
-
2) I framed the criteria for decidability as (a) parsimony (b) constant relation
2) I framed the criteria for decidability as (a) parsimony (b) constant relations between existence, perception, cognition, and action, (c) motive, (d) absence of fictionalism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 13:30:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017400711750062080
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
-
1) I framed the problem as whether you can testify. You cannot. Since you cannot
1) I framed the problem as whether you can testify. You cannot. Since you cannot testify, you are in fact fictionalizing (adding information that does not exist).
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 13:29:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017400578450903040
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017382157776510977