Form: Reply

  • RT @AnnCoulter: Hey, patriots! Don’t let the Elevator Yellers control the field.

    RT @AnnCoulter: Hey, patriots! Don’t let the Elevator Yellers control the field. Call (202) 224-3121 and demand that the senate confirm Ka…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 17:55:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047183222516469761

  • exactly. 😉

    exactly. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 16:07:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047156149248806912

    Reply addressees: @dagmar_schmitt @AuthorityDAD @POTUS @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047148026773590017


    IN REPLY TO:

    @GudistGrug

    @AuthorityDAD @curtdoolittle @POTUS @realDonaldTrump A US civil war is a world civil war, or rather a war for civilization.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047148026773590017

  • —“Q: Revolution: What about the effect on the global hegemony?”—

    —“If your goals are realized in the US, what (do you believe) would be the effect on global hegemony? Is this speculation worthwhile?”— Yest the speculation is worthwhile because external effect is part of the desired outcome. Lets assume one of four initial reactions: 1 – External actors will become more confident in world affairs and more critical of US activity in the world. 2 – external actors will support the activity of activists 3 – external actors will seize opportunities for political expansion of influence. 4 – external actors will seize opportunities for military expansion of influence. The degree of change in the world will be dependent upon those actions and the outcome of a revolutionary change: 1 – acquiescence by the state and restoration of the powers of the states. 2 – continuing declining low level civil warfare and related economic decline 3 – a significant uprising that forces the military to enact martial law . 4 – a significant uprising that forces the military to call troops from abroad to american soil. By and large the balance of powers will be restored,and either way america will return to a domestic rather than imperial power. Since everyone KNOWS this, particularly the upper levels of the military, the objective (my objective) is to make revolutionary outcome so certain that the government merely meets our demands for devolution to the states. It is pretty hard to object to my proposal other than out of job defense or collusion with the world’s (((globalist))) movement. We will own the blue water navy for a long time to come. We will lose and want to lose our responsibility for defending europe. That will force germany and russia to work together and end our conflict. China much like russia operates entirely for its domestic market. The usa operates for its globalist market. we just need to restore the balance of powers and then we can all focus on the only remaining enemy to the world: judaism-islam.

  • —“Q: Revolution: What about the effect on the global hegemony?”—

    —“If your goals are realized in the US, what (do you believe) would be the effect on global hegemony? Is this speculation worthwhile?”— Yest the speculation is worthwhile because external effect is part of the desired outcome. Lets assume one of four initial reactions: 1 – External actors will become more confident in world affairs and more critical of US activity in the world. 2 – external actors will support the activity of activists 3 – external actors will seize opportunities for political expansion of influence. 4 – external actors will seize opportunities for military expansion of influence. The degree of change in the world will be dependent upon those actions and the outcome of a revolutionary change: 1 – acquiescence by the state and restoration of the powers of the states. 2 – continuing declining low level civil warfare and related economic decline 3 – a significant uprising that forces the military to enact martial law . 4 – a significant uprising that forces the military to call troops from abroad to american soil. By and large the balance of powers will be restored,and either way america will return to a domestic rather than imperial power. Since everyone KNOWS this, particularly the upper levels of the military, the objective (my objective) is to make revolutionary outcome so certain that the government merely meets our demands for devolution to the states. It is pretty hard to object to my proposal other than out of job defense or collusion with the world’s (((globalist))) movement. We will own the blue water navy for a long time to come. We will lose and want to lose our responsibility for defending europe. That will force germany and russia to work together and end our conflict. China much like russia operates entirely for its domestic market. The usa operates for its globalist market. we just need to restore the balance of powers and then we can all focus on the only remaining enemy to the world: judaism-islam.

  • are you off your meds again? just sayin’

    are you off your meds again? just sayin’.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 03:57:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046972293505798145

    Reply addressees: @stevemakastevem @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046963269557211136


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046963269557211136

  • Just because people are much smarter than you are and operate in different frame

    Just because people are much smarter than you are and operate in different frames of reference doesn’t mean any such thing. It means only that you fail to grasp the contracts for reciprocity that they are trading as they speak with one another.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 02:57:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046957391168905221

    Reply addressees: @stevemakastevem @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046949598915432452


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046949598915432452

  • You say that like its a bad thing?

    You say that like its a bad thing?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 02:20:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046947885487677440

    Reply addressees: @stevemakastevem @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046782125293408256


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046782125293408256

  • That’s actually the answer

    That’s actually the answer


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 00:43:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046923498340438017

    Reply addressees: @BobKlapetzky @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046883366467973121


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046883366467973121

  • Yep

    Yep.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-01 22:21:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046887761343594497

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046773944672346114


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046773944672346114

  • Steven, Measuring Violence Deltas doesn’t help us as much as measuring theft. Wi

    Steven, Measuring Violence Deltas doesn’t help us as much as measuring theft. With material goods replaced by title to fractional goods, we have simply devalued violence and increased the value of cunning, deceit, fraud, and conspiracy. Those men lived in a very different world.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-01 22:15:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046886393006493696

    Reply addressees: @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046619253779107841


    IN REPLY TO:

    @sapinker

    It used to be worse: Between 1830 and 1860, there were 70 violent brawls between congressmen. https://t.co/rwTqICDTQt

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046619253779107841