Curt Doolittle

Form: Reply

  • Then state (summarize) your criticism, and we will walk thru it. Because that’s

    Then state (summarize) your criticism, and we will walk thru it. Because that’s all i could find in your video.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 20:41:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055560094577033217

    Reply addressees: @PhilosophyCuck @MrKennan1948 @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Jonas_Ceika

    @MrKennan1948 @curtdoolittle @WorMartiN The language is very familiar to me. What confuses me is the fact that it’s completely detached from any of my criticisms on the topic.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055556675585875968

  • Of course it is. Which was Mao’s objective: to prevent separation of the north a

    Of course it is. Which was Mao’s objective: to prevent separation of the north and south and the devolution of the chinese empire into states. That doesn’t explain why china is circumventing Bretton Woods, and exerting power over shipping lanes when the USA pays for it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 19:07:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055536264995393536

    Reply addressees: @catoletters @amconmag

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535572599504896

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535572599504896

  • Thanks. I’m supposed to interview him about his book soon, and I don’t follow th

    Thanks. I’m supposed to interview him about his book soon, and I don’t follow the ‘gossip columns’ so to speak. I’ll just avoid the subject and stick with the book.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 19:05:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535840208846850

    Reply addressees: @Caine60724874 @ChrisNahr

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055534411880583168

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055534411880583168

  • I dunno. Because most of my followers are young

    I dunno. Because most of my followers are young.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 19:04:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535539682729984

    Reply addressees: @khunter495

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535056482000896

    IN REPLY TO:

    @SumofAction

    @curtdoolittle Wondering why they seem to make a judgement that far right is older, when I see the true extreme right as a much younger mix of people.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055535056482000896

  • Someone wanna clue me in? Was it the divorce?

    Someone wanna clue me in? Was it the divorce?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 18:57:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055533781917032448

    Reply addressees: @ChrisNahr

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055197731256446976

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055197731256446976

  • Jewish vs White

    Jewish vs White

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 18:55:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055533365888200706

    Reply addressees: @cursedsalad @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055495518892154881

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055495518892154881

  • Explaining Reciprocity to A Newb

    October 25th, 2018 8:27 AM EXPLAINING RECIPROCITY TO A NEWB

    —“…If I see someone being raped, but do nothing to help….”—

    [T]hen by law, “You failed to remove the bad”. Incremental Suppression: the discovery and canonization of ‘bads’ (violations of reciprocity) by use of the one law of reciprocity (tort), the jury, and an independent professional judiciary, provides the most rapid means possible of continuous incremental suppressions of free riding, parasitism, and predation The Natural Law of Reciprocity: the demand for Productive, Fully Informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests (property), Free of Imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated Interests (property) of others by externality. Remove the bad: Every man a warrior, sheriff, juror, legislator of the one natural law of reciprocity. |WESTERN CIVILIZATION| Transcendence (Evolutionary Velocity) via Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The judiciary of the natural law, and the consequential markets in everything. Where there the militia constitutions a private partnership and there is no state to perform the function of insurer of last resort, every man demonstrates reciprocity by performing the function of insurer of last resort. —“You’re conflating “good””— Anything that is not bad is good. Bads can be known. The preferential, the good (reciprocal preferential), are preferences. Whether they are preference or good is an opinion. Whether they are ‘bad’ and a violation of reciprocity is not an opinion. It is a fact (by Logical Necessity). —“Sacrifices”– No animal, including humans, demonstrates altruism, only kin selection, option buying, status acquisition (opportunity gain and discount), and reciprocity (debt) payment against status loss (and therefore opportunity loss). We cast this self interest as virtuous in order to acquire more of such behavior by grant of status to heroic display. —“…being good…”— Man is, by all evidence, amoral – preying upon or cooperating with as suits his self interest. Given a long time frame, it is in one’s self interest to cooperate because of the outsized returns on cooperation versus predation and boycott. One is ‘virtuous’ because all ‘virtues’ decrease the opportunity costs of cooperation and provide discounts on those higher returns. The fact that we attribute status (pay for with opportunity discounts [trust, recommendation, referrals], is merely compensation (investment) in the production of reciprocity by those with most evidence of it. QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job. 😉 lol

  • Explaining Reciprocity to A Newb

    October 25th, 2018 8:27 AM EXPLAINING RECIPROCITY TO A NEWB

    —“…If I see someone being raped, but do nothing to help….”—

    [T]hen by law, “You failed to remove the bad”. Incremental Suppression: the discovery and canonization of ‘bads’ (violations of reciprocity) by use of the one law of reciprocity (tort), the jury, and an independent professional judiciary, provides the most rapid means possible of continuous incremental suppressions of free riding, parasitism, and predation The Natural Law of Reciprocity: the demand for Productive, Fully Informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests (property), Free of Imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated Interests (property) of others by externality. Remove the bad: Every man a warrior, sheriff, juror, legislator of the one natural law of reciprocity. |WESTERN CIVILIZATION| Transcendence (Evolutionary Velocity) via Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The judiciary of the natural law, and the consequential markets in everything. Where there the militia constitutions a private partnership and there is no state to perform the function of insurer of last resort, every man demonstrates reciprocity by performing the function of insurer of last resort. —“You’re conflating “good””— Anything that is not bad is good. Bads can be known. The preferential, the good (reciprocal preferential), are preferences. Whether they are preference or good is an opinion. Whether they are ‘bad’ and a violation of reciprocity is not an opinion. It is a fact (by Logical Necessity). —“Sacrifices”– No animal, including humans, demonstrates altruism, only kin selection, option buying, status acquisition (opportunity gain and discount), and reciprocity (debt) payment against status loss (and therefore opportunity loss). We cast this self interest as virtuous in order to acquire more of such behavior by grant of status to heroic display. —“…being good…”— Man is, by all evidence, amoral – preying upon or cooperating with as suits his self interest. Given a long time frame, it is in one’s self interest to cooperate because of the outsized returns on cooperation versus predation and boycott. One is ‘virtuous’ because all ‘virtues’ decrease the opportunity costs of cooperation and provide discounts on those higher returns. The fact that we attribute status (pay for with opportunity discounts [trust, recommendation, referrals], is merely compensation (investment) in the production of reciprocity by those with most evidence of it. QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job. 😉 lol

  • ” The real grudge against Spencer stems from his first playing the leader in var

    —” The real grudge against Spencer stems from his first playing the leader in various alt-right endeavors, then invariably failing them.”— Twitter

    Thanks. Just to counter any misinterpretation of my side: (a) I am not a fan of crucifying leaders. (b) the first generation of leaders (like any technology) are always replaced, (c) The MARKET FOR LEADERSHIP will produce what’s needed. (or not) Heroes try, and many die, so other heroes may succeed.

    (And people who sit at home while others fight have no voice worth listening to.)

    Conservatives eat their failed generals, while liberals give them a bath and a vacation and send them into battle again. I prefer the other side’s method.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 17:51:00 UTC

  • Wait? Do You mean the daily barrage of anti western, anti-white, anti-male propa

    Wait? Do You mean the daily barrage of anti western, anti-white, anti-male propaganda out of The Post and the Mainstream Press, Academy, and Left Party?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 16:48:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055501302644572161

    Reply addressees: @washingtonpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055500994367418369

    IN REPLY TO:

    @washingtonpost

    Perspective: The connection between hateful rhetoric and terrorizing acts is glaringly obvious, but some refuse to see it https://t.co/Z7OeGyP82r

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1055500994367418369