Form: Reply

GETTING THESE IDEAS INTO A FORMAT FOR NORMIES

—“I’m just trying to get your ideas into a format that registers on a level with normal people aside from some superficial respect for scientific sounding words and phrases but instead upon a deeper spiritual and emotional level.”—- Christian Kalafut

I understand.

I cannot reduce logic of this depth to comforting analogy when it it precisely the use of comforting analogy for the purpose of deception that I have constructed it for.

Normal people are not capable of calculus, economics, programming, law, or formal logic. They are merely the BENEFICIARIES of it when used by those of us who can.

If you merely explain that it is possible to use the law to prohibit the financial sector, the media, politicians and the academy from taking advantage of them by lying to them, and that Propertarianism provides a method of writing the law in order to make that possible, they will understand.

Because the work consists largely of:

(a) a single value-independent language of logic, science, ethics, politics, economics, and law.

(b) a set of criteria for testing whether or not statements made in that language (which is very close to law already) is false (such that it may still be true but it is not false or dependent upon pretense of knowledge).

(c) that we can add this to the constitution and the courts fairly easily. And in doing so allow us to continue market support of what we favor, and court suppression of falsehoods that we don’t.

(d) and if we do this most of the ‘redistributive demands’ can be made possible by disempowering of the financial, academy, media, and state sector, so that those proceeds can instead by consumed by the people (citizens),

(e) so that once again it is possible to bear and rase a family on one income, pay for one’s house, and then save for retirement for the vast majority of the laboring, working, middle, and upper middle classes.

That’s it.

That’s what they have to understand.

The rest of it is just the technical means of constructing, debating, writing, administering, and judging the law such that all of that is possible.

It would be as great a return as the scientific revolution. Because the vast majority of the problem ordinary people face today is that the systems by which they are defrauded are so complicated that it takes people like you can I to explain it to them – and why they suffer from it.

This is very profound program. It is larger than marxism, and completes the scientific revolution by producing a logic and science of the social sciences, an an institutional means of suppressing the conquest of our civilization by deception, using marxism, postmodernism, feminism and the organized institution of deception by the state, academy, media, financial sector.

That’s alll people need to know. They do not need to know calculus, only have a vague understanding of how statistics can be used.

They do not need to undrestand propertarianism (whether you call it natural law, or the law of information).

They just need to understand that these tools help us restore our civilization to civility.

So, as a reminder:

Again, there exists both EDUCATION (meaning via positiva) and DECIDABILITY(Science via negativa) I do the latter so that others may better teach the former.

I don’t do RELIGION (Demand for Supernatural Authoritarian Conformity) or PHILOSOPHY (Persuasive Moral Sophistry).

I do Law, Science, and Logic. (Decidability).

And one day I hope either I or others will do EDUCATION.

ps: ( My preference all along, and our strategy all along, has been that I do the theory others do the education, becuase frankly the difference between me and my frame of understanding and that of normies is that of a difference in species. I can’t empathize or sympathize well enough to do their storytelling.)

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev Ukraine.