Form: Reply

  • Short Course: Does Might Make Right (or Rights)?

    –“DOES MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”–

    —“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right? Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend

    “Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.” propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/ Might makes rights. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/ “Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs: A Declaration” propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/ “Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud” propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/ “The Virtue Of Violence” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/ “The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence” propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/ “Liberty And Violence” propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/ “Violence Is A Beautiful Word” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/

  • “CURT: PLEASE DEFINE ‘DEFLATIONARY GRAMMAR’?”– Search and ye shall find: proper

    –“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE ‘DEFLATIONARY GRAMMAR’?”– Search and ye shall find:  propertarianism.com/2018/03/16/11386/

  • Short Course: Does Might Make Right (or Rights)?

    –“DOES MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”–

    —“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right? Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend

    “Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.” propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/ Might makes rights. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/ “Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs: A Declaration” propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/ “Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud” propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/ “The Virtue Of Violence” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/ “The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence” propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/ “Liberty And Violence” propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/ “Violence Is A Beautiful Word” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/

  • Return to Our Primary Industry: Domestication

    —“The Left is not attempting to win the debate. It is simply not the practical goal within the current political system. It is trying to persuade the electorate, the masses. And the Left is very efficient in the game of persuasion, which is mostly about playing the emotions of the crowd – which is mostly not rational, but is driven by irrational fears and desires. Your approach, as impeccable as it may be, is far less efficient for the given purpose.”— Igor Rogov

    Correct. ergo: civil war. law. force – return to the method by which the women, the peasantry and priesthood are ruled if for no other reason than our self defense. And so we can once again profit from the domestication of the animal man. It is the most profitable industry at all. There is no reason we should have or should ever, abandon it. Domesticate animals, then plants, then men, then nature, then planets, then the universe.

  • Return to Our Primary Industry: Domestication

    —“The Left is not attempting to win the debate. It is simply not the practical goal within the current political system. It is trying to persuade the electorate, the masses. And the Left is very efficient in the game of persuasion, which is mostly about playing the emotions of the crowd – which is mostly not rational, but is driven by irrational fears and desires. Your approach, as impeccable as it may be, is far less efficient for the given purpose.”— Igor Rogov

    Correct. ergo: civil war. law. force – return to the method by which the women, the peasantry and priesthood are ruled if for no other reason than our self defense. And so we can once again profit from the domestication of the animal man. It is the most profitable industry at all. There is no reason we should have or should ever, abandon it. Domesticate animals, then plants, then men, then nature, then planets, then the universe.

  • “Curt needs to read [ insert here ]”

    —“CURT NEEDS TO READ [INSERT NOVELS, ESSAYS HERE].”—

    Sci Fi? I read Herbert (Both Dune, and the White Plague – which I bet you haven’t) and Heinlein, and Clarke, and Asimov, and Bova and Ellison, and Bear, Anderson, and Pohl, and NIven, and Lem and Crichton, and Lem, and Forward, and Weber, and Saberhagen, and Steakley, and le Guin and Moorcock, and Lieber, Ballard and del Ray, and Stephenson and Sterling and and Gibson and Dick, and the Anthologies, and subscribed to Galaxy, and Isaac Asimov’s Science FIction, and Creepy, Eerie, Epic, 1984, Heavy Metal Magazines, and everything in the Splatterpunk Movement, saw 2001, silent running, star wars, alien, aliens, blade runner and dune in the theaters on first run. And I played the (and wrote) the first generations of video console games, computer games, and had a Z80, a commodore 64/128, a tandy color computer (still my favorite), a heavy-to-carry compaq portable computer, an IBM PC (Original). I played Wizardry when it came out, the Bard’s Tale, Doom, Quake, Unreal, and Counter-Strike. I didn’t even touch Horror and Mystery, or Military FIction, or Spy novels in that list. I also read pretty much everything in the top 100 books of literature, the majority of the Great Books Series, (in hardcover), every encyclopedia (Britannica is best), Roget’s thesaurus, multiple dictionaries, history, science, most everything ever written in and on artificial intelligence, software design, programming, and only began to look at philosophy through the philosophy of science (popper and kuhn) which led me to Hayek, and economics, and that combination was ‘the key’ to my understanding ‘what had gone wrong’ in intellectual history during the 20th century. I only read philosophy to falsify it. My Recommended Reading List contains books and papers I have read. But only a FRACTION of them. Even today I sift through volumes of information (Mostly papers) and the odd book (almost all books in the sciences are as predictable now, as are books of fiction), as well as produce thousands of words of output myself. I process information. Yeah. I’m THAT GUY with six books under his arm, reading at every possible moment, that thinks every other person is a fucking moron, and barely domesticated (dangerous) animal (zombie, or what we call an NPC now), and that teachers and professors largely fill the function of keeping them in a corral we call the class room, and few are worth the air they breathe. The difference is I was in fights on a regular basis, back when things were ‘what boys do’ – particularly in farm towns. I am, to my knowledge, other than what I learned in art theory, self educated – entirely. School, university, library, bookstore, and the internet are simply nice places to consume information without worrying about the peasantry doing something too stupid. Unfortunately, the optimum means of protecting yourself from Zombies is to run a business, accumulate capital and revenue streams, and surround yourself with humans. This is the problem for my ‘kin’. They are not allowed to create voluntary disassociation to protect themselves from the zombies. and so unless they can earn enough money to do so they are exposed to the zombies and cannot create safe spaces we call ‘neighborhoods’ and ‘civil society’.

  • “Have you read Robert D. Kaplan’s “warrior politics” legitimizing the doctrine o

    —“Have you read Robert D. Kaplan’s “warrior politics” legitimizing the doctrine of preemptive strikes….?”—

    Legitimacy is a nonsense word. It means precisely nothing. The application of military violence is not a moral but practical question. We tell weak women and men it is moral – to quiet their inner child.

    As I posted earlier, both Sun Tzu, and Machiavelli wrote treatise to re-educate us to be hunters and warriors once we have fallen under the ‘moral spell’ of urban life.

    I read most of Kaplan’s writings, but this one was unnecessary. It’s obvious. An attempt to educate the overly domesticated polity no longer capable of rational choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 16:52:00 UTC

  • MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”– —“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might do

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/–“DOES MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”–

    —“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right?

    Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend

    “Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.”

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/

    “Might makes rights.”

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/

    “Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs – A Declaration”

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/

    “Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud”

    https://propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/

    “The Virtue Of Violence”

    https://propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/

    “The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence”

    https://propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/

    “Liberty And Violence”

    https://propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/

    “Violence Is A Beautiful Word”

    https://propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 16:48:00 UTC

  • Since I work with what is unique about the west, and am fairly hostile to easter

    Since I work with what is unique about the west, and am fairly hostile to eastern mysticisms of all kinds, I prefer to stick with european history. The vast difference between european religion’s tech, magic, tendency to historicize, and tendency to sacrifice ritualize is ours.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 07:30:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058622437934448640

    Reply addressees: @JSp46305240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058614695874179073


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058614695874179073

  • It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind,

    It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So,he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 01:01:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058524542883246080

    Reply addressees: @Ron_Renaud

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058523094187495425


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058523094187495425