Form: Reply

  • I”m English (anglo american) though genetically there is no difference between n

    I”m English (anglo american) though genetically there is no difference between northern France (normandy) and southern England, and little difference between them and Belgium, the Low Countries, and Denmark.

    While raised by a Breton French Catholic mother, and an english protestant father, given the family traditions, I am pretty much a Church of England protestant new England American descendent of puritans and the English middle and upper middle classes.

    I’m also an arrogant elitist snob, but at least I seek to help the little people and save them from the enemy. πŸ˜‰

    Reply addressees: @finishedyet34


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:06:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790458730598805504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790446723883749534

  • FIXING THE COMMON CONFUSION OF “LAWS OF NATURE” WITH “NATURAL LAW” OF COOPERATIO

    FIXING THE COMMON CONFUSION OF “LAWS OF NATURE” WITH “NATURAL LAW” OF COOPERATION
    Both you(Doug) and Martin have an odd habit of confusing the Laws of Nature(persistence) with the natural law (of cooperation).

    I realize that the terms “laws of nature” and “Natural Law” are easily confused, but they originate in the sequence of discovered “Laws of Nature” and THUS discovered “Natural Law” of Cooperation, to use as court common and legislative law, as the terms of social, economic, and political cooperation, making possible the defeat those laws through cooperation at political and economic and strategic scales.

    Now I know that intuitionistically this is an attractive conflation (falsehood) because it allows you to apply the naturalistic fallacy of the brutality of the laws of nature to the ‘benefits’ of the natural law of cooperation (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, excellence, and beauty): in other words, non aggression against demonstrated (earned) interests (assets).

    But this is not only just a fallacy, but it is a falsehood, and it undermines the Natural Law just as the Abrahamics and the Marxists and the general feminine Left seek to undermine all terms, and redefine them as what they are not: social construction of falsehood: Lying. πŸ˜‰

    Hugs to you both.
    Two of my favorite people whom I respect the most.
    But you know, what y’all are doing ‘isn’t right’. πŸ˜‰

    CD

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:01:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790457495296626688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790447314856755604

  • Thinking… I think you’re using yourself as a yardstick and generalizing it ins

    Thinking… I think you’re using yourself as a yardstick and generalizing it instead of using people with different abilities, skills, and resources, and thus different interpretations of the world, and possibilities within it, as a spectrum of yardsticks to determine whether or…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:50:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790454662841168362

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790449173449355695

  • “The Number of People Keep Increasing” Yes, I agree with this understanding. We

    “The Number of People Keep Increasing”
    Yes, I agree with this understanding. We have moved from a social organization where first family loyalty, then cultural loyalty, then business loyalty, all of which take into account status and social skills, to an era where intellectual skills are finally let loose without the inhibitions of social conformity, status, and divided loyalty to other than the truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:46:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790453774269526016

  • Well, the left uses comedy, and the right uses ‘shockery’ and so Stew and team a

    Well, the left uses comedy, and the right uses ‘shockery’ and so Stew and team are reaching the audience with the message they want and are willing to listen to.

    I can speak to a tiny fraction of very educated or at least very informed people. Populists can reach orders of…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:20:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790446997582848113

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790380001629544724

  • Well, that’s philosophy. I do law. πŸ˜‰

    Well, that’s philosophy. I do law. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 18:14:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790445500971323857

    Reply addressees: @auny_marie @finishedyet34

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790445354984316948

  • “I knew Curt would automatically be on the J’s”– Well you aren’t aware that in

    –“I knew Curt would automatically be on the J’s”–

    Well you aren’t aware that in my first career I put three families of Ashkenazi white collar criminals into the brutality of the legal system and ruined them and their businesses permanently. I only stopped because I realized after meeting my wife, that ‘dancing with the devil changes you, not the devil.’

    I am not technically anti-semitic, sexist, or racist or anything else of that nature. But I have an odd obsession with both truth, fairness, moral conviction (probably because of my childhood) and, prosecution of evil.

    So accidentally, despite leaving that occupation, even after a stint in the Justice Department, and focusing on building and running my own companies, I found that what I had observed as criminal behavior was, at social, economic, political, and strategic scales, the entire marxist system of baiting into hazard. From there I understood it was a jewish group strategy, and that marxism was a reformation of the seditions of the abrahamic religions. From there I discovered it was a semitic strategy because of the demographics and geography of the region. And from there that it was the female strategy of constraining alpha males put into a group competitive strategy, and it’s institutional forms, and resulting traditions, norms, values, and even metaphysical judgements.

    So I seek to produce laws that prohibit and punish the feminine method conflict of parasitism, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, rent seeking, corruption, undermining, sedition, treason, and social warfare from within.

    And I don’t (like most of you) consider it a ‘jewish’ problem so much as OUR problem to equally suppress the feminine means of antisocial, anti-political, anti-civilizational warfare that is the natural product of the evolution of female instinct and intuition.

    I’ve done the work in every discipline necessary from neuroscience to behavior, to natural law (ethics, morals), to the law itself, to government, legislation, regulation, policy, education, and even religion.

    Unfortunately I’ve been seriously ill again three times while working on it, and the ‘market demand’ for this solution prior to bloody revolution is sort of catching up to me despite that I was working on this problem for decades. πŸ˜‰

    I’m not a trivial thinker by any stretch of the imagination and it was extremely hard work over many years. It’s a hard problem. If it wasn’t. Someone would have done it before me. πŸ˜‰

    Because unlike you who sense identify and believe things, but cannot convince others who disagree, I have to scientifically demonstrate things, produce a constructive (causal) logic explaining those things, and produce a law with that logic that suppresses those things. And it has to be inescapable even by those vehemently against our suppression of those things.

    No criminal gives up his crimes because all criminals justify their crimes. It doesn’t mater if they’re small or large. Or if they’re committed by an individual or a would ethnicity or civilization.

    In other words fixing this problem is not a problem for THEM to solve, it’s a problem for US to solve. And no one else is going to solve it for you(us).

    Affections.
    CD

    Reply addressees: @ThorneCombest


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:41:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790437418358743041

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790430257922617347

  • Love you back. If I fail for all, at least I will succeed for ours, by trying to

    Love you back. If I fail for all, at least I will succeed for ours, by trying to succeed for all.

    hugs πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:20:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790431933932998677

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790430647841955984

  • (well done.). πŸ˜‰

    (well done.). πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:19:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790431741867409893

    Reply addressees: @ThorneCombest

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790430715554791521

  • Correct. However, I wanted to expand on race differences, ethnic differences, re

    Correct.

    However, I wanted to expand on race differences, ethnic differences, religious differences, and ingroup preference, with the social, economic, and political costs of ‘criminality’ meaning diversity that imposes costs upon the capital-in-toto of the community. In other words, without full integration all diversity is something between criminal and warfare.

    *For the audience please note that my, job is solving the problem for all peoples, even if I have a vested interest in my own people. As such, you will generally find I do not presume all people are as you (we) are in preference for homogenity.

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 17:10:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790429400929890305

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790425500239736949