Form: Reply

  • I plan on being front and center thanks – not that people like you who ask such

    I plan on being front and center thanks – not that people like you who ask such questions will be anywhere other than a hidey hole…..


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 23:12:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062120860620857349

    Reply addressees: @brenden_frost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062120297455849472


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062120297455849472

  • will just add a group to increase numbers, yes?

    will just add a group to increase numbers, yes?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 22:21:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062108196553265152

    Reply addressees: @BOBBYC1999

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062107425036062720


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BOBBYC1999

    @curtdoolittle Keep your personal page

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062107425036062720

  • we can also prevent (idiots) from claiming that which is open to construction an

    we can also prevent (idiots) from claiming that which is open to construction and falsifiable but not falsified from claiming a proof is required, rather than a falsification. But there are a lot of idiots and training idiots is costly… lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 20:50:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062085220885823493

    Reply addressees: @Race__Realist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062078633223876609


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Race__Realist

    @curtdoolittle That doesn’t change the fact that all EP hypotheses are ad hoc.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062078633223876609

  • You are confusing means of falsfication with proof. It is unscientific (a fallac

    You are confusing means of falsfication with proof. It is unscientific (a fallacy) to state that an historical narrative is a proof. such things don’t exist. However, if we can falsify a set and those that remain standing cannot be then we have performed due diligence.
    morover…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 20:49:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062084954245472258

    Reply addressees: @Race__Realist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062078633223876609


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Race__Realist

    @curtdoolittle That doesn’t change the fact that all EP hypotheses are ad hoc.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062078633223876609

  • as is all history

    as is all history


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 20:48:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062084637621714946

    Reply addressees: @Race__Realist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062078633223876609


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Race__Realist

    @curtdoolittle That doesn’t change the fact that all EP hypotheses are ad hoc.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062078633223876609

  • no

    no


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 16:15:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062015988902834179

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062004477883023360


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062004477883023360

  • “We Can Teach You The Education That Was Denied You.” —” Hi Curt … I was won

    “We Can Teach You The Education That Was Denied You.”

    —” Hi Curt … I was wondering where’s a good starting point? I watched your YouTube with Richard Nikoley. I loved it. Especially when you two spoke about the election and empires. I don’t have a super firm grasp on grammar,logic, and rhetoric (The Trivium). Should I dive into those subjects first before diving deep into propertarianism? Or where is a good place to start on your reading list? Any thoughts will help. Thanks” —Bryan Baker

    YOU LEARN IT BY UNPEELING THE ONION ONE LAYER AT A TIME. sort of like reading a fable, then a myth, then a short story, then a novel, then a historical novel, then a history, then the science. This is the only way to learn it – like we learn everything else. A layer of complexity at a time.

    1 – Read the Short Overview by Eli Harman Here:

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/29/propertarianism-core-concepts-by-eli-harman/

    2 – Read Thru The Overview Here (This is most of it … there is a lot of material)

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

    3 – Watch the videos here:

    https://www.facebook.com/pg/thepropertarianinstitute/videos/

    4 – Take the classes when we start teaching them (before christmas).

    5 – To build your general knowledge of the world: our reading list:

    https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/

    While you can ALWAYS learn A LOT from what we do here, it is a very big program that covers all the disciplines.

    LEARNING PROPERTARIANISM THOROUGHLY IS NO DIFFERENT FROM TAKING A FOUR YEAR UNIVERSITY DEGREE, DOUBLE-MAJORING IN THE LAW AND POLITICAL ECONOMICS WITH A MINOR IN HISTORY BUT WITHOUT THE “ELECTIVES”. IT’S A HUGE PROGRAM.

    But this is why you do it:

    “We Can Teach You The Education That Was Denied You as A Man.”

    How Long It Will Take?

    How long would it take you to learn to program a computer in an object oriented language? To study Calculus? To Study Accounting? To Study Economics? To study the law? Any technical discipline with it’s own methods and terminology takes about a year to ‘learn’, two years to feel comfortable with, and three years to be effective with, four years to be creative with, and five or six years to master: the 10,000 hour rule. This is just a rule of thumb when discussing how long it takes for humans to learn anything at all. Some of us are faster and some of us slower, but in general, those who are faster can tolerate accumulating hours more so than those who are slower. But in the end, it’s hours.

    That said, if you read the Short Courses and watch the Videos, in one month you will see how it all fits together, and in three months you will find that it has affected your thinking.

    Our experience is that on average, if you read the articles, follow me, Eli, and a few others, that in six months you will ‘understand’ everything we say. It will take you about a year to ‘start thinking’ in Natural Law – and that’s when you’ll feel the explanatory power starts affecting your life. Then, sort of like a light switch, over a very short period of time, all human activity will ‘make sense’ in very simple terms. “Everything becomes obvious.”

    If you have come to Propertarianism through the usual route: Constitutionalist or Classical Liberal > Libertarian > Anarcho Capitalist > NRx > Propertarianism, then your progress will be much faster.

    If you have studied one of the hard sciences so that you are familiar with the scientific method and scientific epistemology, then your progress will be faster.

    If you have at least some understanding of accounting, finance, or economics, then it will be much faster.

    If you have a background in philosophy – it might actually slow you down: most of philosophy, like most of religion, is nonsense or outright falsehood: fantasy literature.

    (If you have abnormal behavior and you’re looking for justification of it, you won’t find it here – you will find that there is a differences between tolerance and advocacy and abnormal behavior is not something that will be sanctioned in any society for long. Go see the left libertarians. They love deviant, selfish, anti-social behavior.)

    But in general the more you know the easier it will be to learn.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 13:13:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46089068_10156772562387264_142727959

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46089068_10156772562387264_1427279591659012096_o_10156772562377264.jpg Michael SheppardOk. And? Wheres the meatNov 12, 2018, 1:25 AMGregory Gichevcaste war is closerNov 12, 2018, 1:43 AMDan AltschuldWhere can I get a good overview of this k and r selection theory? I’m not familiar.Nov 12, 2018, 1:45 AMAurick FaustR selection in humans disgusts meNov 12, 2018, 1:47 AMMichael SheppardAnonymous conservative did a good book on itNov 12, 2018, 1:57 AMMichael SheppardCantwell talks about it alotNov 12, 2018, 1:57 AMAndrew ClaytonThe Great Gene WarNov 12, 2018, 2:09 AMDan AltschuldI loathe Cantwell but I’ll check out AC.Nov 12, 2018, 2:45 AMAndrew Gribblehttps://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUo37wPD7sqalutN0LjPZH6kZz2SYm925Nov 12, 2018, 2:49 AMAndrew GribbleCheck out the first podcast/vid/thingy. Takes two or three minutes to get started, but it serves as good as an intro as any.Nov 12, 2018, 2:50 AMDan AltschuldI like what ive seen of whittle before.Nov 12, 2018, 2:52 AMBrandon FiadinoIt’s not going to be a two sided affair.Nov 12, 2018, 7:50 AMDominic DeLucaIt’s a basic biological concept, you can read about it at an introductory level on somewhere like Wikipedia.Nov 12, 2018, 8:56 AMGreg HamiltonI disagree. The left/right thing will be part of it but in the end race will be the major factor once it’s gets real.

    Kin will overcome politics eventuallyNov 12, 2018, 1:37 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 01:23:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46089068_10156772562387264_142727959

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46089068_10156772562387264_1427279591659012096_o_10156772562377264.jpg Michael SheppardOk. And? Wheres the meatNov 12, 2018, 1:25 AMGregory Gichevcaste war is closerNov 12, 2018, 1:43 AMDan AltschuldWhere can I get a good overview of this k and r selection theory? I’m not familiar.Nov 12, 2018, 1:45 AMAurick FaustR selection in humans disgusts meNov 12, 2018, 1:47 AMMichael SheppardAnonymous conservative did a good book on itNov 12, 2018, 1:57 AMMichael SheppardCantwell talks about it alotNov 12, 2018, 1:57 AMAndrew ClaytonThe Great Gene WarNov 12, 2018, 2:09 AMDan AltschuldI loathe Cantwell but I’ll check out AC.Nov 12, 2018, 2:45 AMAndrew Gribblehttps://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUo37wPD7sqalutN0LjPZH6kZz2SYm925Nov 12, 2018, 2:49 AMAndrew GribbleCheck out the first podcast/vid/thingy. Takes two or three minutes to get started, but it serves as good as an intro as any.Nov 12, 2018, 2:50 AMDan AltschuldI like what ive seen of whittle before.Nov 12, 2018, 2:52 AMPaweł Płacheckimolymeme has an okayish video on itNov 12, 2018, 5:22 AMBrandon FiadinoIt’s not going to be a two sided affair.Nov 12, 2018, 7:50 AMDominic DeLucaIt’s a basic biological concept, you can read about it at an introductory level on somewhere like Wikipedia.Nov 12, 2018, 8:56 AMGreg HamiltonI disagree. The left/right thing will be part of it but in the end race will be the major factor once it’s gets real.

    Kin will overcome politics eventuallyNov 12, 2018, 1:37 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 01:23:00 UTC

  • I notice you aren’t mentinoing the german manorial states, the scandinavian, the

    I notice you aren’t mentinoing the german manorial states, the scandinavian, the french polish or italian….


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 16:13:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061653212124602368

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061650366213701632


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061650366213701632