Curt Doolittle

Form: Reply

  • I don’t understand. I understand ‘reputation’. I don’t understand ‘Irony’. I sus

    I don’t understand. I understand ‘reputation’. I don’t understand ‘Irony’.

    I suspect that you mean ‘rule by information’ is already in place.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-16 19:36:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085621901752483840

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085608756724097024

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085608756724097024

  • “Hello Curt. I’ve been talking to my teenage daughter about Propertarianism, and

    —“Hello Curt. I’ve been talking to my teenage daughter about Propertarianism, and your ideas of psychology. She finds it fascinating and would like to know more. Where would you suggest that she begins?”—

    We will offer the psychology, sociology, group evolutionary strategy course as soon as we have it ready. I think most people would enjoy this course, and It is the least technical course with the greatest influence on your understanding of the world.

    She can add herself to the mailing list and or register and we’ll send out a notice when it’s ready.

    I can’t really recommend my work in its current condition to a teenager, because it’s hard enough for the college educated person to grasp it as it is.

    We will also offer courses in Relationships: Family Members, Friends, Dating, Marriage, Children,

    And we will also offer mindfulness (how to insulate yourself from peer pressure or bad feelings etc). But it will take us the rest of this year to put most of this together.

    -hugs

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-16 15:00:00 UTC

  • I wish I did. But as someone who has an education in the fine arts, and has buil

    I wish I did. But as someone who has an education in the fine arts, and has built a marketing business, neither of those fields is friendly territory… lol

    Very hard to argue with tech if you can do the work.
    every era values some new form of calculation and it’s still ours.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 21:05:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085281830042038272

    Reply addressees: @SageNAllFields

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085233186584518657

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1085233186584518657

  • “…a rightist with high openness?”— I’m not really a rightist. I am a paleo l

    —“…a rightist with high openness?”—

    I’m not really a rightist. I am a paleo libertarian by nature, and a classical liberal by intuition – I just understand that the rightists are right…. so to speak.

    The right is right. I can’t argue with the truth. It is what it is.

    So yes, I have high openness, High Loyalty, and High Disgust. I suppose if I wasn’t a bit of an aspie I would also like hierarchy more than I do. But since aspies consider everyone the the same level, maybe that’s the difference. And since everything has to ‘fit together’ in my systematizing aspie brain, and aspies are info-vores my libertarianism is probably more do to the aspiness and my instincts more conservative.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 18:06:00 UTC

  • (where have you been?) lol

    (where have you been?) lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 13:54:00 UTC

  • I don’t think you understand. The existing common law consists of that which the

    I don’t think you understand.

    The existing common law consists of that which the judiciary will decide, and the state will enforce under the presumption we are equals.

    The existing continental law consists of the presumption of a feudal difference between the state and the citizenry, and that the citizens are permitted that which is not prohibited or commanded.

    The existing and past soviet and islamic law, consists of the presumption of enslavement by the state or the priesthood’s false god, and the the limiting of one’s actions to that which is permitted.

    “The White Law” consists of that law of cooperation, the abridgement of which demands adjudication, and restitution, for us to refrain from extermination, enslavement, or enserfment.

    it is a via-negativa law. It is a law of those who are equal in sufficient agency to be granted agency by one another – with the rest of man, beast, plant, and matter to be defended against in the interests of our continued production of agency, and continued transcendence.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 13:05:00 UTC

  • Yes, conservatives(empiricists) have a higher level of disgust sensitivity. Cons

    Yes, conservatives(empiricists) have a higher level of disgust sensitivity. Conservatives are the population’s means of detecting and purging harm – the white blood cells of the social order and polity. Progressives (consumptivists) have low sensitivity to disgust, but high demand for consumption, novelty, experience, and fear of being ‘left behind’.

    That does not mean that our disgust sensitivity is always right. It means that we must test whether than harm actually exists by propertarian means.

    Obviously in pedophilia it does. In homosexuality, other than keeping it out of the commons, I don’t see how it does.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 12:34:00 UTC

  • WE HAVE A HIGHER STANDARD OF TRUTH —“I think this is the fatal flaw of propert

    WE HAVE A HIGHER STANDARD OF TRUTH

    —“I think this is the fatal flaw of propertarianism. It’s an unnecessary step to go this far if you already have parasite proof governance.”–Daniel

    It is not a bug or a flaw but a feature and it is by design.

    No, we have a higher standard of ‘lying’ – higher standard in that in matters of the commons you lie for having not done due diligence, not by intention.

    We are testing whether you performed due diligence, against harm, not whether you intended to harm.

    The purpose is to prevent both the originator of the lie and the propagators of the lie, just as we prevent the thief, and those who profit from the works of the thief.

    We are extending the defense of property from goods and services to information.

    This is necessary because desirable lies and harmful information spreads faster and more cheaply under industrialized distribution of information than true and beneficial information.

    And it is by desirable lies that the first abrahamic dark age of the abrahamic religions, and the Jewish, Muslim, Marxist, postmodernist, feminist, attempt to create the second abrahamic dark age, have been created, and spread – lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-15 11:40:00 UTC

  • Thank you John Mark, for all you are doing for us

    Thank you John Mark, for all you are doing for us.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 12:20:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084787329812873217

  • Thank you John Mark, for all you are doing for us

    Thank you John Mark, for all you are doing for us.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-14 07:20:00 UTC