I don’t do ideology. I do law. What you folks do with law is up to you. But ask me to decide a question, I can do so using the law. It’s just that some of those decisions are unpleasant. …
… And I answered the questions according to that law. Not according to whether it’s normative, pleasant, or acceptable. Just whether decidable (true).
The law does not appeal for your permission. It just is the law whether you like it or not. And my work on law suppresses untruth.
That said, (a) I was laughing because I found the circumstance humorous, absurd, and intellectually ridiculous. (b) I teach and practice radical intolerance for ignorance, error, bias, sophism, and deceit and laugher is more pleasant than anger. (c) I don’t feign respect.
@curtdoolittle That’s not what I meant.
I was referencing that certain alt right elements lashing out at you are uncomfortable with civil war because of their growing affinity for socialism.
@curtdoolittle The alt right drift into socialism is probably a big cause in the lashing out against you.
The thought of secession or civil war is uncomfortable because it might cut off access to the state.
I don’t. It was a piece from early on. And I’m documenting how I talk about others. I think I’ve probably deleted the post you’re referring to already and replaced it with one that has a list of posts.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52508044_10156975689627264_5443115653126946816_n_10156975689622264.jpg Steven MillerI’ve tried to explain small portions of propertarianism to “normie” people I know and this notion is the brick wall. They agree with everything else but this is the deal breaker. How do I maneuver around this? Do I start with attacking the sky daddy? Omit that part all together?Feb 9, 2019, 7:13 PMJohn MarkSteven Miller I tell them you cam have your religion you just cant let it be parasitic. “I believe in Jesus” yes. “I believe in Jesus therefore we must invite 10 million 85-IQ 3rd worlders into our country” no.Feb 9, 2019, 8:01 PMSteven MillerThe people I talk with want their political representatives to be openly religious and make decisions from that base. They dont want immigration. I dont really bother with speaking to Democrats as I have better things to waste my time on.
This topic is becoming my go-to because it is my only challenge. I know people will dismiss Curt’s work because of the delivery so I try to dumb it down but I dont know how to dumb this topic down. The generational religious brainwashing is strongFeb 9, 2019, 9:02 PMCharles M TriplettSteven Miller I hold strong religious convictions. With that offered at the outset, I would be more inclined to support a government rooted in my same religious beliefs than I would an atheistic government, or one of false religion (Islam, Catholicism, etc.), because however bad religious governments may have been in the past, Godless governments are much worse, for they have nothing restraining them from evil works.Feb 9, 2019, 9:27 PMJohn MarkSteven Miller tactic to try possibly: “why are there so many different Christian denominations who all interpret the Bible differently?” (“Uhhh…) Answer: “the Bible is easy to misinterpret. Do you want our law to be easy to misinterpret so parasites can get a foot in the door? The law has to be bulletproof. Thus our law cannot be based on the Bible cuz too long, too easy to misinterpret & Jesus hasn’t shown up yet to interpret it perfectly.”
Also – “you’ve never had a Christian President. They all claim to be, but none of them is a true Christian, including Trump. If you want a Christian president/ruler/leader/king, come up with a plan to make it happen. We (Propertarians) have a plan to institute parasite-proof govt, we have a parasite-proof constitution written (almost finished), and it punishes evil like the book of Romans says govt is supposed to do. Get on board or get out of the way. Until Jesus comes back hop on board the next best thing.”Feb 9, 2019, 10:09 PMCurt DoolittleVery very smart.Feb 9, 2019, 10:10 PMCurtus MaximusSteven Miller You’re right, the brainwashing is strong.
Come at it from the economist’s perspective, then work your way to showing them how lies of others can serve to aid in direct theft in things that matter to them like things they consider property. And that currently the only way to keep these people from aiding in that theft entails ending their lies and forcing them into a form of negotiation instead.
And when it comes to the religious stuff, you have to treat the message very delicately. But like I’ve done with you (in my opinion), the strategy I used with you came to me easily because I already know you, and I (at least I think I know you) know that you care about others well-being, you always try to lighten up the situation with good humor and sincerity, and you make very wise decisions in how you treat others.
So, I knew you wanted assurance that people you consider innocent people could have their unique way they get fulfillment out of life preserved for them to keep. Which, I think I did that fairly successfully so far.Feb 9, 2019, 10:36 PMSteven MillerIn my experience, the difference of interpretation doesnt matter as long as the core beliefs are the same. As the man above said, a Christian gt is better than an atheist gt.
The ultimatum approach may work when the “time” comes but in everyday conversation it won’t.Feb 9, 2019, 10:36 PMCurt DoolittleThere is no conflict between christianity and the natural law – they are identical. However, there is a profound conflict between what christians may publicly claim is true and the natural law. This is a problem for christianity per se, just as it is for islam and judaism. If there is a conflict between christianity(faith) and the law(science) then science prevails under the law,Feb 9, 2019, 10:40 PMJohn MarkSteven Miller the ultimatum approach combined with “there have been no sincere christian presidents (at least not recently) is designed to remind them that there is a huge difference between what they want, and what they get. To snap them out of their idealism. Do you want to be ruled by leftism? Or not? We have a solution. To demand that our solution have a christian leader at the top of it is ridiculous since you dont have that now and never have.Feb 9, 2019, 10:49 PMCurtus MaximusSteven Miller I think you (by that I mean hypothetically you along with others with similar or virtually identical evolutionary strategies) could form your own form of gt however you’d like given you’ve created it honestly and contractually and it passes the test of scientific morality. Then on top of that you can do whatever, if I interpret how the propertarian system would work correctly.Feb 9, 2019, 10:57 PMSteven MillerGood stuff here. I keep coming back to this subject as I see as the only thing to stop us. I’ve been slowly chipping away at my immediate circle of influence. My strategy has always been devil’s advocate but I think it’s time for a more direct approach.Feb 9, 2019, 11:05 PMCurtus MaximusSteven Miller Good luck. Try using the e-prime and write some thoughts down in it. You may have some insights.Feb 9, 2019, 11:08 PMSteven MillerThat’s like Greek to most people. I have to translate for everyone I’ve shown it to. No, you all have that horse to ride. I’m just trying to see we all arrive at the same place.Feb 9, 2019, 11:11 PMBenjamin IrelandHe’s not invisible, he’s just really far away!Feb 10, 2019, 12:21 AMGreg HamiltonBenjamin Ireland or is he really close and really really small?Feb 13, 2019, 5:53 PM
Don’t be silly. I’m wrong all the time. The whole point of argument is to discover your errors. But when it comes to what I specialize in it will be very, very, very, hard to find fault.
—“Have you read Alfred Rosenberg’s “The Myth of the 20th Century”? If so, what’s your opinion?”— A Friend
It’s in my reading list. I have come to the same conclusion (although I didn’t know of this but until a year or two ago). I agree with it entirely. My understanding of the cycles of history is similar. I consider Mein Kampf and MT20C required reading for this reason. And if I could find someone to teach MK, MT20C, MacDonald, Goldberg (The Fatal Embrace), by emphasis on these cycles of history and the Conflict of Civilizations, then I would do so. I think the war between semites and europeans continues unabated, and that while we held them off for 1500 years, reasonably well, their chances of winning by population replacement are still significant.
The problem is separating the story of history, the problem itself, from the nazi ideology – which was possible at a certain time and place but such ‘ideology’ no longer has rather ignorant folk one generation from the fields to take root in.
—“Lacking better alternatives, I’d become NatSoc/Fascist if it meant survival, and with the exception of Propertarianism, not much else is being provided (or at least popularised) in way of solutions.”—Victor Blanc
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51654181_10156975381842264_7354059015296385024_o_10156975381832264.jpg Nick DahlheimCalling Mark Brahmin…. I love anthropolgy….and, GA is just not up to snuff…Feb 9, 2019, 3:36 PM
