https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2019/02/infinite-fed-wars.html?fbclid=IwAR3RRnBUihIu6McIkeklJwy2ELkUFW0dkrYWg6PdK1hSsceQNrU8a2sTAYU#moreby Flavio Duminuco
Curt have you seen this:
https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/2019/02/infinite-fed-wars.html?
INFINITE FED WARS?
AFFIRMATIVERIGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM http://AFFIRMATIVERIGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM
Liddell has got to be the biggest turd ever.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 20:57:00 UTC
—“…only works if your education system and culture doesn’t indoctrinate your progeny into cucks and social justice virtue signalers.”—
What do you think the christians (jews) did to your Greco Roman and Germanic ancestors?
Cuckery.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 20:54:00 UTC
—“One time I asked Curt Doolittle “What is stopping me from killing you, taking your things, and r*p*ing your women?”. He told me that if I wanted to do those things than he would join me and recruit more men to help and so on.”—- Lance Starin
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 20:52:00 UTC
https://herohomeschool.org/EDUCATING SUPERHUMANS – THE ASPIE SPECTRUM
—“Curt, you mentioned once childhood for aspies is miserable, but affords one superior information processing in adulthood. My question is: how do you help an aspie kid through childhood relatively unscathed so they can become functioning adults?”–Francis Zhou
Home schooling, lots of reading. it’s that simple.
MASS EDUCATION IN THE CURRENT MODEL IS VERY VERY VERY BAD FOR YOU!!!!!!!
ANSWER BY….
by Luke Weinhagen
We are doing this very thing.
Homeschooling puts the tools in your hands to teach to where the kids are at, rather than aggravate their disorientation trying to force them into learning styles.
Check your local area for support organizations. (for example, this our local coop – https://herohomeschool.org/)
We’ve had really good success with the Davis Program supporting the Aspie learning in our house. They put Dyslexia on the same spectrum and have adapted their Dyslexia tools to work with broader aspie kids audience.
Their focus is putting the responsibility for learning, and the tools for learning, in the kid’s hands. (https://www.dyslexia.com/ – and – http://www.davisautism.com/)
There are other systems out there as well if this one is not a good fit. The important thing is to get your child access to tools they can use.
If you are in the US, swing by the Homeschool Legal Defense Association (https://hslda.org/) to navigate the laws in your area and get help finding additional resources.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 20:51:00 UTC
OK. Y’all need to gimme a little time here to do real work. Has the “Propertarians are leaving us behind” pig pile of envy abated for a few days????
Yeah. Until john puts out another video…..
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 19:04:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095760587550683137
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51119384_10156984473227264_7463314560875757568_o_10156984473217264.jpg John MarkOmgFeb 13, 2019, 2:32 PMCurt Doolittleand???Feb 13, 2019, 2:32 PMJohn MarkIt’s hilarious. Now back to working on a vid so it can happen again lolFeb 13, 2019, 2:33 PMCurt DoolittleJohn Mark aaaaaahhhhh!!!!!!!!! heeelllllpppppp!!!!!! lolFeb 13, 2019, 2:34 PMJohn MarkCurt Doolittle this laugh is doing me good today!Feb 13, 2019, 2:35 PMAlexander ByronI didn’t know a political post could make me hungry.Feb 13, 2019, 2:35 PMEric GoldsteinI love the fact that you’ve been doing your own thing in a different country for years makes you a fed now. But let’s not mention any so called leaders or voices in the right wing who have openly admitted speaking to law enforcement or have very serious allegations against them.Feb 13, 2019, 2:41 PMEric GoldsteinAlso the fact no one seems to understand your so called “fed posting” is speaking very plainly about what is to come and not ramblings of a mad man.Feb 13, 2019, 2:44 PMJWarren PrescottWhat is the significance of them being in Kandahar? 😁Feb 13, 2019, 2:52 PMMark Di RussoApologies guys, have I missed something here??Feb 13, 2019, 3:40 PMMegan K. UsuiLove that the Absolutists get a whole hog nod! 🐖Feb 13, 2019, 7:22 PMCurt Doolittleit appears so.Feb 13, 2019, 8:55 PMBill JoslinI just.shat.myselfFeb 13, 2019, 11:35 PMJohn John StephensMike StreitFeb 13, 2019, 11:37 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 14:29:00 UTC
Um. They even steal our GENES.
😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 13:46:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095680529771479040
WHAT WILL THE REST OF THE WORLD DO?
—“Hmmmmm. So when the dust settles, do you see any outliers doing anything you might not have thought of already?”—Monica Marquez
The world will seek historical equilibrium in their spheres of influence, and the military will have to return to the continent rather than protecting europe, thereby forcing europe and russia and eastern europe into their historical alliance (christendom).
The outlier is the UK, and I do not know how but it would be preferable to restore the british empire as the alliance of english speaking (and british) peoples.
Incentives are relatively obvious at this point. We are the pin that holds the world together. But nuclear arms are what they are.
So I suspect that all it will do is accelerate what everyone in every think tank in the world suggests:
Return to normal across the world.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 12:19:00 UTC
ORIGINATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMON LAW
—“Hey Curt, there’s a question I have been wrestling with for a while regarding your work. It’s about discretion versus judge discovery law. In common law I have understood the idea to be, that judges look at previous cases of decisions in similar incidents of parasitism and make informed judgements based on that history. But how are not the original, “inaugural” decisions with no historical precedence not entirely reliant on that said judge’s discretion? … Thanks in advance!”—Alex, your friend.
A number of dependencies require clarification to answer this question:
0 – There is only one law in tort: reciprocity.
1 – The test of property is investment.
2 – The court is reluctant to transfer title (possession) and make itself a participant in a crime – which would harm the law, the people, and the profession.
3 – Because of evolution of our civilization, earlier cases are always more ‘rudimentary’, with law ‘cumulative’ (increasing in complexity with the complexity of the division of knowledge and labor)
4 – Judges are ‘informed’ by prior decisions so that they don’t have to do all the work all over again of being smarter than all other judges in all other matters (they consult the market for judgements).
5 – Because of the competition between judges over time in a multitude of similar cases, the market for decisions tends to resolve on constant judgements. (more than tends, actually) just as markets for goods resolve on prices, just as markets for scientific knowledge resolve on theories.
6 – Original criteria (sovereignty, reciprocity, property etc) developed over time, such that what we understand today (investment, reciprocity, voluntary transfer etc) is the result of the empirically cumulative record of judgements over time rather than design. (See the three books on the law in my reading list which discuss the ‘messy’ evolution of the common law.)
… – Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law.
… – Plucknett: A Concise History Of The Common Law.
… – Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty.
7 – The common law evolved because of ancient western indo european (european) sovereignty, truth, duty, and militia (everyone fights) is the principle difference between civilizations, and because the west consists of kinship and shareholder militias federating into armies.
HOWEVER
8 – The state began interfering (disintermediating) in the common law in the late middle ages in order to enforce the king’s policy when unifying territory. this is the primary reason for law codes: consolidation of different groups and territories by producing standard weights and measures of justice (conflict resolution).
9 – Under both Roman Law, Divine Right, and Democracy, legislatures have sought to corrupt common law (tort) into a single ‘non logical’ law. Rather than that tort always remains, and all legislation and regulation must maintain the law of torh (reciprocity).
10 – this was exacerbated by the juridical relativists (american) in the 1800’s particularly in response to the suppression of the south after the civil war, and in the 1900’s by the jewish and ne protestant attempt to undermine the constitution in order to bring about socialism.
11 – Worse, the american constitution would require:
(a) An explicit declaration of reciprocity as the basis of all law.
(b) The inviolability of tort and therefore reciprocity.
(c) The binding of the legislature to tor (contract production not law production.)
(d) The requirement that such law be strictly constructed (justified as adherent to tort, and reciprocity)
(e) That any legislation (contract of the commons) pass the court as lawful (in other words, all legislation is immediately subject to suit)
(f) That the court require legislators revise legislation found faulty, rather than ‘creating’ new legislation from the bench (not law). (Legislation must be returned to the legislature who has only so many days before
(g) That the monarchy (or ‘president’ or ‘nobility’ or ‘people’ or whatever) possess rights of veto over any and all legislation.
So, I think I have pretty thoroughly answered the question of the origination and method and means of correction.
I hope this helps.
Curt.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 11:27:00 UTC
—“Hey Curt, a friend and I are going to read Kuhn’s “Structure of Scientific Revolutions” soon. Do you recommend any other work that would expound the most up-to-date and rigorous philosophy of science? Cheers.”—
The conversion of science from justification to falsification to to market competition, and unifying science and law, where science is but an extension and application of the law of tort, and the testimony required in laws of tort.
Popper’s Logic of Scientific Discovery,
Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions,
Popper’s conjectures and refutations,
…but first read:
Hayek’s knowledge in society essay, and his
Road to Serfdom
… And if you can manage it:
Elanor Ostrom (Commons)
And Amartya Sen (philosophy and economy)
… And then
Hayek’s Law, Legislation, and Liberty if you want to take it all the way through to the end.
Popper is talking about explicit knowledge and hayek about tacit knowledge. And we must possess both. Just as we must possess recipes (transformations/actions) and theories (search algorithms/opportunities). One to search for opportunities and one to exploit them.
THe rest of the century is basically wasted with poorly articulated arguments attempting to state what is a fairly obvious problem.
As far as I know my work is most current, and that is that there is no via-positiva scientific method (what to do) only a via-negativa scientific method (due diligence in that your testimony is truthful.) That we must perform due diligence in each of the applicable dimensions of possible human comprehension. And that science consists of the art of attempting to possess the information necessary to testify.
And therefore that science then is a market for arguments.
So:
– Free Association > Hypothesis
– Hypothesis > Theory
– Theory > Law
– Law > Habituation
– Habituation > Metaphysical assumption.
Cheers.
-Curt
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-13 10:07:00 UTC