Form: Reply

  • WHAT IS THE PURPOSE? —“Interesting. What do you think is the purpose of religi

    WHAT IS THE PURPOSE?

    —“Interesting. What do you think is the purpose of religion?”—@HHBenedictXVII

    The training of intuition by Myth, Ritual, and Repetition which as a consequence produces interpersonal Regularity and personal Mindfulness, by reduction of need for comprehension of increasingly complex information where we have increasing limits to agency, in complex polities.

    Hence the distribution of religiosity vs rationality by intelligence and agency. Humans, esp women, have vulnerability to neuroticism (‘worry’, stress) if they lack agency.

    Intelligence provides agency.

    Religiosity decreases.

    Moral behavior remains constant.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 14:18:00 UTC

  • THE REASON THEY ARE REBELLING IS BECAUSE WE ARE SUCCEEDING – AND THEY HAVE FAILE

    THE REASON THEY ARE REBELLING IS BECAUSE WE ARE SUCCEEDING – AND THEY HAVE FAILED.

    Keep fighting the good fight.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 13:26:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098212192485326849

  • WE PLAN ON CONTINUOUSLY ROLLING COURSES – AT LEAST THE CORE ONES…. —“Hi Curt

    WE PLAN ON CONTINUOUSLY ROLLING COURSES – AT LEAST THE CORE ONES….

    —“Hi Curt, I’ve taken a look at the website and am very keen on the courses available. Propertarianism is essential. Unfortunately I am way too busy with the final year of my degree and British politics at the moment. Will the opportunity to join classes roll over continuously, or is there a set window? Thanks”—, Reece

    Oh yes. Of course. It’s continuous as long as we hae someone willing to run the course, answer questions, and grade assignments.

    Courses need a minimum number of students in order for the instructor to have it worth his time, and students need each other to dialog with.

    We start this coming week on the law (provided I don’t have any crisis that delays me a day or two… lol )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 12:58:00 UTC

  • “Can anyone explain what separates @curtdoolittle’s view of Christianity from so

    —“Can anyone explain what separates @curtdoolittle’s view of Christianity from someone like Jefferson’s? “Jesus just wants you to love your neighbor. All the miracle stuff is sugar coating to help the medicine go down.” It’s the oldest most milquetoast view ever.”— @HHBenedictXVII

    It doesn’t matter. I attempted to discover a means of legal tolerance of christianity with intolerance for other religions and it’s not possible because christians really do need their “woo woo”.The founders were Deists, and Jefferson (like me) saw Jesus as primitive philosopher.

    Because of demographics, and incentives, Xianity will continue to die off with each generation, resulting in the Benedict Option, leaving around a quarter of the population devout, but politically and economically powerless, while the rest continue with political and material rather than supernatural means of mindfulness.

    By demanding their ideal, being unwilling to compromise with secularists, and by being unwilling to use islamic levels of violence, Xians are done. Because it is a philosophy of the weak. Aryanism under the ‘excuse’ of Xianity was how our aristocracy ruled. w/o Aryans, no Xians.

    PEOPLE FOLLOW INCENTIVES NOT SHOULDS.

    It is possible to license christianity because of its adherence to natural law under the scholastics. It is not possible to license christianity if we tell people the dogma is ‘true’ rather than inspirational mythology. Ergo it is only possible to grant christianity special dispensation under the law.

    This is unacceptable for the devout because they cannot and do not hold to their faith in competition with truth, science, and law despite their claims to strong faith. The christian cannot tolerate separation between faith and truth because his faith is not strong enough to carry him. To the contrary. the truthful can tolerate the faithful when it comes to the commons in which they must act, when action in accordance with existential reality is always in their interests.

    There is no difference between Propertarian Natural Law, Moral Intuition, and Christian Morality EXCEPT that christians must show their devotion to this morality by lying (belief in nonsense) and the rest of us show our devotion to this morality simply by NOT LYING.

    I’m done with the trial run. It’s really, really, obvious that Xians demonstrate addiction responses to threats to their source of mindfulness (medication).

    And given the current state of xianity as not sufficiently desperate to compromise, while at the same time we are invaded by aliens, and under increasing rule by parasites, it appears that christians are the limiting factor on reform.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 09:14:00 UTC

  • agreed. good insight. few people think if it

    agreed. good insight. few people think if it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 22:34:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097987881933701126

    Reply addressees: @WokeRedpill

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097981955319173125


    IN REPLY TO:

    @WokeRedpill

    @curtdoolittle sure already thought of this, but what if propertarianism is a method of “values” securitization > political/legal philosophy? E.g. use blockchain to securitize crime, pollution, school performance stats etc, each tied to real estate value? https://t.co/wceJFxxiHQ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097981955319173125

  • i get it

    i get it


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 20:07:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097950798972141568

    Reply addressees: @Ozpin_88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097919077656465408


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097919077656465408

  • this guy has serious mental issues. lol

    this guy has serious mental issues. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 07:05:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097754054967599104

    Reply addressees: @NothingTheGreat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097750250763112448


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NothingTheGreat

    @curtdoolittle Curt.. are you aware of this crazy f–k that’s all but stalking you? I assume that you are, since you receive Google alerts, but just making sure.
    https://t.co/fyg4VqrQbx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097750250763112448

  • no but now i have cause for restraining order. 😉

    no but now i have cause for restraining order. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 06:59:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097752417607839745

    Reply addressees: @NothingTheGreat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097750250763112448


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NothingTheGreat

    @curtdoolittle Curt.. are you aware of this crazy f–k that’s all but stalking you? I assume that you are, since you receive Google alerts, but just making sure.
    https://t.co/fyg4VqrQbx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097750250763112448

  • No, never reward intellectual dishonesty with attention

    No, never reward intellectual dishonesty with attention.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 04:41:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097717907054886913

    Reply addressees: @CatholicWench @ApoStK

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097717089282846720


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097717089282846720

  • Nah. So far two hit pieces. Duplicity and intellectual dishonesty via twitter. N

    Nah. So far two hit pieces. Duplicity and intellectual dishonesty via twitter. Not worth my time to deal with people of that kind of character.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 04:33:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097715765745250305

    Reply addressees: @CatholicWench @ApoStK

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097714966860247040


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097714966860247040