Form: Reply

RE: Matrilineal and Matriarchal Societies?

Communes are a durable fantasy of feminine thinking.

But there are no survivable female societies, and the one we have left is evidence of what happened in the past: when men are decimated by war, women can, for a time, form female centric orders – until other men want their bodies, their livestock, or their territory.

So, the fantasy of Non-Paternal societies presumes that men as a group would allow you those freedoms. Because they could easily reduce you to slavery. After all, the europeans are the product of the steppe invasion who killed 90% of men, older women, and kept the young as sex and labor slaves. :).

Men only need dormitories (the precursors of christian monasteries) to take care of one another. They could instead, and generally do, form barracks instead – since together than can easily force others to do their will. Without a fence of men, women cannot even protect one another.

The truth is this: our experiment with intergenerational redistribution has failed because women will not bear enough children to pay for their retirement. And women consume 70% of government resources, when men over 30 provide 65% of government resources.

So what I think we mean is that the family is no longer a viable institution. And female employability will be replaced almost entirely by automation – far more so than male labor. This intersexual conflict is suicide.

Yes women are social creatures. But men are political creatures. The social order is dependent upon the political order, and the political order is dependent upon the military order – and this will never, ever, cease.