correct
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:26:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811452046194725113
Reply addressees: @RussellJohnston
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811408338795520128
Form: Reply
-
It’s funny. Why do are so many people afraid of being associated with our organi
It’s funny. Why do are so many people afraid of being associated with our organization because of fear of canceling? I mean, I understand that our ‘painful truths’ are offensive, but our solutions in constitutions, laws, policies, economics, family, education, faith and fitness are about as awesome as anyone who isn’t obsessively antisocial or dark triad evil would agree to if they didn’t know these solutions came from the same people who explain taboos and painful truths as the cause of our crisis of the age.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:25:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811451798219112448
-
Well, you know, we were just discussing this in a staff meeting and I mentioned
Well, you know, we were just discussing this in a staff meeting and I mentioned you and I think four or five other women. And brandon had a very clear insight into why you’re all ‘wonderful amazing women’. I’m not sure I can put it into unambiguous terms that are free of misinterpretation or insufficient meaning, but all of you are perfectly happy to say “that’s not my responsibility, that’s men’s responsibility” and “this is my responsibility instead” and “if I need to I can get men to handle their responsibilities”, and you’re perfectly happy with that. Now, that’s the male interpretation. I’m sure the female interpretation would differ. But what it means is you’re very easy women to work with and understand, and we’re never in conflict. I mean, most of the team wishes we could clone millions of you. ;).
We have one woman in the extended orbit that I think is both extremely intelligent, great at her work, talented and insightful. And I like to touch base with her on her life now and then precisely because she’s such an example of what I assume men would prefer the average woman to be. She even says “I just need a good solid working class man who is capable and loves me” or something of that nature. And of course. she found one. Because he’s a keeper.
Men don’t wanna fight or struggle with women. It’s depressing. Especially when it’s so easy to love women.Reply addressees: @auny_marie
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:22:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811451060973678592
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811412107738382751
-
Q: “Why should we choose markets for everything @curtdoolittle?”— I’d have to
—Q: “Why should we choose markets for everything @curtdoolittle?”—
I’d have to understand the context of your question.
Because it’s not just markets I refer to. It’s that under the rule of law by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, markets, and moral markets at that, free of imposition of costs by externality on the demonstrated interests of others, produce the maximization of cooperation, production, and velocity, producing the maximum innovation, adaptation, and evolution, thus continually exceeding previous rates of conversion of energy into work or mass, and thus producing greater choice of individual and collective fulfillment, in the shortest time, with the greatest certainty at the lowest risk.
In other words, it’s the optimum evolutionary strategy bot IN time and OVER time. 😉Reply addressees: @junkodama10 @PirateWires
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:16:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811449578069315584
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811412682936861035
-
But (a) she’s your daughter 😉 with your genes. (b) You’ve put effort into her.
But (a) she’s your daughter 😉 with your genes. (b) You’ve put effort into her. (c) You’ve insulated here from ideology. And (d) she’s going to be priceless so to speak.
Unfortunately those four criteria could, with effort produce a majority of capable and moral women. The problem is, we are still stuck with a minority at present. 😉
(that said, personally, from experience, I know you are a person of great character)Reply addressees: @FeminaStudiosa
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:12:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811448397448065024
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811413245866946861
-
That is my understanding. Schopenhauer thought it was hopeless. Freud excused it
That is my understanding. Schopenhauer thought it was hopeless. Freud excused it. Marx justified it. The feminists tried to lionize it. And women themselves demonstrated it. So, as much as I love women, they’re still just women. And all but a very small number at the margins…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 17:09:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811447635590455429
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811423149168406631
-
I assume you’re dismissing his geopolitical thought because you find his politic
I assume you’re dismissing his geopolitical thought because you find his political centrism to center-leftism offensive. Fortunately I can distinguish between the two. And I even assume his political position is more pragmatic business interest than intuition. So you know,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 14:29:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811407444431536222
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811357206899556632
-
Again, a confession as an accusation using the female method of projection. You’
Again, a confession as an accusation using the female method of projection. You’re stereotypical.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 14:24:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811406328549814345
Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811405244837888275
-
If you study my work, at least my work on sex differences in cognition, valuatio
If you study my work, at least my work on sex differences in cognition, valuation, and expression, eventually you’ll see the subversion, selfishness, irresponsibility, and deception of the feminine whenever you read or hear the words of women.
The question is, can women be made self aware of their behavior despite it’s instinctual origin, such that women can achieve sufficient rational responsibility to participate in politics, government, and law?
Because at present the predictions of the anti-suffrage population is bearing out almost exactly as they stated.
You see, I want to fix problems not just complain about them. And I think maybe this is possible.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 14:12:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811403224563200000
-
Then you are simply admitting to my oft discussed argument that the test of inte
Then you are simply admitting to my oft discussed argument that the test of intelligence is the number of lily pads necessary to cross the pond between increasingly contextually divergent patterns.
In other words, you’re inadvertently confessing to a lack of competency to judge that upon which you opine.
You could in fact, study something as simple as my tables of sex differences in cognition, or the table of grammars, or the methodology of disambiguation, or the ternary logic, or the trifunctional competition between civilizations.
You could try to find fault with any of those bodies of my work.
But you haven’t, and likely because you can’t, and for reason’s you’ve inadvertently confessed.
Outing yourself in public by demonstrating the canonical feminine is a rather ironic method of defending the feminine against the masculine.
So you know, I find you, in the end, more than a bit silly, childish, and cognitively feminine – which means childish.Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice @a7959705360789
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 14:06:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811401569453154304
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811381429978243410