Both. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-16 00:11:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813003440890765739
Reply addressees: @KurtSchlichter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812864350425633205
Form: Reply
-
Jordan. You’ve disappeared from not only my feed, but the public discourse all t
Jordan. You’ve disappeared from not only my feed, but the public discourse all too much. 😉 (Though I
do understand why).
I love the term “Malcompetence”. Brilliant. 😉
CD
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 21:14:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812958844110397501
Reply addressees: @jgreenhall
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812927501859188990
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @bkgrady1958 @MollyTeachesFCS @tribelaw I am not fond of the
RT @curtdoolittle: @bkgrady1958 @MollyTeachesFCS @tribelaw I am not fond of the special counsel provision when the target is an elected off…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 21:05:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812956637709365489
-
There are countries that cannot do otherwise and are gradually succeeding but th
There are countries that cannot do otherwise and are gradually succeeding but they are not high trust countries. So when I made the statement, as usual, I’m including those in the claim. ;). -hugs
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 20:18:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812944859529199673
Reply addressees: @BuffJones2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812943877860696365
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Luigipalazzini @Fiesty26Fiesty @tribelaw Under what illusion
RT @curtdoolittle: @Luigipalazzini @Fiesty26Fiesty @tribelaw Under what illusion do you assume that there is consensus on the law, particul…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 19:59:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812940161602494734
-
Under what illusion do you assume that there is consensus on the law, particular
Under what illusion do you assume that there is consensus on the law, particularly on constitutionality, and more particularly on the ambitions of the Court in the broader context of the consequences of legislation, regulation, and findings of the court?
In economics we are extremely conscious of the lack of commutability between domains, yet in law, this escapes the ‘lawyering’ class, which should be obvious given the disputes over decisions, and it certainly escapes the public who for some reason confuses their personal moral intuition as unassailable substitute for the sciences, empirical evidence, and any attempt at logic.Reply addressees: @Luigipalazzini @Fiesty26Fiesty @tribelaw
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 19:59:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812940137447452674
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812937182744879586
-
a) i avoid it b) yes that’s why. 😉
a) i avoid it
b) yes that’s why. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 19:54:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812938806670328164
Reply addressees: @RussellJohnston
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812937277766791360
-
RT @NoahRevoy: @TheMcMullan @curtdoolittle We must impress on the conservative p
RT @NoahRevoy: @TheMcMullan @curtdoolittle We must impress on the conservative public that their “representatives” are handlers and pacifie…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 19:01:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812925565718176017
-
Exactly
Exactly.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 17:47:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812906933646684173
Reply addressees: @WalterIII @TheLastFourYea1 @tribelaw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812896552530411629
-
You are getting so good Walter. 😉
You are getting so good Walter. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 17:03:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812895888878031044
Reply addressees: @WalterIII @TheLastFourYea1 @tribelaw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812895494966026729