Yes. Especially if it’s mined.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 17:14:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829568341574373433
Reply addressees: @iamnot_elon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829468156240236592
Form: Reply
-
Yes
Yes.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 13:01:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829504616998003006
Reply addressees: @realTrumpNewsX
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829227764248969538
-
Thats nonsense
Thats nonsense.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 12:12:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829492289301102949
Reply addressees: @SidneyG41629545 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1828912216806174870
-
I still can’t believe anyone would say that other than as indirect criticism as
I still can’t believe anyone would say that other than as indirect criticism as a proxy for your anti-racism.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 11:59:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829489026115817645
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829277500570312714
-
@GadSaad the extremely unpleasant answer is reducible to giving women the vote,
@GadSaad the extremely unpleasant answer is reducible to giving women the vote, their monopolization of education, consumption, and debt, combined with postwar marxist sequence amplified by the collapse of reproduction and the compensation with immigration. Television didn’t help. And the internet then social media made it worse. Really. That’s the reason.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-30 10:58:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829473808387833859
-
Sure. It’s a great topic for Q&A. ;). (and it’s not that complicated) 😉
Sure. It’s a great topic for Q&A. ;). (and it’s not that complicated) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 21:03:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829263540374609947
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829243083025998024
-
Interesting question. Or is it that I address the issue more? We’d have to ask M
Interesting question. Or is it that I address the issue more? We’d have to ask Martin.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 21:02:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829263270169268595
Reply addressees: @partymember55 @AutistocratMS @Asuka_On_Drugs @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829259726326304894
-
I was answering the question more broadly
I was answering the question more broadly.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 17:13:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829205665317040512
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Asuka_On_Drugs @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829204824099008601
-
The problem of course is differences in definitions of private property. Which l
The problem of course is differences in definitions of private property. Which libertarians never state, because it would expose the claim as a half truth.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 17:12:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829205562829181258
Reply addressees: @HoppeQuotes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1827058552499823067
-
Hayek initiated the treatment of informal capital as capital. Mises like rothbar
Hayek initiated the treatment of informal capital as capital. Mises like rothbard did not. (My work initiates knowledge capital as capital.) Lionizing actors and undermining others is an abrahamic-marxist technique of evading arguments with emotional and loyalty appeals to the…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 17:10:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829205104060170241
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1828836440542777626