Soon. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 21:53:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844134201496588739
Reply addressees: @TheMcMullan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844126055134892045
Soon. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 21:53:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844134201496588739
Reply addressees: @TheMcMullan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844126055134892045
No it’s moving along but it’s fighting a power law: the first 80% is far easier than each additional percent, and each incremental percent harder than the last.
They have a number of challenges:
Power, Chips, Training Data, Human Correction of it.
Attention states, recursive…
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 20:46:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844117275097616623
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844115631316271219
(Agreed)
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 18:32:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844083599215296939
Reply addressees: @GOPtheGamer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844078556357459995
RT @curtdoolittle: @feafij EXPLAINING THE HIERARCHY OF LEGAL LEGITIMACY IN THE USA – AND REASON FOR OUR PRESENT CONFLICT
QUESTION
—“does…
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 17:56:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844074430789828940
RT @curtdoolittle: @Duriaann_ @GodswillUgwaJr @LittleMammith Socratic. It took time because the facts everyone was using existed within fal…
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 16:25:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844051597602779226
sorry but no. McGilchrist has an agenda (religious) and is manipulating the research by Simon Baron Cohen and others. You can have fast systematizing and future prediction or slow empathizing and present explanation. But the human brain possesses limited resources and the further you go in one direction the further you trade off in the other (autism in male, psychosis in female).
Since these capacities arent relative or arbitrary but opposites that divide the group sense perception of one another, the group, the environment, and the world by time and space, its the discovery of trade offs between them in the current context that produces cooperation. But there is no value in empathizing over the long term and population any more so than there is value in systemizing interpersonal experience between individuals in the short term. And for the same reasons most men can comprehend this and few women can. Just as most women can comprehend emotional states while few men can. There are no female dominated societies, never have been, and never will be for this reason.
Reply addressees: @LocalRachel
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 13:37:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844009323665715201
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843977357805416855
Data is data. Sorry. IQ test data is exhaustive.
Also, while you may not know this, mathematics can be performed as a language or as a model. The sexes differ in mathematical cognition in this fashion. (Verbal-pictoral vs spatial mechanical).
During the early part of the last century, there was an open discussion of this problem, and that it was evident in physics, economics, and mathematics (“jewish physics”, “jewish economics”). This is most popularly obvious in the work of cantor, bohr, and einstein, who reversed the european restoration of mathematics under Descartes.
In fact, the failure of physics over the past seventy plus years can be attributed to this ‘catastrophe’, and the absence of modeling in physics and its replacement with what in economics we call ‘mathiness’.
Which is odd, given that the problem in economics is understanding this issue while still using the wrong calculus for economic analysis.
There are a small number of people working on this problem but they are coming from computer science (operationalism) instead of mathematics and physics.
Computation requires modeling. My work directly and Wolfram in application, address this problem.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @BIackColdbrew
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 13:23:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1844005662378115072
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843990424165233027
accusation without argument. make the case or you’re just lying.
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 02:52:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843846911989821682
Reply addressees: @_lucidreams_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843839701876371769
Noah is a mass of muscle, he has an enviable record of success with clients, has authored a treatise on effective method, and a consumer book on manipulation – on top of contributing to the institute, being a husband, father, and friend to many.
Kind of difficult to criticize…
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-09 00:11:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843806420476801361
Reply addressees: @russianbotulism @NoahRevoy @NatLawInstitute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843770550520631455
Smart. Probably the incentive for the temporality of returns combined with the consumer credit capital misdirection. Used to be GOV used Mil to private sector pipeline. Hard to see private sector make the shift. Probably require private-public partnership. Great topic for…
Source date (UTC): 2024-10-08 15:53:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843681136092070165
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @porterstansb
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843677197053415441