Form: Reply

re: https://t.co/evJGJ3CaLO
Petty comment:

No, mathematics is a paradigm, vocabulary, grammar, and logic of ratios. The universe can be (and must be) described with ratios.
The universe isn’t mathematical. In fact, if anything it’s computational (discrete) and NOT mathematical (continuous).
If you grasp that mathematics (meaning mathematical reasoning) is universally statistical, and not operational (meaning computational reasoning) then you will make fewer errors in modeling the universe. We can rather easily say that the failure of physics over the past thirty or more years is due to ‘mathiness’ (as we call it in economics) which means failing to have an operational (meaning physical) model.
Hence, please study the quantum background. If we have the background model, the standard model, and the einsteinian model of relativity we have three models to make commensurable.
And if it’s not obvious, that will only be possible if we begin with an operational model at the quantum background. And it’s not as though no work has been done at that subject.
But trying to harmonize the standard model with relativity has failed largely because there is no physical model (and space time is a bit of a fudge that’s made it worse).
CD, NLI