RT @elonmusk: Accurate
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-20 03:03:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859069905985040651
RT @elonmusk: Accurate
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-20 03:03:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1859069905985040651
Will; You and yours just got your lunch eaten by Musk’s acquisition and his defense of free speech.
“I drink your milkshake” sounds appropriate. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-19 20:35:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858972458801574271
Reply addressees: @whstancil
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858918192837546493
RT @elonmusk: The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is a criminal organization imo
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-19 20:34:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858972178857030084
Correct. Though my (our) position is that income statement economics is deleterious and we should use balance sheet economics.
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-19 16:44:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858914266981822786
Reply addressees: @I_Like_Buttes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858760748270579908
We can, but apparently my (our) work is sufficiently expressed in the publicly available data that it’s not necessary. I’m currently experimenting with the difference between training as we do it, and tuning it specifically and that experiment will tell us which way to invest in. Though, if the expansion of memory continues as promised then it won’t be necessary. Instead we’ll move to model Openai o1 which is more orintented to breaking down tasks necessary for the strict construction (constructive logic) we use.
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-19 03:52:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858719990444437504
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858680117431529810
hugs 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-19 01:12:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858679791949615212
Reply addressees: @hyperliberalism
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858616291831005531
OMG, This is amazing
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-19 01:12:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858679693261914382
Reply addressees: @bierlingm
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858616335179411510
OMG that’s better than I would have expected. Thank you. Great question to ask.
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 20:33:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858609395703443668
Reply addressees: @bierlingm
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858606632021655624
OK. We’ve found the hole in the prompt. It’ll take me a bit to plug it (causality > responsibility > epistemology > externality > liability > warrantability) it’s using most of the tests but not solving the core problem.
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 20:14:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858604598115922346
Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858603671887794251
And it’s perfect without even having the source material (book).
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-18 20:02:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858601583246012798
Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1858601325656707529